More strange and/or foul reactions

[jon-nyc]

[Copper]

Foul

[Mik]

@bachophile said in More strange and/or foul reactions:

That’s it. no more a-whoring for me.

Pussies.

[jon-nyc]

Is it even real?

[Renauda]

@jon-nyc

More on the unfolding or attempted pogrom in Dagestan:

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2023/10/29/anti-israeli-mob-storms-airport-in-russias-dagestan-a82926

[jon-nyc]

Apparently it’s just a misunderstanding. They seem to think Hamas is on the plane.

Some of the signs held by demonstrators read “Child killers have no place in Dagestan”

[jon-nyc]

$2Billion dollars. Maybe we’ll see a house committee investigate. lol.

[jon-nyc]

[Jolly]

Oh, I think Jared's program was doing better than most, before The Resident fucked it up

[jon-nyc]

https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/youth-football-club-launches-investigation-after-child-refuses-to-play-against-jewish-team/

[George K]

In 3 ½ weeks we went from "You can't have hateful speech" to "Kill the Jews."

ETA:

"Remember 2016-2020 when leftists claimed Nazis were everywhere, under every rock, it was just a matter of time til they were all revealed?

After the 10/7 attacks in Israel, it turns out they were right."

[jon-nyc]

Makes you wonder if/when the MAGA crowd will realize that being anti-Hamas and Iran while being pro-Russia isn’t really a sustainable combination.

[Copper]

@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:

Makes you wonder if/when the MAGA crowd will realize

The MAGA crowd is generally very well educated and well informed.

[Horace]

"Pro Russia" is a tribal strawman anyway, obviously.

[Renauda]

@Copper

The MAGA crowd is generally occasionally very well educated and well or even somewhat informed.

FIFY

[jon-nyc]

@Horace said in More strange and/or foul reactions:

"Pro Russia" is a tribal strawman anyway, obviously.

Ok, replace with “support pro-Russia policies”. The point stands.

[Horace]

@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:

@Horace said in More strange and/or foul reactions:

"Pro Russia" is a tribal strawman anyway, obviously.

Ok, replace with “support pro-Russia policies”. The point stands.

It's not much of a point if the policy is intended to be pro-USA.

[jon-nyc]

That seems nonsensical. But I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt if you’d like to explain. Maybe I’m missing something.

[Horace]

@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:

That seems nonsensical. But I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt if you’d like to explain. Maybe I’m missing something.

You can be specific about the pro-Russia policies you're referring to. If their intent is to support the usa, with an incidental side effect of being advantageous to Russia as compared to an opposing policy, then a framing that the policy is pro-russia, would be rhetorically disingenuous.

[jon-nyc]

I conceded your point and changed ‘being pro-Russia’ with ‘supporting pro-Russia policies’. The former implies motive the latter just effect.

Again the point stands.