More strange and/or foul reactions
-
wrote on 29 Oct 2023, 18:15 last edited by
-
wrote on 29 Oct 2023, 18:22 last edited by
Foul
-
That’s it. no more a-whoring for me.
wrote on 29 Oct 2023, 18:59 last edited by@bachophile said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
That’s it. no more a-whoring for me.
Pussies.
-
wrote on 29 Oct 2023, 19:30 last edited by
Is it even real?
-
wrote on 29 Oct 2023, 20:30 last edited by
More on the unfolding or attempted pogrom in Dagestan:
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2023/10/29/anti-israeli-mob-storms-airport-in-russias-dagestan-a82926
-
wrote on 29 Oct 2023, 20:45 last edited by
Apparently it’s just a misunderstanding. They seem to think Hamas is on the plane.
Some of the signs held by demonstrators read “Child killers have no place in Dagestan”
-
wrote on 30 Oct 2023, 02:50 last edited by jon-nyc
-
wrote on 31 Oct 2023, 01:50 last edited by
-
wrote on 31 Oct 2023, 02:22 last edited by
Oh, I think Jared's program was doing better than most, before The Resident fucked it up
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2023, 11:43 last edited by George K 11 Jan 2023, 11:54
In 3 ½ weeks we went from "You can't have hateful speech" to "Kill the Jews."
ETA:
"Remember 2016-2020 when leftists claimed Nazis were everywhere, under every rock, it was just a matter of time til they were all revealed?
After the 10/7 attacks in Israel, it turns out they were right."
-
wrote on 2 Nov 2023, 15:07 last edited by
-
wrote on 2 Nov 2023, 15:12 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
Makes you wonder if/when the MAGA crowd will realize
The MAGA crowd is generally very well educated and well informed.
-
wrote on 2 Nov 2023, 15:14 last edited by
"Pro Russia" is a tribal strawman anyway, obviously.
-
@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
Makes you wonder if/when the MAGA crowd will realize
The MAGA crowd is generally very well educated and well informed.
-
wrote on 2 Nov 2023, 20:45 last edited by
@Horace said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
"Pro Russia" is a tribal strawman anyway, obviously.
Ok, replace with “support pro-Russia policies”. The point stands.
-
@Horace said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
"Pro Russia" is a tribal strawman anyway, obviously.
Ok, replace with “support pro-Russia policies”. The point stands.
wrote on 2 Nov 2023, 21:41 last edited by@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
@Horace said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
"Pro Russia" is a tribal strawman anyway, obviously.
Ok, replace with “support pro-Russia policies”. The point stands.
It's not much of a point if the policy is intended to be pro-USA.
-
wrote on 3 Nov 2023, 02:13 last edited by
That seems nonsensical. But I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt if you’d like to explain. Maybe I’m missing something.
-
That seems nonsensical. But I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt if you’d like to explain. Maybe I’m missing something.
wrote on 3 Nov 2023, 02:21 last edited by@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
That seems nonsensical. But I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt if you’d like to explain. Maybe I’m missing something.
You can be specific about the pro-Russia policies you're referring to. If their intent is to support the usa, with an incidental side effect of being advantageous to Russia as compared to an opposing policy, then a framing that the policy is pro-russia, would be rhetorically disingenuous.
-
wrote on 3 Nov 2023, 02:35 last edited by
I conceded your point and changed ‘being pro-Russia’ with ‘supporting pro-Russia policies’. The former implies motive the latter just effect.
Again the point stands.