Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trump’s lawyer forgot to check the “Jury” box

Trump’s lawyer forgot to check the “Jury” box

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
14 Posts 6 Posters 160 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Jolly

    Oh, you mean the fraud trial where all the loans were paid back and independent assessors were used to establish the worth of the properties?

    89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @Jolly said in Trump’s lawyer forgot to check the “Jury” box:

    Oh, you mean the fraud trial where all the loans were paid back and independent assessors were used to establish the worth of the properties?

    You’d think a jury of his peers would see it that way, too. 😂

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Look, if you want to have government go down this road, so be it. For every New York official that would like to get Trump, I'm sure there's folks in Texas or Alabama that would gladly haul on the rope bound to Chuckie's neck.

      Is that the nation you want?

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      1 Reply Last reply
      • 89th8 Offline
        89th8 Offline
        89th
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        I want a nation of laws. And a nation where the FAFO law applies to Presidents who don’t accept election losses and peaceful transfers of power.

        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girl
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          Well, at least he had a good lunch!

          1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 89th

            I want a nation of laws. And a nation where the FAFO law applies to Presidents who don’t accept election losses and peaceful transfers of power.

            JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            @89th said in Trump’s lawyer forgot to check the “Jury” box:

            I want a nation of laws. And a nation where the FAFO law applies to Presidents who don’t accept election losses and peaceful transfers of power.

            Did I miss a coup or something?

            Do laws apply to some people and not others? Is Justice inherently selective, depending on who is in power?

            Kennedy, Kennedy, King, Wallace, Reagan. I was around for all of those. All done by people who figured bullets were more effective than ballots.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • 89th8 Offline
              89th8 Offline
              89th
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              Laws apply to all. But the idea of the justice system being weaponized is not credible if it comes from people who do not recognize the very basic concept that a sitting President who refuses to accept his election loss is about as dangerous and anti-American of a move a President can make. Believe me, I'll take your advice on life and living before nearly everyone. You're as good as it gets. But comments about trials being unfair I can't even begin to believe if you don't see the danger of Trump's actions after he lost. Again, imagine if Obama lost in 2012 and behaved the same way. You'd be calling for capital punishment for treason.

              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
              • 89th8 89th

                Laws apply to all. But the idea of the justice system being weaponized is not credible if it comes from people who do not recognize the very basic concept that a sitting President who refuses to accept his election loss is about as dangerous and anti-American of a move a President can make. Believe me, I'll take your advice on life and living before nearly everyone. You're as good as it gets. But comments about trials being unfair I can't even begin to believe if you don't see the danger of Trump's actions after he lost. Again, imagine if Obama lost in 2012 and behaved the same way. You'd be calling for capital punishment for treason.

                JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by Jolly
                #11

                @89th said in Trump’s lawyer forgot to check the “Jury” box:

                Laws apply to all.

                No they don't You admitted it yourself, just as soon as you typed "But" which negated the entire sentence.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  Grammatically untrue.

                  “Laws apply to all. But I’m catching a flight right now and don’t have time to elaborate.”

                  Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • taiwan_girlT Offline
                    taiwan_girlT Offline
                    taiwan_girl
                    wrote on last edited by taiwan_girl
                    #13

                    Related to President Trump's New York trial

                    Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday decided to send a Truth Social post during his New York fraud civil trial attacking Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron’s principal law clerk as Sen. Chuck Schumer’s (D) “girlfriend,” sharing an image of Allison Greenfield and Schumer smiling in a photograph and linking to her Instagram profile.

                    “Schumer’s girlfriend, Alison [sic] R. Greenfield, is running this case against me. How disgraceful! This case should be dismissed immediately,” the post said.

                    So, middle of his trial and he is making smart aleck remarks about the judge's clerk????? 🙄

                    And this is the guy that some people think should be President? aye yi yi

                    Both of the top President candidates are mentally incompetent to be president At least one of them has handlers to keep him inside the lane. The other one doesn't. That is scarier!!

                    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                    • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                      Related to President Trump's New York trial

                      Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday decided to send a Truth Social post during his New York fraud civil trial attacking Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron’s principal law clerk as Sen. Chuck Schumer’s (D) “girlfriend,” sharing an image of Allison Greenfield and Schumer smiling in a photograph and linking to her Instagram profile.

                      “Schumer’s girlfriend, Alison [sic] R. Greenfield, is running this case against me. How disgraceful! This case should be dismissed immediately,” the post said.

                      So, middle of his trial and he is making smart aleck remarks about the judge's clerk????? 🙄

                      And this is the guy that some people think should be President? aye yi yi

                      Both of the top President candidates are mentally incompetent to be president At least one of them has handlers to keep him inside the lane. The other one doesn't. That is scarier!!

                      RenaudaR Offline
                      RenaudaR Offline
                      Renauda
                      wrote on last edited by Renauda
                      #14

                      @taiwan_girl

                      And as result the good judge hit old Trumpster with a gag order:

                      https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-gag-order-civil-trial-1.6985754

                      Tumults of orange tinted apoplexy ensues.

                      Elbows up!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups