The Why-not? Grand Jury
-
Hypothetical...
What happens if none of these charges or the NYC charges stick? Is this the end of legal gotcha games at the state level in Presidential elections?
@Jolly said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
Hypothetical...
Is this the end of legal gotcha games at the state level in Presidential elections?
No way.
-
@Jolly said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
Hypothetical...
Is this the end of legal gotcha games at the state level in Presidential elections?
No way.
@Aqua-Letifer said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
@Jolly said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
Hypothetical...
Is this the end of legal gotcha games at the state level in Presidential elections?
No way.
I dunno. Tit-for-tat eventually winds up being a form of mutually assured destruction.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
Which is exactly why I oppose impeaching Biden. We do not want it to become the norm. GOP should have taken the high road and shouted it to the rafters, at least until there is something concrete, not just something we can claim.
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
Which is exactly why I oppose impeaching Biden. We do not want it to become the norm. GOP should have taken the high road and shouted it to the rafters, at least until there is something concrete, not just something we can claim.
@Mik said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
Which is exactly why I oppose impeaching Biden. We do not want it to become the norm. GOP should have taken the high road and shouted it to the rafters, at least until there is something concrete, not just something we can claim.
I'm afraid there's not much high road in politics.
-
Which is exactly why I oppose impeaching Biden. We do not want it to become the norm. GOP should have taken the high road and shouted it to the rafters, at least until there is something concrete, not just something we can claim.
@Mik said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
Which is exactly why I oppose impeaching Biden. We do not want it to become the norm.
Agreed, but...
Just from a purely political/power point of view, and impeachment inquiry, with no subsequent impeachment might be a savvy move - one that will expose the corruption that is alleged, weakening Robert L. Peters, allowing a GOP win.
Impeachment is a non-starter, because conviction is not going to happen, and even if it does, we're looking at Kamala for a year.
Expose everything - you know, sunlight.
GOP should have taken the high road and shouted it to the rafters, at least until there is something concrete, not just something we can claim.
High road? Politics? C'mon, man! The GOP is playing by the Alinsky book. Once a tradition or norm is struck down, Senator Reid, there's no need for the other side to adhere to it for the sake of taking the high road. "Make 'em play by their own rules."
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
@Jolly said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
Hypothetical...
Is this the end of legal gotcha games at the state level in Presidential elections?
No way.
I dunno. Tit-for-tat eventually winds up being a form of mutually assured destruction.
@Jolly said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
@Aqua-Letifer said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
@Jolly said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
Hypothetical...
Is this the end of legal gotcha games at the state level in Presidential elections?
No way.
I dunno. Tit-for-tat eventually winds up being a form of mutually assured destruction.
I think that's exactly the route we've chosen on every conceivable level. Culturally, technologically, politically, militarily, you name it. We haven't hit the brakes on any of it.
-
@Mik said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
Which is exactly why I oppose impeaching Biden. We do not want it to become the norm.
Agreed, but...
Just from a purely political/power point of view, and impeachment inquiry, with no subsequent impeachment might be a savvy move - one that will expose the corruption that is alleged, weakening Robert L. Peters, allowing a GOP win.
Impeachment is a non-starter, because conviction is not going to happen, and even if it does, we're looking at Kamala for a year.
Expose everything - you know, sunlight.
GOP should have taken the high road and shouted it to the rafters, at least until there is something concrete, not just something we can claim.
High road? Politics? C'mon, man! The GOP is playing by the Alinsky book. Once a tradition or norm is struck down, Senator Reid, there's no need for the other side to adhere to it for the sake of taking the high road. "Make 'em play by their own rules."
@George-K said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
ust from a purely political/power point of view, and impeachment inquiry, with no subsequent impeachment might be a savvy move - one that will expose the corruption that is alleged, weakening Robert L. Peters, allowing a GOP win.
Comer says he has the votes. They aren't going to impeach Biden. But they are going to air out a lot of dirty laundry.
-
@George-K said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
ust from a purely political/power point of view, and impeachment inquiry, with no subsequent impeachment might be a savvy move - one that will expose the corruption that is alleged, weakening Robert L. Peters, allowing a GOP win.
Comer says he has the votes. They aren't going to impeach Biden. But they are going to air out a lot of dirty laundry.
-
@George-K said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
@Jolly said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
Comer says he has the votes
He has the votes to impeach?
Nope. He think he has the votes to open an inquiry. Apparently, an official inquiry gives Congress more subpoena power, etc.
-
@George-K said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
@Jolly said in The Why-not? Grand Jury:
Comer says he has the votes
He has the votes to impeach?
Nope. He think he has the votes to open an inquiry. Apparently, an official inquiry gives Congress more subpoena power, etc.
