Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?

Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
13 Posts 6 Posters 49 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Speaking as somebody who makes a living out of assessing equipment for use in explosive atmospheres, I have to say that the thought of the use of the most easily ignitable of gases becoming commonplace fills me with joy, and hopefully dollars.

    I was only joking

    1 Reply Last reply
    • taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girl
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      I think it is no more dangerous (maybe less so) than propane tanks currently in cars/taxis/buses etc.

      Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
      • CopperC Offline
        CopperC Offline
        Copper
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Hydrogen

        09474104-329e-4081-aab9-cf2239398690-image.png

        LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
        • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

          I think it is no more dangerous (maybe less so) than propane tanks currently in cars/taxis/buses etc.

          Doctor PhibesD Offline
          Doctor PhibesD Offline
          Doctor Phibes
          wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
          #5

          @taiwan_girl said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

          I think it is no more dangerous (maybe less so) than propane tanks currently in cars/taxis/buses etc.

          It's different, not more or less dangerous. Hydrogen leaks much more easily because it has such small molecules, but it also disperses much quicker, and doesn't hang around on the floor like propane as it's lighter than air.

          The energy and speed of a hydrogen explosion is much faster and more violent than propane, and the pressures developed are higher. You'd be surprised how freaking loud a hydrogen explosion is with just a liter of enclosed gas. It's not a squeaky pop like you get at school, more like a gun going off.

          It's much easier to ignite hydrogen with an electrical spark - it has the lowest spark ignition energy of any gas or vapour.

          And that concludes the combustion science lecture for today.

          I was only joking

          LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
          • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

            @taiwan_girl said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

            I think it is no more dangerous (maybe less so) than propane tanks currently in cars/taxis/buses etc.

            It's different, not more or less dangerous. Hydrogen leaks much more easily because it has such small molecules, but it also disperses much quicker, and doesn't hang around on the floor like propane as it's lighter than air.

            The energy and speed of a hydrogen explosion is much faster and more violent than propane, and the pressures developed are higher. You'd be surprised how freaking loud a hydrogen explosion is with just a liter of enclosed gas. It's not a squeaky pop like you get at school, more like a gun going off.

            It's much easier to ignite hydrogen with an electrical spark - it has the lowest spark ignition energy of any gas or vapour.

            And that concludes the combustion science lecture for today.

            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins Dad
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            @Doctor-Phibes said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

            @taiwan_girl said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

            I think it is no more dangerous (maybe less so) than propane tanks currently in cars/taxis/buses etc.

            It's different, not more or less dangerous. Hydrogen leaks much more easily because it has such small molecules, but it also disperses much quicker, and doesn't hang around on the floor like propane as it's lighter than air.

            The energy and speed of a hydrogen explosion is much faster and more violent than propane, and the pressures developed are higher. You'd be surprised how freaking loud a hydrogen explosion is with just a liter of enclosed gas. It's not a squeaky pop like you get at school, more like a gun going off.

            It's much easier to ignite hydrogen with an electrical spark - it has the lowest spark ignition energy of any gas or vapour.

            And that concludes the combustion science lecture for today.

            Phibes, Phibes, Phibes… Everyone knows that water is made up of 2 parts hydrogen, and one part oxygen. We also know that oxygen is EXTREMELY combustible… Now, as water is obviously not combustible, and in fact is so non combustible that we pour it on fires to put them out, then it is painfully obvious that hydrogen can not be combustible and in fact, has to likely be the most non flammable material in all existence.

            It’s simple science.

            The Brad

            Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
            • CopperC Copper

              Hydrogen

              09474104-329e-4081-aab9-cf2239398690-image.png

              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              @Copper said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

              Hydrogen

              09474104-329e-4081-aab9-cf2239398690-image.png

              Nazi misinformation.

              The Brad

              Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
              • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                @Copper said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

                Hydrogen

                09474104-329e-4081-aab9-cf2239398690-image.png

                Nazi misinformation.

                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                Doctor Phibes
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                @LuFins-Dad said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

                @Copper said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

                Hydrogen

                09474104-329e-4081-aab9-cf2239398690-image.png

                Nazi misinformation.

                Funnily enough, the majority of the fire wasn't hydrogen burning, but oil and superstructure. A hydrogen fire is almost invisible and doesn't produce smoke.

                I was only joking

                1 Reply Last reply
                • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                  @Doctor-Phibes said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

                  @taiwan_girl said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

                  I think it is no more dangerous (maybe less so) than propane tanks currently in cars/taxis/buses etc.

                  It's different, not more or less dangerous. Hydrogen leaks much more easily because it has such small molecules, but it also disperses much quicker, and doesn't hang around on the floor like propane as it's lighter than air.

                  The energy and speed of a hydrogen explosion is much faster and more violent than propane, and the pressures developed are higher. You'd be surprised how freaking loud a hydrogen explosion is with just a liter of enclosed gas. It's not a squeaky pop like you get at school, more like a gun going off.

                  It's much easier to ignite hydrogen with an electrical spark - it has the lowest spark ignition energy of any gas or vapour.

                  And that concludes the combustion science lecture for today.

                  Phibes, Phibes, Phibes… Everyone knows that water is made up of 2 parts hydrogen, and one part oxygen. We also know that oxygen is EXTREMELY combustible… Now, as water is obviously not combustible, and in fact is so non combustible that we pour it on fires to put them out, then it is painfully obvious that hydrogen can not be combustible and in fact, has to likely be the most non flammable material in all existence.

                  It’s simple science.

                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor Phibes
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  @LuFins-Dad said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

                  Phibes, Phibes, Phibes… Everyone knows that water is made up of 2 parts hydrogen, and one part oxygen. We also know that oxygen is EXTREMELY combustible… Now, as water is obviously not combustible, and in fact is so non combustible that we pour it on fires to put them out, then it is painfully obvious that hydrogen can not be combustible and in fact, has to likely be the most non flammable material in all existence.

                  It’s simple science.

                  OK, smart guy, if hydrogen is so safe how come they make atomic bombs out of it?

                  I was only joking

                  LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Actually, a lot of the Hindenburg fire is probably traceable to the dope used on the fabric...

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

                      Phibes, Phibes, Phibes… Everyone knows that water is made up of 2 parts hydrogen, and one part oxygen. We also know that oxygen is EXTREMELY combustible… Now, as water is obviously not combustible, and in fact is so non combustible that we pour it on fires to put them out, then it is painfully obvious that hydrogen can not be combustible and in fact, has to likely be the most non flammable material in all existence.

                      It’s simple science.

                      OK, smart guy, if hydrogen is so safe how come they make atomic bombs out of it?

                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins Dad
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      @Doctor-Phibes said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Who's afraid of the Big Green Hydrogen?:

                      Phibes, Phibes, Phibes… Everyone knows that water is made up of 2 parts hydrogen, and one part oxygen. We also know that oxygen is EXTREMELY combustible… Now, as water is obviously not combustible, and in fact is so non combustible that we pour it on fires to put them out, then it is painfully obvious that hydrogen can not be combustible and in fact, has to likely be the most non flammable material in all existence.

                      It’s simple science.

                      OK, smart guy, if hydrogen is so safe how come they make atomic bombs out of it?

                      It’s the atoms, not the hydrogen…

                      And atomic bombs aren’t anywhere near as bad as nuclear bombs.

                      The Brad

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                        Doctor Phibes
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Maybe the Hindenburg was actually a failed Nazi nucular attack on the US of A.

                        Hey, it could happen! Canada was close by.

                        I was only joking

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          My uncle was an eyewitness to the Hindenburg disaster.

                          "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                          -Cormac McCarthy

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups