Evidence technician request
-
@George-K said in Evidence technician request:
Maybe one reason:
QUOTE
It takes a pistol that normally requires, one, squeezing the trigger per round to fire, and turns it into a fully-automatic machine gun, meaning that the pistol will continue to fire as long as there's triggers held down, and there was ammunition in the weapon. What this does, it does a couple things. First of all, it puts the police officers at a tremendous disadvantage, because they're firing legitimate weapons, which fire one shot per pull the trigger. They can't match the speed of the rounds that are being put out by a fully automatic pistol," said retired CPD Chief of Detectives Eugene Roy.
UNQUOTE -
Hmm. I disagree. If you are trying to aim, and have a 50% chance of hitting the target, or if you are able to shoot 30 shots with each one having a 40% chance of hitting the target (and no two shots will be in the same location), I think there is a better chance of causing damage, either to the target or to a random bystander, etc.
Is it better to have an inaccurate shooter shooting one shot or 30?