Evidence technician request
-
@George-K said in Evidence technician request:
Maybe one reason:
QUOTE
It takes a pistol that normally requires, one, squeezing the trigger per round to fire, and turns it into a fully-automatic machine gun, meaning that the pistol will continue to fire as long as there's triggers held down, and there was ammunition in the weapon. What this does, it does a couple things. First of all, it puts the police officers at a tremendous disadvantage, because they're firing legitimate weapons, which fire one shot per pull the trigger. They can't match the speed of the rounds that are being put out by a fully automatic pistol," said retired CPD Chief of Detectives Eugene Roy.
UNQUOTE -
Hmm. I disagree. If you are trying to aim, and have a 50% chance of hitting the target, or if you are able to shoot 30 shots with each one having a 40% chance of hitting the target (and no two shots will be in the same location), I think there is a better chance of causing damage, either to the target or to a random bystander, etc.
Is it better to have an inaccurate shooter shooting one shot or 30?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login