Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. SCOTUS on Harvard and UNC

SCOTUS on Harvard and UNC

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
65 Posts 12 Posters 411 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JonJ Offline
    JonJ Offline
    Jon
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    I’m curious how much if any of the memorable exchange between Roberts and Sotomayor last time this issue arose shows up in the opinions.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Have you seen Thomas's smackdown?

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      89th8 1 Reply Last reply
      • 89th8 Offline
        89th8 Offline
        89th
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        I’d like links for both plz!

        1 Reply Last reply
        • JonJ Offline
          JonJ Offline
          Jon
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          I’ve not looked at any of this or read/heard any analysis. The ones I care about (e.g. scotusblog, advisory opinions! etc) can’t be written an hour after the ruling.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JonJ Jon

            Cool, let’s make this about me. 👍

            I’m interested in Sotomayor’s dissent, but largely to see how legally illiterate it is. If Kagan wrote also I’d read it, she’s the best writer on the court. Not so interested in Jackson.

            HoraceH Offline
            HoraceH Offline
            Horace
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            @Jon said in SCOTUS on Harvard and UNC:

            Cool, let’s make this about me. 👍

            Please don't pretend to be above it, it's gross when you do that.

            I’m interested in Sotomayor’s dissent, but largely to see how legally illiterate it is. If Kagan wrote also I’d read it, she’s the best writer on the court. Not so interested in Jackson.

            They all get an equal vote. You should be interested not least in the justice your guy nominated, if only to calibrate your expectations for future nominations.

            Education is extremely important.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • X Offline
              X Offline
              xenon
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              A numeric look at how racist selective programs can actually be. Here’s some AMA data on med school admission by race:

              alt text

              George KG 1 Reply Last reply
              • X xenon

                A numeric look at how racist selective programs can actually be. Here’s some AMA data on med school admission by race:

                alt text

                George KG Offline
                George KG Offline
                George K
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                @xenon said in SCOTUS on Harvard and UNC:

                A numeric look at how racist selective programs can actually be. Here’s some AMA data on med school admission by race.

                Law school

                https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1674427966842093573.html

                1/ Over the more than 50 years affirmative action's morally squalid and racist practices were in place, how many white and Asian applicants were denied admission in favor of less qualified black and Hispanic applicants? I was likely one of them, and maybe you were, too.

                2/ Years ago, I applied to a top law school, and was rejected.

                My GPA: 0.3 points higher than average GPA of blacks admitted

                My LSAT: Higher than the average at this school

                Average LSAT of blacks admitted: MUCH lower than my score and the white average

                3/ My undergrad degree: In a program ranked #1 in nation.

                Also: I had received academic awards, had a book published by an academic imprint as an undergrad, had glowing recommendations from well-known scholars.

                4/ A few years after I was rejected, the admission records of the law school leaked, and the data appeared in the media. There was a stat I've never forgotten: About 1 out of every 7 blacks admitted dropped out. The white drop-out rate was essentially zero.

                5/ So dozens of qualified white and Asian applicants who would have graduated had they been admitted were denied admission in favor of black admits who dropped out because they had no business being admitted in the first place.

                6/ The way that liberals in the media processed the information in this leak is what drove me from the left and toward the center. There's something deeply disordered about the American left's moral compass and sense of fairness.

                6/ Overwhelmingly, it wasn't disadvantaged BIPOCs benefiting from affirmative action, but rather middle-class ones who attended good K-12 schools. And yet liberals pretended not only that affirmative action was social justice but also that whites and Asians were not harmed.

                7/ Of course it's entirely possible I wouldn't have gotten into that law school even if there hadn't been affirmative action. But over 90% of the black applicants who got in under AA wouldn't have either.

                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • X Offline
                  X Offline
                  xenon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  Harvard’s data:

                  alt text

                  LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                  • HoraceH Offline
                    HoraceH Offline
                    Horace
                    wrote on last edited by Horace
                    #29

                    If it's the middle class black kids benefiting most, then it's the middle class black kids who still have the below average MCATs and GPAs.

                    If we move to poor preference instead of skin color preference, I wonder how the MCAT and GPA statistics per racial group, will change. If they're admitting the middle class minorities with normal wealth/culture advantages now, what would you get if you got more poor minorities instead?

                    Education is extremely important.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins Dad
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      This Democrat just said the quiet part out loud…

                      The Brad

                      JonJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      • HoraceH Offline
                        HoraceH Offline
                        Horace
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        Impossible to tell the difference between a parody account and a real one, when it comes to libtards.

                        Education is extremely important.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • George KG Offline
                          George KG Offline
                          George K
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          Justice Jackson writes:

                          image.jpeg

                          Wait, what???

                          So right away that’s not a doubling of anything.

                          But the ceteris isn’t paribus. The white docs aren’t seeing the same infants as the black docs. They’re more likely to get the NICU cases where all infants are less likely to survive, and study doesn’t control for that.

                          So the study is confusing correlation with causation: if you have a black doctor, your baby is more likely to survive, but that’s because that means you’re less likely to be in the NICU, where there are fewer black doctors. It has nothing to do with the race of the doctor.

                          Anyway, anyone want to place a bet whether the game of telephone works and takes a bad legal writeup of a bad study and the entirely fictional (but striking!) claim in the brief ends up in a SCOTUS opinion?

                          I read the wrong chart, in part because the study’s meaningful data is in an appendix. The difference is 99.96% vs 99.91%. And the difference isn’t even statistically significant.

                          Haven’t listened to this @VPrasadMDMPH podcast yet. Public policy community refuted it contemporaneously when the study came out. Knew the study would be pushed to SCOTUS (I’m sure it’s mentioned in other briefs); just didn’t think the dishonesty of the study would be multiplied.

                          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                          HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                          • George KG Offline
                            George KG Offline
                            George K
                            wrote on last edited by George K
                            #33

                            Thomas's concurrance...

                            FzzLbTkX0AIhwC5.png

                            image.jpeg

                            image.png

                            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins Dad
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #34

                              Jackson’s opinion is all ethics, morals, and bad math. What it doesn’t address is whether it’s constitutional.

                              The Brad

                              George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                              • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                Jackson’s opinion is all ethics, morals, and bad math. What it doesn’t address is whether it’s constitutional.

                                George KG Offline
                                George KG Offline
                                George K
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #35

                                @LuFins-Dad said in SCOTUS on Harvard and UNC:

                                Jackson’s opinion is all ethics, morals, and bad math. What it doesn’t address is whether it’s constitutional.

                                It's what she perceives as ethics and morals.

                                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • X xenon

                                  Harvard’s data:

                                  alt text

                                  LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins Dad
                                  wrote on last edited by LuFins Dad
                                  #36

                                  @xenon said in SCOTUS on Harvard and UNC:

                                  Harvard’s data:

                                  alt text

                                  May I ask why they don’t just take the 100% of all applicants at the top 2-3 deciles and 0% of the rest?

                                  Regardless of race?

                                  The Brad

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • CopperC Offline
                                    CopperC Offline
                                    Copper
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #37

                                    So, all this will eventually lead to a massive wave of incompetence, sweeping across the country.

                                    When, exactly, will this happen?

                                    Is it happening now?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • taiwan_girlT Offline
                                      taiwan_girlT Offline
                                      taiwan_girl
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #38

                                      Good decision. I think that colleges are better off if there is greater diversity in the schools, but admitting someone just because of their race is not the way to do it.

                                      That does not address the "root" reason why (for example) black kids are so far behind when they apply to college.

                                      And that does not explain why (for example) Asian kids do better than their % of the population.

                                      I grew up poor - neither parent had more than grade 8 education, I had no indoor plumbing as a kid, and when we did get a water pipe into the house, it was cold water only. You wanted hot water, you boiled it up on the stove. I think my first real hot water shower was when I went to college.

                                      BUT, and this is important, my parents knew the importance of education. It was ingrain in me from the time I was small. Study hard, do what it takes. I know I am not any smarter than an average black kid in the US, so if I can do it, they can too.

                                      This attitude has to be ingrain in them also. Not sure how to do that.

                                      However, waiting until they apply to college is too late.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • George KG Offline
                                        George KG Offline
                                        George K
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #39

                                        Almost not mentioned by most of the big media outlets is that this lawsuit was brought by Asian kids.

                                        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • JollyJ Offline
                                          JollyJ Offline
                                          Jolly
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #40

                                          I assume that Jackson has dropped Thomas from her Christmas list...

                                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups