"What is a woman?" Now on Twitter.
-
-
@Horace said in "What is a woman?" Now on Twitter.:
Matt Walsh’s work
Yep. I saw it a couple months ago. The ending is hilarious.
-
I generally find him annoying, but somebody sent us Johnny the Walrus and I admit to laughing at it.
The Brad
-
-
I generally find him annoying, but somebody sent us Johnny the Walrus and I admit to laughing at it.
@LuFins-Dad said in "What is a woman?" Now on Twitter.:
I generally find him annoying, but somebody sent us Johnny the Walrus and I admit to laughing at it.
I like him, mostly because he's pretty funny. He's not hugely thoughtful, but a conservative doesn't need to be very thoughtful in order to make good points. The left denies so many obvious truths, a conservative pundit can just talk about them, and the audience is there, to breathe a sigh of relief that not everybody is an indoctrinated crazy person.
-
Watched 10 minutes, I think I’m going to pause right here and propose a TNCR watch party…
-
@George-K said in "What is a woman?" Now on Twitter.:
Nah. It gets pretty respective. 10 minutes is all you need.
It was (though the Gender Studies professor was particularly hilarious) up and until they brought Scott Newgent in. She/he was a powerful voice and completely changed the tenor.
Peterson was Peterson, but Debra Soh and the red headed counselor were powerful as well.
-
@George-K I figured, and it was. And I could have done without the complete self-aggrandizing section about him coming to Loudoun and the Dr. Phil show, but overall it was still a good documentary. And the ending was mildly funny…
-
It's surprising so many of these people agreed to be interviewed and filmed.
-
@Jon said in "What is a woman?" Now on Twitter.:
It's surprising so many of these people agreed to be interviewed and filmed.
Simple. They thought they would look good. They are in the right, they are the intelligent and educated individuals on this matter, no way this Neanderthal could win this debate.
The Brad
-
Exactly, I'm sure they signed the paper ahead of time thinking "I can use my education and logic that has never been challenged..." until they are asked the simple question. The circular logic segment with the gender studies professor reminded me of an old debate I had with Larry about stealing... he would say "stealing is stealing" but we'd go at it to try and define it further. That was in regards to downloading music, btw.
-
@Jon said in "What is a woman?" Now on Twitter.:
It's surprising so many of these people agreed to be interviewed and filmed.
Simple. They thought they would look good. They are in the right, they are the intelligent and educated individuals on this matter, no way this Neanderthal could win this debate.
@LuFins-Dad said in "What is a woman?" Now on Twitter.:
@Jon said in "What is a woman?" Now on Twitter.:
It's surprising so many of these people agreed to be interviewed and filmed.
Simple. They thought they would look good. They are in the right, they are the intelligent and educated individuals on this matter, no way this Neanderthal could win this debate.
That's some of them.
Others, you can tell, are walking talking Dunnong-Kruger examples.
Please love yourself.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in "What is a woman?" Now on Twitter.:
@Jon said in "What is a woman?" Now on Twitter.:
It's surprising so many of these people agreed to be interviewed and filmed.
Simple. They thought they would look good. They are in the right, they are the intelligent and educated individuals on this matter, no way this Neanderthal could win this debate.
That's some of them.
Others, you can tell, are walking talking Dunnong-Kruger examples.
@Aqua-Letifer said in "What is a woman?" Now on Twitter.:
@LuFins-Dad said in "What is a woman?" Now on Twitter.:
@Jon said in "What is a woman?" Now on Twitter.:
It's surprising so many of these people agreed to be interviewed and filmed.
Simple. They thought they would look good. They are in the right, they are the intelligent and educated individuals on this matter, no way this Neanderthal could win this debate.
That's some of them.
Others, you can tell, are walking talking Dunnong-Kruger examples.
I guess that's what people mean when they say "educated beyond their intelligence", but I don't care for that phrase, in that those people are not educated. They are only trained in a skill, similar to any trainable animal for any trainable skill. The skill in question is to parrot certain "ideas" (using that term loosely as well), in certain rote rhetorical ways.
