Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Seven

The Seven

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
6 Posts 3 Posters 54 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/democrats-advance-seven-biden-judicial-nominees-gop-support-feinstein-rcna80527

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Offline
      MikM Offline
      Mik
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Poor babies. They had to seek consensus. The Founding Fathers smiled.

      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

      1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I find it interesting that consensus could be reached. Can't demagogue that which you cannot change,

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girl
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I think I posted before about the votes for US Supreme Court judges. Generally, those nominated by Democratic presidents have a higher vote total than those by Republican presidents.

          So, depending on how you want to interpret:

          1. Republicans are more willing to work with Democrats on Supreme Court judges

          2. Democrats are more willing to nominate middle of the road Supreme Court judges

          3. Republicans nominate more radical Supreme Court judges

          4. Democrats do not work well with Republicans on this issue.

          LOL

          Depending upon which side you are on, you can make the data fit your argument. Same is true for the article posted above. I am pretty sure that these judges were nominated long before Senator Feinstiens medical issues.

          JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

            I think I posted before about the votes for US Supreme Court judges. Generally, those nominated by Democratic presidents have a higher vote total than those by Republican presidents.

            So, depending on how you want to interpret:

            1. Republicans are more willing to work with Democrats on Supreme Court judges

            2. Democrats are more willing to nominate middle of the road Supreme Court judges

            3. Republicans nominate more radical Supreme Court judges

            4. Democrats do not work well with Republicans on this issue.

            LOL

            Depending upon which side you are on, you can make the data fit your argument. Same is true for the article posted above. I am pretty sure that these judges were nominated long before Senator Feinstiens medical issues.

            JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @taiwan_girl said in The Seven:

            I think I posted before about the votes for US Supreme Court judges. Generally, those nominated by Democratic presidents have a higher vote total than those by Republican presidents.

            So, depending on how you want to interpret:

            1. Republicans are more willing to work with Democrats on Supreme Court judges

            2. Democrats are more willing to nominate middle of the road Supreme Court judges

            3. Republicans nominate more radical Supreme Court judges

            4. Democrats do not work well with Republicans on this issue.

            LOL

            Depending upon which side you are on, you can make the data fit your argument. Same is true for the article posted above. I am pretty sure that these judges were nominated long before Senator Feinstiens medical issues.

            You did notice that not all nominated judges were confirmed?

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Jolly

              @taiwan_girl said in The Seven:

              I think I posted before about the votes for US Supreme Court judges. Generally, those nominated by Democratic presidents have a higher vote total than those by Republican presidents.

              So, depending on how you want to interpret:

              1. Republicans are more willing to work with Democrats on Supreme Court judges

              2. Democrats are more willing to nominate middle of the road Supreme Court judges

              3. Republicans nominate more radical Supreme Court judges

              4. Democrats do not work well with Republicans on this issue.

              LOL

              Depending upon which side you are on, you can make the data fit your argument. Same is true for the article posted above. I am pretty sure that these judges were nominated long before Senator Feinstiens medical issues.

              You did notice that not all nominated judges were confirmed?

              taiwan_girlT Offline
              taiwan_girlT Offline
              taiwan_girl
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @Jolly I did see that. But I think my point is still valid.

              If you are a Democrat, you would look at the nominations and say, "In general, Democrats are more willing to put up judges that are acceptable to both parties."

              If you are Republic, you would look at the nominations and say, "In general, Republics are more willing to work with Democrats to confirm judges"

              1 Reply Last reply
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Groups