Go Magat, Go Broke
-
@Catseye3 said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
Kimberly Guilfoyle
She's certifiably crazy.
Want proof? She
wasismarried to Gavin Newsomdating Don Jr.And then, there's all that naked stuff....
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 20:48 last edited by@George-K said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
@Catseye3 said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
Kimberly Guilfoyle
She's certifiably crazy.
Want proof? She
wasismarried to Gavin Newsomdating Don Jr.And then, there's all that naked stuff....
Naked stuff? <perk>
-
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 20:54 last edited by
I wonder if they have to say/print/broadcast something publicly.
-
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 20:55 last edited by
@Axtremus said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
” keyword, you get one result from two days ago about the case about to do onto trial.
https://www.google.com/advanced_search?hl=en
https://press.foxnews.com/2023/04/fox-news-and-dominion-voting-systems-reach-settlement
-
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 20:55 last edited by
I wish Sandman had gotten a public statement from his defendants, but I think he only got money.
-
@Axtremus said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
” keyword, you get one result from two days ago about the case about to do onto trial.
https://www.google.com/advanced_search?hl=en
https://press.foxnews.com/2023/04/fox-news-and-dominion-voting-systems-reach-settlement
-
Yes but that’s a corporate press release, like any company might issue. It didn’t get broadcast on their channels.
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 21:00 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
. It didn’t get broadcast on their channels.
Cavuto is talking about it right now.
-
@jon-nyc said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
. It didn’t get broadcast on their channels.
Cavuto is talking about it right now.
-
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 21:03 last edited by
@George-K said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
$787.5 Million.
Fear not Tucker can probably cover it.
“How much is $787.5 million for Fox? A recent corporate filing showed that the Fox Corporation had about $4.1 billion “of cash and cash equivalents” on hand at the end of last year.”
So they won’t go broke, but no matter how much money you have you don’t want to give away a fifth of it.
-
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 21:33 last edited by
A Twitter Lawyer:
"The judge had ruled the statements made by Fox were false, meaning the jury would be told that several elements of defamation had been determined, leaving the fight over malice and money. Hence the 11th hour settlement."
-
CNN has the sads that a settlement was reached.
"Chump change."
Who you gonna believe, CNN or @jon-nyc ?
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 22:52 last edited by@George-K said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
CNN has the sads that a settlement was reached.
Misery loves company.
-
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 22:57 last edited by
I see that with many on social media. They wanted to humiliate Fox more than compensate Dominion. I’m sure Dominion got more or less what they wanted here.
-
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 23:17 last edited by
Well, Fox really, really, really did not want to go to trial.
-
wrote on 18 Apr 2023, 23:18 last edited by
@Mik said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
Well, Fox really, really, really did not want to go to trial.
And have Hannity, et al testify? Of course not!
-
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 02:40 last edited by
This settlement is second only to the Alex Jones verdict in size for libel.
The difference is, Jones will never pay the full 965MM as he doesn’t have it.
That sort of makes this #1.
-
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 04:35 last edited by
And two weeks from now, the public will go "What?" .
-
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 12:00 last edited by
-
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 15:52 last edited by
It will be intersesting if Fox News personalities (and other news shows) change their talking during the next elections.
-
It will be intersesting if Fox News personalities (and other news shows) change their talking during the next elections.
wrote on 19 Apr 2023, 16:02 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Go Magat, Go Broke:
It will be intersesting if Fox News personalities (and other news shows) change their talking during the next elections.
Nah.
I'm still waiting for Rachel Maddow to apologize and for the New York Times to return the Pulitzer.
