Is this Aqua?

[89th]

Reminds me of something @Aqua-Letifer would ask:

[George K]

[Aqua Letifer]

I would say "fuck's" would be the most appropriate usage. That is, for the sake of the fucks (or fucking more generally, I suppose) that are allegedly on the line, due to the situation at-hand.

Somewhat related: I recently took the opportunity to use the word "troglodyte" in an intra-office communiqué.

[LuFins Dad]

I was thinking “For the sake of fvck” as well, so the possessive is definitely appropriate.

[Axtremus]

@Aqua-Letifer said in Is this Aqua?:

I would say "fuck's" would be the most appropriate usage.

Agree, but also wonder if there is a case for fucks’, as in plural possessive, like for fucks’ sake.

[Horace]

People who brag about pluralities of that make me and other incels very jealous. Down with that sort of pluralization.

[Larry]

@George-K said in Is this Aqua?:

Look! A coon!!

[Jolly]

For the past couple of years, we have a coon that drops by and chows down on the cat food. My watchdog in the backyard is as smart as some humans and you can tell what's out there by the type bark you hear.

When I hear a couple of sharp barks, and then she goes quiet, I know my night visitor has shown up for supper.

BTW, the coon's name is Amal.

[Aqua Letifer]

@Jolly said in Is this Aqua?:

BTW, the coon's name is Amal.

Like the carburettor?

And I take it you're okay with his/her stopping by regularly?

[Jolly]

@Aqua-Letifer said in Is this Aqua?:

@Jolly said in Is this Aqua?:

BTW, the coon's name is Amal.

Like the carburettor?

And I take it you're okay with his/her stopping by regularly?

Like the opera.