Earth’s land mammals by weight
-
wrote on 6 Feb 2023, 11:31 last edited by
Wow.
-
wrote on 6 Feb 2023, 12:49 last edited by
Weight is a very negative way to describe weight. Couldn't they think of a less judgmental term?
-
Weight is a very negative way to describe weight. Couldn't they think of a less judgmental term?
wrote on 6 Feb 2023, 12:53 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Earth’s land mammals by weight:
Weight is a very negative way to describe weight. Couldn't they think of a less judgmental term?
Twat.
-
wrote on 6 Feb 2023, 12:54 last edited by
TTIWWOB
-
wrote on 6 Feb 2023, 13:17 last edited by
-
wrote on 6 Feb 2023, 15:15 last edited by
Interesting. Would have been interesting to see insect life included.
(I am sure you have heard of the "fact" that the weight of all ants in the world is greater than the weight of all humans. (Dont know whether or not that is true however, but it is interesting.))
-
@jon-nyc interesting.
What's that between goats and pigs, or to the right of sheep?
I've read that the biomass of insects and arachnids exceeds even this.
wrote on 8 Feb 2023, 18:59 last edited by@George-K said in Earth’s land mammals by weight:
I've read that the biomass of insects and arachnids exceeds even this.
Yup, they're the red section. Also, the weight of bacteria WTF.
