Chinese Spy Balloon
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 22:39 last edited by
And nuclear sites of interest:
-
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 22:53 last edited by
I've seen some of those missile sites, there is nothing to see, at least for the Titan III that are all underground.
And if there were something to see, it's been seen decades ago. Matter of fact, I think there have been several forum members that have toured Davis-Monthan as well as tours of the missile museums. -
wrote on 3 Feb 2023, 23:03 last edited by
I'm thinking the main reason to do this isn't actually to gather intelligence, but to send some kind of message and also to see how the US reacts.
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 01:13 last edited by
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 01:21 last edited by
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 02:15 last edited by
@George-K said in Chinese Spy Balloon:
Is this something?
A weather balloon shooting down an F16.
Or maybe vice versa.
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 11:43 last edited by
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 11:44 last edited by
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 12:32 last edited by
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 13:20 last edited by
Perfect meme fodder.
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 15:46 last edited by
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 16:13 last edited by
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 20:06 last edited by
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 21:22 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Chinese Spy Balloon:
Nice of us to wait until it had gotten all the pictures it needed.
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 21:36 last edited by jon-nyc 2 Apr 2023, 21:36
2 questions about the spy balloon…
Was it really too dangerous to shoot it down over fucking Montana? There’s like half a person per square parsec in that state. Makes me think they were worried about dangerous materials on board. (Rank speculation)
The DoD said it didn’t provide any capability the CCP didn’t already have through satellites. Oh really? How do they know? And if that’s true, why did the CCP bother?
-
2 questions about the spy balloon…
Was it really too dangerous to shoot it down over fucking Montana? There’s like half a person per square parsec in that state. Makes me think they were worried about dangerous materials on board. (Rank speculation)
The DoD said it didn’t provide any capability the CCP didn’t already have through satellites. Oh really? How do they know? And if that’s true, why did the CCP bother?
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 21:53 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Chinese Spy Balloon:
2 questions about the spy balloon…
Was it really too dangerous to shoot it down over fucking Montana? There’s like half a person per square parsec in that state. Makes me think they were worried about dangerous materials on board. (Rank speculation)
Here's a suggestion, how about shooting it down over the Aleutian islands, when it was first spotted? It's even more sparsely populated there than Montana.
The DoD said it didn’t provide any capability the CCP didn’t already have through satellites. Oh really? How do they know? And if that’s true, why did the CCP bother?
Excellent points.
Now, what about the OTHER balloon going over Latin America right now?
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 21:54 last edited by
-
@jon-nyc said in Chinese Spy Balloon:
2 questions about the spy balloon…
Was it really too dangerous to shoot it down over fucking Montana? There’s like half a person per square parsec in that state. Makes me think they were worried about dangerous materials on board. (Rank speculation)
Here's a suggestion, how about shooting it down over the Aleutian islands, when it was first spotted? It's even more sparsely populated there than Montana.
The DoD said it didn’t provide any capability the CCP didn’t already have through satellites. Oh really? How do they know? And if that’s true, why did the CCP bother?
Excellent points.
Now, what about the OTHER balloon going over Latin America right now?
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 21:57 last edited by@George-K said in Chinese Spy Balloon:
@jon-nyc said in Chinese Spy Balloon:
2 questions about the spy balloon…
Here's a suggestion, how about shooting it down over the Aleutian islands, when it was first spotted? It's even more sparsely populated there than Montana.
Yeah, I was thinking that too.
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 22:00 last edited by
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2023, 22:17 last edited by 89th 2 Apr 2023, 22:18
