Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”

Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
95 Posts 11 Posters 1.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L LuFins Dad
    17 Jan 2024, 13:55

    I think the constant attacks from the left have driven him into this much more across the board conservative political position, he is where they have pushed him to be.

    I would like to see him go to the reeducation clinics and film them. Challenge them when necessary and appropriate.

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 14:01 last edited by
    #69

    @LuFins-Dad said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

    I think the constant attacks from the left have driven him into this much more across the board conservative political position, he is where they have pushed him to be.

    I would like to see him go to the reeducation clinics and film them. Challenge them when necessary and appropriate.

    Absolutely. The video may do an epic amount of good.

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • L LuFins Dad
      17 Jan 2024, 13:55

      I think the constant attacks from the left have driven him into this much more across the board conservative political position, he is where they have pushed him to be.

      I would like to see him go to the reeducation clinics and film them. Challenge them when necessary and appropriate.

      G Offline
      G Offline
      George K
      wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 14:02 last edited by
      #70

      @Renauda said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

      https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/exclusive-jordan-peterson-loses-fight-with-psychology-college-over-mandatory-social-media-training/wcm/996bd4ba-9061-4169-a1fd-845fabd1ae90/amp/

      Essentially the courts do not want to get involved in disputes between licensed professions and their regulatory colleges.

      Interesting take. Probably accurate too.

      @LuFins-Dad said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

      I would like to see him go to the reeducation clinics and film them

      He claims he will be recording the proceedings.

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • H Offline
        H Offline
        Horace
        wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 14:22 last edited by
        #71

        He doesn’t practice anymore, this is just about the principle. I am sure anybody can relate to the frustration of being held accountable by nameless faceless people who do not explain themselves and who have no obligation to do so. Reminds me of an HOA.

        Education is extremely important.

        D R 2 Replies Last reply 17 Jan 2024, 14:26
        • H Horace
          17 Jan 2024, 14:22

          He doesn’t practice anymore, this is just about the principle. I am sure anybody can relate to the frustration of being held accountable by nameless faceless people who do not explain themselves and who have no obligation to do so. Reminds me of an HOA.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Doctor Phibes
          wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 14:26 last edited by
          #72

          @Horace said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

          I am sure anybody can relate to the frustration of being held accountable by nameless faceless people who do not explain themselves and who have no obligation to do so.

          I happen to work in that area, and find your comments deeply offensive.

          I was only joking

          1 Reply Last reply
          • H Horace
            17 Jan 2024, 14:22

            He doesn’t practice anymore, this is just about the principle. I am sure anybody can relate to the frustration of being held accountable by nameless faceless people who do not explain themselves and who have no obligation to do so. Reminds me of an HOA.

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Renauda
            wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 15:15 last edited by Renauda
            #73

            @Horace

            I am sure anybody can relate to the frustration of being held accountable by nameless faceless people who do not explain themselves and who have no obligation to do so.

            That is how it is for regulated professions like psychologists, speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, physio-therapists, physicians and surgeons, engineers, architects, geologists, barristers and solicitors, accountants and pharmacists to name but a few. Generally it is understood and accepted and in the case of health care professionals appreciated when employers attempt to assign duties and responsibilities upon their membership that is outside of their scope of practice. The regulatory college intervenes on behalf of its membership. All provincial regulatory colleges have set codes of conduct which the members must agree to adhere in order to maintain to their license to practice within the jurisdiction of the College.

            Dr. Peterson would not only know and understand this but would also accept it.

            Elbows up!

            H 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jan 2024, 15:35
            • R Renauda
              17 Jan 2024, 15:15

              @Horace

              I am sure anybody can relate to the frustration of being held accountable by nameless faceless people who do not explain themselves and who have no obligation to do so.

              That is how it is for regulated professions like psychologists, speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, physio-therapists, physicians and surgeons, engineers, architects, geologists, barristers and solicitors, accountants and pharmacists to name but a few. Generally it is understood and accepted and in the case of health care professionals appreciated when employers attempt to assign duties and responsibilities upon their membership that is outside of their scope of practice. The regulatory college intervenes on behalf of its membership. All provincial regulatory colleges have set codes of conduct which the members must agree to adhere in order to maintain to their license to practice within the jurisdiction of the College.

              Dr. Peterson would not only know and understand this but would also accept it.

              H Offline
              H Offline
              Horace
              wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 15:35 last edited by
              #74

              @Renauda said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

              @Horace

              I am sure anybody can relate to the frustration of being held accountable by nameless faceless people who do not explain themselves and who have no obligation to do so.

              That is how it is for regulated professions like psychologists, speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, physio-therapists, physicians and surgeons, engineers, geologists, barristers and solicitors, accountants and pharmacists to name but a few. Generally it is understood and accepted and in the case of health care professionals appreciated when employers attempt to assign duties and responsibilities upon their membership that is outside of their scope of practice. The regulatory college intervenes on behalf of its membership. All provincial regulatory colleges have set codes of conduct which the members must agree to adhere in order to maintain to their license to practice within the jurisdiction of the College.

              Dr. Peterson would not only know and understand this but would also accept it.

              None of that is a justification for an opaque process in which the authorities do not explain themselves.

              Education is extremely important.

              R 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jan 2024, 16:05
              • D Offline
                D Offline
                Doctor Phibes
                wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 15:38 last edited by Doctor Phibes
                #75

                I'm pretty sure my employer would object strongly if I posted all the stuff that JP does under my own name.

                I was only joking

                H 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jan 2024, 15:41
                • D Doctor Phibes
                  17 Jan 2024, 15:38

                  I'm pretty sure my employer would object strongly if I posted all the stuff that JP does under my own name.

                  H Offline
                  H Offline
                  Horace
                  wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 15:41 last edited by
                  #76

                  @Doctor-Phibes said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

                  I'm pretty sure my employer would object strongly if I posted all the stuff that JP does under my own name.

                  It's a licensing board, not an employer. It would be more appropriate to say they work for him. Again not unlike an HOA.

                  Education is extremely important.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • H Horace
                    17 Jan 2024, 15:35

                    @Renauda said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

                    @Horace

                    I am sure anybody can relate to the frustration of being held accountable by nameless faceless people who do not explain themselves and who have no obligation to do so.

                    That is how it is for regulated professions like psychologists, speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, physio-therapists, physicians and surgeons, engineers, geologists, barristers and solicitors, accountants and pharmacists to name but a few. Generally it is understood and accepted and in the case of health care professionals appreciated when employers attempt to assign duties and responsibilities upon their membership that is outside of their scope of practice. The regulatory college intervenes on behalf of its membership. All provincial regulatory colleges have set codes of conduct which the members must agree to adhere in order to maintain to their license to practice within the jurisdiction of the College.

                    Dr. Peterson would not only know and understand this but would also accept it.

                    None of that is a justification for an opaque process in which the authorities do not explain themselves.

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Renauda
                    wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 16:05 last edited by
                    #77

                    @Horace

                    None of that is a justification for an opaque process in which the authorities do not explain themselves..

                    Although I understand your position on the matter, the opaque process is justified through the respective provincial legislation that governs the mandate of each College. Dr. Peterson knows this and is free to petition his peers to introduce transparency to the process. The colleges are not run by provincial government appointees but by elected members of the profession by the membership at large. Likewise and as I stated already, Dr. Peterson would know this. Rather than crying to the law courts he should be petitioning the membership and seek election to his College’s BOD. If he has no support in such an endeavour then I would say it is not an issue that needs to be addressed.

                    Elbows up!

                    H 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jan 2024, 16:29
                    • R Renauda
                      17 Jan 2024, 16:05

                      @Horace

                      None of that is a justification for an opaque process in which the authorities do not explain themselves..

                      Although I understand your position on the matter, the opaque process is justified through the respective provincial legislation that governs the mandate of each College. Dr. Peterson knows this and is free to petition his peers to introduce transparency to the process. The colleges are not run by provincial government appointees but by elected members of the profession by the membership at large. Likewise and as I stated already, Dr. Peterson would know this. Rather than crying to the law courts he should be petitioning the membership and seek election to his College’s BOD. If he has no support in such an endeavour then I would say it is not an issue that needs to be addressed.

                      H Offline
                      H Offline
                      Horace
                      wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 16:29 last edited by
                      #78

                      @Renauda said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

                      @Horace

                      None of that is a justification for an opaque process in which the authorities do not explain themselves..

                      Although I understand your position on the matter, the opaque process is justified through the respective provincial legislation that governs the mandate of each College. Dr. Peterson knows this and is free to petition his peers to introduce transparency to the process. The colleges are not run by provincial government appointees but by elected members of the profession by the membership at large. Likewise and as I stated already, Dr. Peterson would know this. Rather than crying to the law courts he should be petitioning the membership and seek election to his College’s BOD. If he has no support in such an endeavour then I would say it is not an issue that needs to be addressed.

                      This could be used as a boilerplate defense of any institutionalized bureaucratic nonsense. Meanwhile, the nonsense itself might be interesting to investigate and discuss, to the extent there are details to investigate or discuss.

                      Education is extremely important.

                      R 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jan 2024, 16:43
                      • H Horace
                        17 Jan 2024, 16:29

                        @Renauda said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

                        @Horace

                        None of that is a justification for an opaque process in which the authorities do not explain themselves..

                        Although I understand your position on the matter, the opaque process is justified through the respective provincial legislation that governs the mandate of each College. Dr. Peterson knows this and is free to petition his peers to introduce transparency to the process. The colleges are not run by provincial government appointees but by elected members of the profession by the membership at large. Likewise and as I stated already, Dr. Peterson would know this. Rather than crying to the law courts he should be petitioning the membership and seek election to his College’s BOD. If he has no support in such an endeavour then I would say it is not an issue that needs to be addressed.

                        This could be used as a boilerplate defense of any institutionalized bureaucratic nonsense. Meanwhile, the nonsense itself might be interesting to investigate and discuss, to the extent there are details to investigate or discuss.

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Renauda
                        wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 16:43 last edited by Renauda
                        #79

                        @Horace

                        The practice of Psychological Counselling is a regulated heath care profession. For good reason too I should think.

                        It’s what it is; not what others like you and I on the outside might think it is or think it should be.

                        Elbows up!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Jolly
                          wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 17:31 last edited by
                          #80

                          What would it take to license Peterson in the U.S.?

                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                          R 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jan 2024, 19:10
                          • J Jolly
                            17 Jan 2024, 17:31

                            What would it take to license Peterson in the U.S.?

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Renauda
                            wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 19:10 last edited by
                            #81

                            @Jolly said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

                            What would it take to license Peterson in the in the U.S. in a province other than Ontario?

                            FIFY.

                            Dr. Peterson is well aware of the requirements for each province. He would have little problem opening a practice elsewhere other than Quebec, which likely has a French language proficiency requirement he would have to meet.

                            Elbows up!

                            H 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jan 2024, 21:07
                            • J Offline
                              J Offline
                              Jolly
                              wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 20:52 last edited by
                              #82

                              Want him in Alberta?

                              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                              R 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jan 2024, 23:04
                              • R Renauda
                                17 Jan 2024, 19:10

                                @Jolly said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

                                What would it take to license Peterson in the in the U.S. in a province other than Ontario?

                                FIFY.

                                Dr. Peterson is well aware of the requirements for each province. He would have little problem opening a practice elsewhere other than Quebec, which likely has a French language proficiency requirement he would have to meet.

                                H Offline
                                H Offline
                                Horace
                                wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 21:07 last edited by
                                #83

                                @Renauda said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

                                @Jolly said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

                                What would it take to license Peterson in the in the U.S. in a province other than Ontario?

                                FIFY.

                                Dr. Peterson is well aware of the requirements for each province. He would have little problem opening a practice elsewhere other than Quebec, which likely has a French language proficiency requirement he would have to meet.

                                He doesn't know exactly why his various tweets and conversations have run afoul of the public conduct rules. Whether the public conduct rules of other provinces would be violated would again be up to an opaque committee.

                                Education is extremely important.

                                R 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jan 2024, 23:43
                                • J Jolly
                                  17 Jan 2024, 20:52

                                  Want him in Alberta?

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Renauda
                                  wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 23:04 last edited by Renauda
                                  #84

                                  @Jolly said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

                                  Want him in Alberta?

                                  Sure why not? He was born here and did his undergraduate here. I also believe that he is a good educator and clinician.

                                  Besides that we like him here:

                                  Elbows up!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • H Horace
                                    17 Jan 2024, 21:07

                                    @Renauda said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

                                    @Jolly said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

                                    What would it take to license Peterson in the in the U.S. in a province other than Ontario?

                                    FIFY.

                                    Dr. Peterson is well aware of the requirements for each province. He would have little problem opening a practice elsewhere other than Quebec, which likely has a French language proficiency requirement he would have to meet.

                                    He doesn't know exactly why his various tweets and conversations have run afoul of the public conduct rules. Whether the public conduct rules of other provinces would be violated would again be up to an opaque committee.

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    Renauda
                                    wrote on 17 Jan 2024, 23:43 last edited by Renauda
                                    #85

                                    @Horace

                                    Whether the public conduct rules of other provinces would be violated would again be up to an opaque committee.

                                    I am certain Dr. Peterson is well aware of that risk. A hazard of qualifying for and maintaining the status of a licensed health care professional.

                                    Elbows up!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      Renauda
                                      wrote on 18 Jan 2024, 16:28 last edited by
                                      #86

                                      Jordan Peterson speaks out:

                                      https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jordan-peterson-bureaucrats-will-rue-the-day-they-tried-to-shut-me-up

                                      Elbows up!

                                      H 1 Reply Last reply 18 Jan 2024, 16:59
                                      • R Renauda
                                        18 Jan 2024, 16:28

                                        Jordan Peterson speaks out:

                                        https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jordan-peterson-bureaucrats-will-rue-the-day-they-tried-to-shut-me-up

                                        H Offline
                                        H Offline
                                        Horace
                                        wrote on 18 Jan 2024, 16:59 last edited by
                                        #87

                                        @Renauda said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

                                        Jordan Peterson speaks out:

                                        https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jordan-peterson-bureaucrats-will-rue-the-day-they-tried-to-shut-me-up

                                        Thanks for posting this. From the comments:

                                        This is getting so tiresome. Then don't do as the OCP has ruled DrJP, and give up your license but for the love of all that is good in this country, stop whining and get on with your life! You said yourself you don't need your license anymore. You entered into a profession that has a regulatory body and you knew going in that it had some requirements that you either work by or you don't work.

                                        The opposition always make it sound like he engaged in direct professional misconduct. But obviously his crime is to have engaged in the culture wars, against the mainstream, and in a public and successful manner. This is the mainstream culture fighting back against him. Of course this sort of action will have a chilling effect on any other licensed psychologist, who may agree with Peterson on political matters, but who needs their license to support themselves. That's a problem, for those of us who appreciate free speech. (A dying breed.)

                                        Education is extremely important.

                                        R 1 Reply Last reply 18 Jan 2024, 17:19
                                        • H Horace
                                          18 Jan 2024, 16:59

                                          @Renauda said in Jordan Peterson to get “retrained?”:

                                          Jordan Peterson speaks out:

                                          https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jordan-peterson-bureaucrats-will-rue-the-day-they-tried-to-shut-me-up

                                          Thanks for posting this. From the comments:

                                          This is getting so tiresome. Then don't do as the OCP has ruled DrJP, and give up your license but for the love of all that is good in this country, stop whining and get on with your life! You said yourself you don't need your license anymore. You entered into a profession that has a regulatory body and you knew going in that it had some requirements that you either work by or you don't work.

                                          The opposition always make it sound like he engaged in direct professional misconduct. But obviously his crime is to have engaged in the culture wars, against the mainstream, and in a public and successful manner. This is the mainstream culture fighting back against him. Of course this sort of action will have a chilling effect on any other licensed psychologist, who may agree with Peterson on political matters, but who needs their license to support themselves. That's a problem, for those of us who appreciate free speech. (A dying breed.)

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          Renauda
                                          wrote on 18 Jan 2024, 17:19 last edited by Renauda
                                          #88

                                          @Horace

                                          But obviously his crime is to have engaged in the culture wars, against the mainstream, and in a public and successful manner.

                                          The comment you posted suggests to me that the problem is not with Dr. Peterson but rather his colleagues in the profession. That may very well be the case, since “The Guild” does reflect and safeguard the prevailing trends of its membership with regard to professional conduct. In short, Dr. Peterson is surrounded by licensed useful idiots and has no allies on the inside willing to stand with him in his cause. If that is the case, I am frankly surprised. Surely, given his professional insight into personality, the good Doctor ought to have realized long ago that his colleagues in the profession were, by and large, flakes.

                                          Elbows up!

                                          H 1 Reply Last reply 18 Jan 2024, 17:28
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes

                                          78/95

                                          17 Jan 2024, 16:29


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          78 out of 95
                                          • First post
                                            78/95
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups