SBF/FTX
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2022, 22:47 last edited by
Ha. The NY Post buried it in p16 of a piece about his sex life.
I guess Murdoch inc wants to keep the SBF-Democrats narrative in play.
-
Ha. The NY Post buried it in p16 of a piece about his sex life.
I guess Murdoch inc wants to keep the SBF-Democrats narrative in play.
wrote on 30 Nov 2022, 22:59 last edited byHa. The NY Post buried it in p16 of a piece about his sex life.
I guess Murdoch inc wants to keep the SBF-Democrats narrative in play.
The narrative, which is still in play, is that soulless opportunists can be counted on to publicly espouse leftism. Obviously.
-
Ha. The NY Post buried it in p16 of a piece about his sex life.
I guess Murdoch inc wants to keep the SBF-Democrats narrative in play.
The narrative, which is still in play, is that soulless opportunists can be counted on to publicly espouse leftism. Obviously.
-
@Horace obviously not.
You think the guys pushing the Dems->Ukraine->FTX->Dems absurdity want to add the GOP to the lineup?
wrote on 30 Nov 2022, 23:08 last edited by@Horace obviously not.
You think the guys pushing the Dems->Ukraine->FTX->Dems absurdity want to add the GOP to the lineup?
I am sure that theory about money flow does not hold up to scrutiny. It is prominent in your mind because it's an easy win for your tribe, while the more important and meaningful narrative remains intact. SBF sought social advantage, and he did so by publicly siding unequivocally with the Dems.
-
@Horace obviously not.
You think the guys pushing the Dems->Ukraine->FTX->Dems absurdity want to add the GOP to the lineup?
I am sure that theory about money flow does not hold up to scrutiny. It is prominent in your mind because it's an easy win for your tribe, while the more important and meaningful narrative remains intact. SBF sought social advantage, and he did so by publicly siding unequivocally with the Dems.
-
Ok sure the GOP talking point can become “if you want to be high status join the other party” but somehow I don’t think that’s how Fox News will play it.
wrote on 30 Nov 2022, 23:26 last edited byOk sure the GOP talking point can become “if you want to be high status join the other party” but somehow I don’t think that’s how Fox News will play it.
It works perfectly well as it's already being played in pieces not devoted to the conspiracy theory you're dunking on. That the Dems are the party of soulless principle-free social climbers. I'm sure that narrative has more of a kernel of truth to it than the ever-popular narrative about the Republicans being the party of racists.
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2022, 00:57 last edited by
Fron USD $26 billion to USD$100K
https://www.axios.com/2022/11/29/sam-bankman-fried-100000-ftx-cftc-regulation
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2022, 03:21 last edited by
Let’s put it in perspective, 100k isn’t bad for an unemployed 30 year old.
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2022, 15:11 last edited by
More than I had at that age.
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2022, 15:19 last edited by
Hell, I'd be pushed to drum up $26 billion even now.
-
Hell, I'd be pushed to drum up $26 billion even now.
wrote on 1 Dec 2022, 15:38 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in SBF/FTX:
Hell, I'd be pushed to drum up $26 billion even now.
You might have some valuable collectible memorabilia from your childhood in a developing country. Progressives use canned haggis as display pieces on their coffee tables, to signal their solidarity with the disadvantaged.
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2022, 19:22 last edited by
He has the movie rights, I guess.
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2022, 23:48 last edited by
-
wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 04:04 last edited by
Yeah, Federal Prison looms large in his future.
-
wrote on 4 Dec 2022, 02:59 last edited by
-
wrote on 7 Dec 2022, 23:10 last edited by
-
wrote on 7 Dec 2022, 23:12 last edited by
Could a congressional subpoena even result in any punishment? I presume so, but no idea.
-
wrote on 7 Dec 2022, 23:15 last edited by
They really ought to put a cap on how much people and corporations can donate to political parties.
I’d be happy with zero dollars, however that might be unrealistic
-
wrote on 7 Dec 2022, 23:32 last edited by
Could a congressional subpoena even result in any punishment? I presume so, but no idea.
Presumably, a subpoena can lead to a criminal referral by the committee. Then it's up to the DOJ to decide whether to prosecute.
Nice that SBF won't be called, so that, should he refuse to testify, he doesn't have to suffer the indignity of being held in contempt of congress and being jailed just like
Lois LernerEric HolderSteve Bannon.(Insert GIF of Waters blowing a kiss to SBF here: _______________)
-
wrote on 8 Dec 2022, 00:09 last edited by