Ranked choice voting?
-
-
No.
Look at the absolute shit-storm in Alaska.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
I think it is a good idea. From my understanding on how it works, my analysis is that it "forces" a candidate to appeal to the wide audience, not just the fringe sides.
-
@Jolly said in Ranked choice voting?:
Look at the absolute shit-storm in Alaska.
You mean former politician, commentator, author, and reality television personality Sarah Palin not getting elected?
-
@Jolly said in Ranked choice voting?:
No.
Look at the absolute shit-storm in Alaska.
Meh. It would be difficult to make the case that it changed the outcome. Begich voters preferred Pelota to Palin, which they communicated directly.
“Don’t make me repeat myself”
- history
-
I like the idea better for primaries, less so for general elections.
-
@Jolly said in Ranked choice voting?:
No.
Look at the absolute shit-storm in Alaska.
Meh. It would be difficult to make the case that it changed the outcome. Begich voters preferred Pelota to Palin, which they communicated directly.
@jon-nyc said in Ranked choice voting?:
@Jolly said in Ranked choice voting?:
No.
Look at the absolute shit-storm in Alaska.
Meh. It would be difficult to make the case that it changed the outcome. Begich voters preferred Pelota to Palin, which they communicated directly.
Look at the Senate race, lad.
-
@jon-nyc said in Ranked choice voting?:
@Jolly said in Ranked choice voting?:
No.
Look at the absolute shit-storm in Alaska.
Meh. It would be difficult to make the case that it changed the outcome. Begich voters preferred Pelota to Palin, which they communicated directly.
Look at the Senate race, lad.
@Jolly said in Ranked choice voting?:
@jon-nyc said in Ranked choice voting?:
@Jolly said in Ranked choice voting?:
No.
Look at the absolute shit-storm in Alaska.
Meh. It would be difficult to make the case that it changed the outcome. Begich voters preferred Pelota to Palin, which they communicated directly.
Look at the Senate race, lad.
The one in 2010, where Democrats and Republicans alike wrote in enough ballots to get Murkowsky voted in over both the Democratic and Republican candidates? What better evidence could you need that Alaskans consider the candidate over the party and the true preference of the electorate might be someone other than a party favorite.
