With Guns Drawn
-
@Jolly said in With Guns Drawn:
Violence is never the answer.
Bwhahahahahahahaha!
Violence has been the answer in 90% of human history.
-
@Jolly said in With Guns Drawn:
Violence is never the answer.
Wait.
I thought words are violence? That's what I've been reading for the last couple of years.
The guy who was "assaulted" called a 12-year-old a fag, according to reports. Why isn't he locked up, Director Wray?
-
It gets worse...This case has already been to court, according to this article...
https://www.yahoo.com/now/kintersville-man-indicted-assaulting-elderly-221151395.html
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
I see two big problems:
-
This current Federal emphasis on domestic terrorism is ludicrous. The FBI needs to mind its beeswax and concentrate on crime, which has become rampant in many cities.
-
Force levels. Police are not the military. Police do not need overwhelming force for a simple arrest. A warrant and two guys in suits could have taken care of this with ease. You don't need a SWAT team and drawn guns to arrest a guy for shoving someone.
-
-
It gets worse...This case has already been to court, according to this article...
https://www.yahoo.com/now/kintersville-man-indicted-assaulting-elderly-221151395.html
-
-
What a moral panic looks like. People at the levers of power may be calculated with the levers they pull, but the rank and file indoctrinated masses have to be on board with a true moral panic. People like that are an existential threat to our very democracy, just ask your local leftist. Or similarly, Desantis’ shenanigans with the illegals is indicative of sociopathy permeating the Republican Party. Just ask your local leftist. This is what moral panic looks like.
-
I've read in a couple of places a civil suit against Houck was already dismissed. I also cannot find where he was ever charged by local law enforcement for anything.
Anybody have any other information?
-
I've read in a couple of places a civil suit against Houck was already dismissed. I also cannot find where he was ever charged by local law enforcement for anything.
Anybody have any other information?
-
So...If the civil suit was thrown out, and local law enforcement did not arrest him, why (besides political reasons) would the FBI do an assault on this guy's home?
-
So...If the civil suit was thrown out, and local law enforcement did not arrest him, why (besides political reasons) would the FBI do an assault on this guy's home?
@Jolly said in With Guns Drawn:
So...If the civil suit was thrown out, and local law enforcement did not arrest him, why (besides political reasons) would the FBI do an assault on this guy's home?
Different alleged crime?
The civil suit was a tort, not part of any state or federal statute. The assault was alleged and complaint dropped. Local authorities decided that "no reasonable prosecutor" would pursue the case.
The FEDERAL allegation is on the basis of a different law - one that makes it a FEDERAL crime to interfere with access to
abortionmaternal health services. -
@Jolly said in With Guns Drawn:
So...If the civil suit was thrown out, and local law enforcement did not arrest him, why (besides political reasons) would the FBI do an assault on this guy's home?
Different alleged crime?
The civil suit was a tort, not part of any state or federal statute. The assault was alleged and complaint dropped. Local authorities decided that "no reasonable prosecutor" would pursue the case.
The FEDERAL allegation is on the basis of a different law - one that makes it a FEDERAL crime to interfere with access to
abortionmaternal health services.@George-K said in With Guns Drawn:
@Jolly said in With Guns Drawn:
So...If the civil suit was thrown out, and local law enforcement did not arrest him, why (besides political reasons) would the FBI do an assault on this guy's home?
Different alleged crime?
The civil suit was a tort, not part of any state or federal statute. The assault was alleged and complaint dropped. Local authorities decided that "no reasonable prosecutor" would pursue the case.
The FEDERAL allegation is on the basis of a different law - one that makes it a FEDERAL crime to interfere with access to
abortionmaternal health services.And it took them a year to build a case?
In the first place, I wonder if the shoving incident was because of trying to deny a woman access to an abortion or because the escort told Hauck's son his dad was a fag? If that is the FBI's case, that is thin gruel, indeed.
Have the Democrats opened up ppolitical war on Christians?
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
@George-K said in With Guns Drawn:
@Jolly said in With Guns Drawn:
So...If the civil suit was thrown out, and local law enforcement did not arrest him, why (besides political reasons) would the FBI do an assault on this guy's home?
Different alleged crime?
The civil suit was a tort, not part of any state or federal statute. The assault was alleged and complaint dropped. Local authorities decided that "no reasonable prosecutor" would pursue the case.
The FEDERAL allegation is on the basis of a different law - one that makes it a FEDERAL crime to interfere with access to
abortionmaternal health services.And it took them a year to build a case?
In the first place, I wonder if the shoving incident was because of trying to deny a woman access to an abortion or because the escort told Hauck's son his dad was a fag? If that is the FBI's case, that is thin gruel, indeed.
Have the Democrats opened up ppolitical war on Christians?
-
@George-K said in With Guns Drawn:
@Jolly said in With Guns Drawn:
So...If the civil suit was thrown out, and local law enforcement did not arrest him, why (besides political reasons) would the FBI do an assault on this guy's home?
Different alleged crime?
The civil suit was a tort, not part of any state or federal statute. The assault was alleged and complaint dropped. Local authorities decided that "no reasonable prosecutor" would pursue the case.
The FEDERAL allegation is on the basis of a different law - one that makes it a FEDERAL crime to interfere with access to
abortionmaternal health services.And it took them a year to build a case?
In the first place, I wonder if the shoving incident was because of trying to deny a woman access to an abortion or because the escort told Hauck's son his dad was a fag? If that is the FBI's case, that is thin gruel, indeed.
Have the Democrats opened up ppolitical war on Christians?
@Jolly said in With Guns Drawn:
I wonder if the shoving incident was because of trying to deny a woman access to an abortion or because the escort told Hauck's son his dad was a fag?
I commented on that. Certainly, that qualifies as a "Hate Crime," amirite?
-
@Jolly said in With Guns Drawn:
I wonder if the shoving incident was because of trying to deny a woman access to an abortion or because the escort told Hauck's son his dad was a fag?
I commented on that. Certainly, that qualifies as a "Hate Crime," amirite?
@George-K said in With Guns Drawn:
@Jolly said in With Guns Drawn:
I wonder if the shoving incident was because of trying to deny a woman access to an abortion or because the escort told Hauck's son his dad was a fag?
I commented on that. Certainly, that qualifies as a "Hate Crime," amirite?
Only if a Republican sez that.
-
-
The FBI did come out and say they didn't use a SWAT team. Only 20-25 armed agents.
