Just STFU
-
-
@Jolly , whom would you rather have out stumping for people to get vaccinated?
And right now, until you have a new formulation, they'd be spitting in the wind.
There just may be one in the wings….
https://news.ubc.ca/2022/08/18/ubc-researchers-discover-weak-spot-across-major-covid-19-variants/
-
Neat stuff. I've been yelling for more and better treatments for some time.
As for the vaccine, it's always going to be leaky, that part is now self-evident. I think what the The Resident's Administration should do, is trot out some doc the American public could trust (it ain't gonna be Fauxi or that cross-dressing fool) and explain who needs the booster and why.
I wouldn't give it to kids or recommend it to anybody under 30, probably 40. I'd make my pitch at 55+.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion.
-
I don’t particularly distrust Fauci. I’m sure there are some bubbles where he’s thought of as Satan. Maybe Doctor Oz could speak to those folk.
-
From day one the line was it might not prevent you from getting it, but it pretty reliably prevents serious illness. I think it has lived up to what it promised. What's the beef?
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
From day one the line was it might not prevent you from getting it, but it pretty reliably prevents serious illness. I think it has lived up to what it promised. What's the beef?
From day one the line was it might not prevent you from getting it, but it pretty reliably prevents serious illness. I think it has lived up to what it promised. What's the beef?
Meh, I'm going to have to disagree with that. The big selling point regarding the mandates was preventing spread...
The anti-vax crowd was touting natural immunity/prior infection as a counter, and that ended up being as ineffective as the vaccines when it came to spread.
The Brad
-
Neat stuff. I've been yelling for more and better treatments for some time.
As for the vaccine, it's always going to be leaky, that part is now self-evident. I think what the The Resident's Administration should do, is trot out some doc the American public could trust (it ain't gonna be Fauxi or that cross-dressing fool) and explain who needs the booster and why.
I wouldn't give it to kids or recommend it to anybody under 30, probably 40. I'd make my pitch at 55+.
I wouldn't give it to kids or recommend it to anybody under 30, probably 40. I'd make my pitch at 55+.
So I take it implanting microchips via C19 vaccine in 55 and older is okay with you. Or do you have a better way to introduce the chips into younger folks?
Elbows up!
-
I took the vaccine and all the boosters because I thought it made it less likely that I’d get proper sick.
-
I took the vaccine and all the boosters because I thought it made it less likely that I’d get proper sick.
As did I. How no one in our house came down with it is beyond me. Likewise, I can’t imagine that all three of us caught it but we’re asymptomatic either. Don’t believe it happens that way.
-
I wouldn't give it to kids or recommend it to anybody under 30, probably 40. I'd make my pitch at 55+.
So I take it implanting microchips via C19 vaccine in 55 and older is okay with you. Or do you have a better way to introduce the chips into younger folks?
I wouldn't give it to kids or recommend it to anybody under 30, probably 40. I'd make my pitch at 55+.
So I take it implanting microchips via C19 vaccine in 55 and older is okay with you. Or do you have a better way to introduce the chips into younger folks?
They are controlled through their cellphones.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion.
-
From day one the line was it might not prevent you from getting it, but it pretty reliably prevents serious illness. I think it has lived up to what it promised. What's the beef?
Meh, I'm going to have to disagree with that. The big selling point regarding the mandates was preventing spread...
The anti-vax crowd was touting natural immunity/prior infection as a counter, and that ended up being as ineffective as the vaccines when it came to spread.
@LuFins-Dad said in Just STFU:
From day one the line was it might not prevent you from getting it, but it pretty reliably prevents serious illness. I think it has lived up to what it promised. What's the beef?
Meh, I'm going to have to disagree with that. The big selling point regarding the mandates was preventing spread...
The anti-vax crowd was touting natural immunity/prior infection as a counter, and that ended up being as ineffective as the vaccines when it came to spread.
The vaccine does reduce spread. This USA “fact check” article rounds up many studies that quantify how much vaccine prevents infections and prevents spread.
E.g., “Bansal pointed to data from the United Kingdom, which shows the COVID-19 vaccines reduce the chances of getting infected by 50%-75%. A preprint study, also conducted in the U.K., found that two doses of the Pfizer vaccine are 80% effective against preventing all infections with the delta coronavirus variant.”
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Just STFU:
From day one the line was it might not prevent you from getting it, but it pretty reliably prevents serious illness. I think it has lived up to what it promised. What's the beef?
Meh, I'm going to have to disagree with that. The big selling point regarding the mandates was preventing spread...
The anti-vax crowd was touting natural immunity/prior infection as a counter, and that ended up being as ineffective as the vaccines when it came to spread.
The vaccine does reduce spread. This USA “fact check” article rounds up many studies that quantify how much vaccine prevents infections and prevents spread.
E.g., “Bansal pointed to data from the United Kingdom, which shows the COVID-19 vaccines reduce the chances of getting infected by 50%-75%. A preprint study, also conducted in the U.K., found that two doses of the Pfizer vaccine are 80% effective against preventing all infections with the delta coronavirus variant.”
@LuFins-Dad said in Just STFU:
From day one the line was it might not prevent you from getting it, but it pretty reliably prevents serious illness. I think it has lived up to what it promised. What's the beef?
Meh, I'm going to have to disagree with that. The big selling point regarding the mandates was preventing spread...
The anti-vax crowd was touting natural immunity/prior infection as a counter, and that ended up being as ineffective as the vaccines when it came to spread.
The vaccine does reduce spread. This USA “fact check” article rounds up many studies that quantify how much vaccine prevents infections and prevents spread.
E.g., “Bansal pointed to data from the United Kingdom, which shows the COVID-19 vaccines reduce the chances of getting infected by 50%-75%. A preprint study, also conducted in the U.K., found that two doses of the Pfizer vaccine are 80% effective against preventing all infections with the delta coronavirus variant.”
I'm not too sure about that. I think the vast majority of people have now had clinical or sub-clinical cases of COVID.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion.
-
I wouldn't give it to kids or recommend it to anybody under 30, probably 40. I'd make my pitch at 55+.
So I take it implanting microchips via C19 vaccine in 55 and older is okay with you. Or do you have a better way to introduce the chips into younger folks?
They are controlled through their cellphones.
I wouldn't give it to kids or recommend it to anybody under 30, probably 40. I'd make my pitch at 55+.
So I take it implanting microchips via C19 vaccine in 55 and older is okay with you. Or do you have a better way to introduce the chips into younger folks?
They are controlled through their cellphones.
I am such a Luddite.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Just STFU:
From day one the line was it might not prevent you from getting it, but it pretty reliably prevents serious illness. I think it has lived up to what it promised. What's the beef?
Meh, I'm going to have to disagree with that. The big selling point regarding the mandates was preventing spread...
The anti-vax crowd was touting natural immunity/prior infection as a counter, and that ended up being as ineffective as the vaccines when it came to spread.
The vaccine does reduce spread. This USA “fact check” article rounds up many studies that quantify how much vaccine prevents infections and prevents spread.
E.g., “Bansal pointed to data from the United Kingdom, which shows the COVID-19 vaccines reduce the chances of getting infected by 50%-75%. A preprint study, also conducted in the U.K., found that two doses of the Pfizer vaccine are 80% effective against preventing all infections with the delta coronavirus variant.”
I'm not too sure about that. I think the vast majority of people have now had clinical or sub-clinical cases of COVID.
I still have no idea whether I’ve had it. My daughter had it, but nobody else got more than mild lethargy, and I get that a lot
-
From day one the line was it might not prevent you from getting it, but it pretty reliably prevents serious illness. I think it has lived up to what it promised. What's the beef?
From day one the line was it might not prevent you from getting it, but it pretty reliably prevents serious illness. I think it has lived up to what it promised. What's the beef?
I agree. I never really heard that the vaccine was going to stop you from getting COVID (maybe that was said in the first few hours, but certainly not over the long term.)
