Mar-a-Lago raided
-
Here, in reverse, Democrats broke into the home of the 45th President of the United States."
The FBI director is a Trump appointee.
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 15:00 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Here, in reverse, Democrats broke into the home of the 45th President of the United States."
The FBI director is a Trump appointee.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 15:01 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
I’m totally withholding judgment and I’m totally a conservative. It’s too bad the news cycle will swallow this story whole, should there be no there there, and the I Told You Sos will fall on deaf ears. Will there be not a single liberal who cares about the politicized weaponization of the FBI and Justice? Lol just kidding, the question does not bear asking, as the answer is too obvious.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 15:10 last edited by
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 15:16 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Yes Matt, there is one.
Two, counting me.
-
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
I’m totally withholding judgment and I’m totally a conservative. It’s too bad the news cycle will swallow this story whole, should there be no there there, and the I Told You Sos will fall on deaf ears. Will there be not a single liberal who cares about the politicized weaponization of the FBI and Justice? Lol just kidding, the question does not bear asking, as the answer is too obvious.
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 15:17 last edited by Doctor Phibes 8 Sept 2022, 15:17@Horace said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Will there be not a single liberal who cares about the politicized weaponization of the FBI and Justice? Lol just kidding, the question does not bear asking, as the answer is too obvious.
I will. If nothing substantial comes from this, then the decision makers at the FBI and anybody who else who was involved in the decision should be held to account.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 15:18 last edited by
Don't hold your breath.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 15:26 last edited by Doctor Phibes 8 Sept 2022, 15:27
@Mik said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Don't hold your breath.
Seems to me there's a long history of the FBI being a law unto themselves, going back to the 1920's, so breath-holding might be unwise.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 15:34 last edited by Catseye3 8 Sept 2022, 15:36
(Nodding) Because by the time that happens there will be such a tangled schreifest that nobody will learn anything.
To elaborate on LuFin's Karnak predictions:
Of the 45% of the people who defend Trump and attack Justice, 90% will not change their minds, no, not ever, no matter what, and of the 45% who attack Trump and defend Justice, 90% will not change their minds, no, not ever, no matter what. Because both groups will have unassailable support from the entities they crafted their opinions from in the first place and therefore can not be wrong.
And the truth, so-called, will never be determined, much less accepted.
I've toyed with the notion of a world without the Internet because knowledge overdose morphs into bullshit and hurts everybody. Maybe go back to radio and newspapers, I said.
But I'm starting to think maybe we should go back even further, to getting our news from runners with sticks.
-
@Mik said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Don't hold your breath.
Seems to me there's a long history of the FBI being a law unto themselves, going back to the 1920's, so breath-holding might be unwise.
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 15:43 last edited by Renauda 8 Sept 2022, 20:23@Doctor-Phibes said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
@Mik said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Don't hold your breath.
Seems to me there's a long history of the FBI being a law unto themselves, going back to the 1920's, so breath-holding might be unwise.
I have sometimes mused on the notion of Hoover, Heydrich and Beria sharing notes and anecdotes while they all bake together in the discomforts of hell.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 16:48 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Thank you for the evidence in support of Jolly’s Banana Republic concerns.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 19:07 last edited by
-
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Here, in reverse, Democrats broke into the home of the 45th President of the United States."
The FBI director is a Trump appointee.
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 19:21 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Here, in reverse, Democrats broke into the home of the 45th President of the United States."
The FBI director is a Trump appointee.
What a maroon.
Does not this idiot understand anything about the current fight within the GOP?
-
@Mik said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Don't hold your breath.
Seems to me there's a long history of the FBI being a law unto themselves, going back to the 1920's, so breath-holding might be unwise.
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 19:23 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
@Mik said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Don't hold your breath.
Seems to me there's a long history of the FBI being a law unto themselves, going back to the 1920's, so breath-holding might be unwise.
It's gotten worse. Or maybe not. Maybe it's just that we know more than we used to.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 19:26 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
Put up or shut up, bitch.
If I heard correctly, the FBI did not inventory anything on-site.
I guess that gives them a better opportunity to forge the documents they need.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 19:55 last edited by
Of course to his cult members his innocence is unfalsifiable.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 20:00 last edited by
Are you telling me no false documents have ever been used by the FBI against Donald Trump?
-
@Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
He sent them the 15 boxes they requested.
If he did, he did. What's your source?
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 20:02 last edited by@Catseye3 said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
@Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
He sent them the 15 boxes they requested.
If he did, he did. What's your source?
February. Taken back by the National Archives.
You want the exact date, you'll have to look it up.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 20:16 last edited by
Lock him up! Just make sure you lock her up at the same time. Hunter as well, then have a full investigation into the current administrator.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 20:27 last edited by
They had better find something. If not, they have strongly buttressed his chances in 24.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2022, 20:31 last edited by
@Mik said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
They had better find something. If not, they have strongly buttressed his chances in 24.
Third possibility: they absolutely find something that justifies the search. But it's so boring that it plays into Trump's hands anyway.