"Stand down. Do not pursue."
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
The Chicago Police Department introduced a new vehicle pursuit policy in August 2020. The order provides officers with 11 pages of instructions that they must consider when deciding if a vehicle should be pursued. It specifically states that CPD will not discipline any member for ending a motor vehicle pursuit.
What does that have to do with why the boss terminated the chase?
@Catseye3 said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
@Aqua-Letifer said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
The Chicago Police Department introduced a new vehicle pursuit policy in August 2020. The order provides officers with 11 pages of instructions that they must consider when deciding if a vehicle should be pursued. It specifically states that CPD will not discipline any member for ending a motor vehicle pursuit.
What does that have to do with why the boss terminated the chase?
Read the policy. The way it's written, any reason at all to terminate a chase can be justified. And the new policy states upfront that, without caveats, no one will be reprimanded for terminating a chase.
-
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
The Chicago Police Department introduced a new vehicle pursuit policy in August 2020. The order provides officers with 11 pages of instructions that they must consider when deciding if a vehicle should be pursued. It specifically states that CPD will not discipline any member for ending a motor vehicle pursuit.
What does that have to do with why the boss terminated the chase?
@Catseye3 said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
@Aqua-Letifer said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
The Chicago Police Department introduced a new vehicle pursuit policy in August 2020. The order provides officers with 11 pages of instructions that they must consider when deciding if a vehicle should be pursued. It specifically states that CPD will not discipline any member for ending a motor vehicle pursuit.
What does that have to do with why the boss terminated the chase?
What are the chances that the three armed murderers on the run surrender?
What are the chances that at least one officer gets shot?
What are the chances that any or all of the murderers get shot?
If the murderers do get shot and even if the shooting is perfectly justifiable, what are the chances that these police officers wind up sacrificing their careers and having their lives ruined?
-
@Catseye3 said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
@Aqua-Letifer said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
The Chicago Police Department introduced a new vehicle pursuit policy in August 2020. The order provides officers with 11 pages of instructions that they must consider when deciding if a vehicle should be pursued. It specifically states that CPD will not discipline any member for ending a motor vehicle pursuit.
What does that have to do with why the boss terminated the chase?
What are the chances that the three armed murderers on the run surrender?
What are the chances that at least one officer gets shot?
What are the chances that any or all of the murderers get shot?
If the murderers do get shot and even if the shooting is perfectly justifiable, what are the chances that these police officers wind up sacrificing their careers and having their lives ruined?
@LuFins-Dad said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
What are the chances that the three armed murderers on the run surrender?
What are the chances that at least one officer gets shot?
What are the chances that any or all of the murderers get shot?
If the murderers do get shot and even if the shooting is perfectly justifiable, what are the chances that these police officers wind up sacrificing their careers and having their lives ruined?And you know this was the brass' reasoning? Were you there?
-
@LuFins-Dad said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
What are the chances that the three armed murderers on the run surrender?
What are the chances that at least one officer gets shot?
What are the chances that any or all of the murderers get shot?
If the murderers do get shot and even if the shooting is perfectly justifiable, what are the chances that these police officers wind up sacrificing their careers and having their lives ruined?And you know this was the brass' reasoning? Were you there?
@Catseye3 said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
@LuFins-Dad said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
What are the chances that the three armed murderers on the run surrender?
What are the chances that at least one officer gets shot?
What are the chances that any or all of the murderers get shot?
If the murderers do get shot and even if the shooting is perfectly justifiable, what are the chances that these police officers wind up sacrificing their careers and having their lives ruined?And you know this was the brass' reasoning? Were you there?
Nope. Wasn't there when the cat ate the canary, either, but the reason is still pretty obvious.
-
@Catseye3 said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
@LuFins-Dad said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
What are the chances that the three armed murderers on the run surrender?
What are the chances that at least one officer gets shot?
What are the chances that any or all of the murderers get shot?
If the murderers do get shot and even if the shooting is perfectly justifiable, what are the chances that these police officers wind up sacrificing their careers and having their lives ruined?And you know this was the brass' reasoning? Were you there?
Nope. Wasn't there when the cat ate the canary, either, but the reason is still pretty obvious.
@LuFins-Dad said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
Wasn't there when the cat ate the canary, either, but the reason is still pretty obvious.
My original point was to why the reason was not included in the story. Yes, I was curious about why the termination, but that was secondary to the fact that the reporter didn't see fit to include the reason for it. It seemed pretty glaring as an omission.
Maybe it was "obvious" to you, but it's a poor reporter who leaves some part of the coverage to the assumption of the reader.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
Wasn't there when the cat ate the canary, either, but the reason is still pretty obvious.
My original point was to why the reason was not included in the story. Yes, I was curious about why the termination, but that was secondary to the fact that the reporter didn't see fit to include the reason for it. It seemed pretty glaring as an omission.
Maybe it was "obvious" to you, but it's a poor reporter who leaves some part of the coverage to the assumption of the reader.
@Catseye3 said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
@LuFins-Dad said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
Wasn't there when the cat ate the canary, either, but the reason is still pretty obvious.
My original point was to why the reason was not included in the story. Yes, I was curious about why the termination, but that was secondary to the fact that the reporter didn't see fit to include the reason for it. It seemed pretty glaring as an omission.
Maybe it was "obvious" to you, but it's a poor reporter who leaves some part of the coverage to the assumption of the reader.
Have you ever called up police "brass" as you put it to get clarification on a story you're writing about them? Would you like to know how those conversations go?
-
@Catseye3 said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
@LuFins-Dad said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
Wasn't there when the cat ate the canary, either, but the reason is still pretty obvious.
My original point was to why the reason was not included in the story. Yes, I was curious about why the termination, but that was secondary to the fact that the reporter didn't see fit to include the reason for it. It seemed pretty glaring as an omission.
Maybe it was "obvious" to you, but it's a poor reporter who leaves some part of the coverage to the assumption of the reader.
Have you ever called up police "brass" as you put it to get clarification on a story you're writing about them? Would you like to know how those conversations go?
@Aqua-Letifer Jesus, forget it. I asked a simple question. Didn't mean to get everybody's panties in a wad.
-
@Aqua-Letifer Jesus, forget it. I asked a simple question. Didn't mean to get everybody's panties in a wad.
@Catseye3 said in "Stand down. Do not pursue.":
@Aqua-Letifer Jesus, forget it. I asked a simple question. Didn't mean to get everybody's panties in a wad.
If Aqua is wearing panties, then you are a trans hater for disagreeing with him.
-
I’m sorry, but I thought you were really looking for an answer to your question, not criticizing the way the report was written. It’s one of the problems with the medium, “tone of voice” doesn’t translate…
-
I’m sorry, but I thought you were really looking for an answer to your question, not criticizing the way the report was written. It’s one of the problems with the medium, “tone of voice” doesn’t translate…
@LuFins-Dad No prob.
-
Correlation is not causation, but do ya think that the plummeting arrest rate might have something to do as to why crime is rising?
