Roe & Casey overturned.
-
wrote on 11 Jul 2022, 22:31 last edited by
Or ze, bigot.
-
@Jolly said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
The. Most. Thread. Drift. Ever.
Remember many years ago we would joke about how so many threads would devolve into evolution or abortion threads?
Now the abortion threads devolve into HOV gaming.
We’re getting soft.
wrote on 11 Jul 2022, 22:45 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
@Jolly said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
The. Most. Thread. Drift. Ever.
Remember many years ago we would joke about how so many threads would devolve into evolution or abortion threads?
Now the abortion threads devolve into HOV gaming.
We’re getting soft.
If you wish to talk about your sexual problems, start a new thread.
-
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 01:22 last edited by
-
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 02:13 last edited by
@George-K said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
What? Someone lied?
Huh, who woulda thunk it? @Axtremus ? Would you have thunk it?
-
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 02:21 last edited by
Another thing that doesn’t make sense? How are they setting the gestation at exactly 6 weeks and 3 days? With Lu and Fin we were always told “6-8 weeks”, “18-20”, etc…
-
Another thing that doesn’t make sense? How are they setting the gestation at exactly 6 weeks and 3 days? With Lu and Fin we were always told “6-8 weeks”, “18-20”, etc…
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 02:46 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
Another thing that doesn’t make sense? How are they setting the gestation at exactly 6 weeks and 3 days? With Lu and Fin we were always told “6-8 weeks”, “18-20”, etc…
You can't. Not that precise.
-
Another thing that doesn’t make sense? How are they setting the gestation at exactly 6 weeks and 3 days? With Lu and Fin we were always told “6-8 weeks”, “18-20”, etc…
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 11:44 last edited by 89th 7 Dec 2022, 11:44@LuFins-Dad said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
Another thing that doesn’t make sense? How are they setting the gestation at exactly 6 weeks and 3 days? With Lu and Fin we were always told “6-8 weeks”, “18-20”, etc…
In my experience they can be pretty accurate. My wife is 12 weeks preggo now. When we went in for the first appointment around 6 weeks and they were able to estimate it was "6 weeks 3 days" during the ultrasound. Yes, we saw the heartbeat, too. Cool stuff. Anyway, we went back at 10 weeks to verify growth was normal and they verified the gestational age estimate was only a day off (so it was really 6 weeks 2 days at that first appointment) but they kept the same due date of Jan 22 next year.
-
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 12:10 last edited by
They approximate. Yes, the US is much better today and certain things appear at certain times. Quant HCG levels can help a bit very early on, too.
But dead letter perfect to the day? No.
-
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 12:14 last edited by
A note about due dates...Babies are born when they want to be born. And sometimes, it seems like they don't want out.
Friend's daughter was two weeks past due date, and they sectioned her this week. Baby weighed 9lbs, 11 ounces.
-
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 12:22 last edited by
I was 9lbs 13oz.
On time. Wearing a suit.
-
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 12:27 last edited by
With tie?
-
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 13:35 last edited by
I was three weeks premature. Probably the only time in my life I was raring to go outside and do stuff.
-
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 14:55 last edited by
-
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 15:47 last edited by
@Mik said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
This is going to muddy the waters.
I think most states, even restrictive ones, have language that allows for abortion if needed to save the life of a mother, but often the language is vague so I would think doctors would be hesitant so as not to face charges.
So, this federal "reminder" (?) I think could help clarify that a bit, which is good. Although....I would imagine it's often hard to quantify the emergency/risk to a mother regarding an abortion, so maybe the waters remain muddy.
-
@Mik said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
This is going to muddy the waters.
I think most states, even restrictive ones, have language that allows for abortion if needed to save the life of a mother, but often the language is vague so I would think doctors would be hesitant so as not to face charges.
So, this federal "reminder" (?) I think could help clarify that a bit, which is good. Although....I would imagine it's often hard to quantify the emergency/risk to a mother regarding an abortion, so maybe the waters remain muddy.
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 16:21 last edited by jon-nyc 7 Dec 2022, 16:22@89th said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
Although....I would imagine it's often hard to quantify the emergency/risk to a mother regarding an abortion, so maybe the waters remain muddy.
I think we can count on red state Attorneys General not to second guess a doctor’s emergency decision after the fact, just to have a high profile prosecution that gets him in the national news and generates political support among the GOP base.
Right?
Right?
-
@89th said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
Although....I would imagine it's often hard to quantify the emergency/risk to a mother regarding an abortion, so maybe the waters remain muddy.
I think we can count on red state Attorneys General not to second guess a doctor’s emergency decision after the fact, just to have a high profile prosecution that gets him in the national news and generates political support among the GOP base.
Right?
Right?
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 16:23 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
@89th said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
Although....I would imagine it's often hard to quantify the emergency/risk to a mother regarding an abortion, so maybe the waters remain muddy.
I think we can count on red state Attorneys General not to second guess a doctor’s emergency decision after the fact, just to have a high profile prosecution that gets him in the national news and generates political support among the GOP base.
Right?
Right?
Unless the doc is an activist.
-
@jon-nyc said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
@89th said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
Although....I would imagine it's often hard to quantify the emergency/risk to a mother regarding an abortion, so maybe the waters remain muddy.
I think we can count on red state Attorneys General not to second guess a doctor’s emergency decision after the fact, just to have a high profile prosecution that gets him in the national news and generates political support among the GOP base.
Right?
Right?
Unless the doc is an activist.
-
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 16:25 last edited by
I think most AG's won't go looking for trouble in the medical world, unless shoved into it.
-
wrote on 12 Jul 2022, 17:21 last edited by