Roe & Casey overturned.
-
@George-K said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
Posted by a "friend" on FB:
I was that close to saying "Well, you didn't object in 1972, did you?"
Were they a biologist?
Beyond that, do we now need man laws made by men for men? Women laws made by women for women? How about white laws and black laws?
wrote on 27 Jun 2022, 21:02 last edited by -
wrote on 27 Jun 2022, 21:09 last edited by
@George-K said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
@LuFins-Dad said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
Were they a biologist?
A nurse...
If the abortion doc's a male, their argument kinda crumbles.
-
wrote on 27 Jun 2022, 22:00 last edited by Copper
If the baby killed is male, their argument kinda crumbles.
-
Posted by a "friend" on FB:
I was that close to saying "Well, you didn't object in 1972, did you?"
wrote on 28 Jun 2022, 00:15 last edited by LuFins Dad@George-K said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
Posted by a "friend" on FB:
I was that close to saying "Well, you didn't object in 1972, did you?"
Did the nurse object last year when men passed laws that she had to take a vaccine into her body to keep her job?
Does she make the same protest regarding prostitution laws? It’s her body… Drugs? Seatbelts?
Of course, there’s also the whole point that women are lawmakers too. My bet is she also wishes that men passed laws about her body in 2009…
-
wrote on 28 Jun 2022, 00:30 last edited by Mik
The responses to the decision have been fraught with sloppy thinking and Ill considered “points”.
-
wrote on 28 Jun 2022, 01:14 last edited by
It is simple.
It's not about a woman's body, it is about murder.
This is one of the top 10 laws of all time.
-
wrote on 28 Jun 2022, 01:44 last edited by
Profile of the most likely abortion patient:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/12/14/upshot/who-gets-abortions-in-america.html
THE TYPICAL PATIENT ...
Is Already a Mother.
Is in Her Late 20s.
Attended Some College.
Has a Low Income.
Is Unmarried.
Is in Her First 6 Weeks of Pregnancy.
Is Having Her First Abortion.
Lives in a Blue State. -
wrote on 28 Jun 2022, 02:59 last edited by jon-nyc
Larry (and often Jolly) often suffer from is/ought confusion. Larry assumes that how he thinks the universe should be configured is how the universe is configured.
The right to bear arms shall not be infringed.
Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech.
And yet…. Time place and manner restrictions are allowed in each case.
-
wrote on 28 Jun 2022, 04:03 last edited by Jolly
And the problem with some people is that they can stare at their navel long enough to confuse the rule and the exceptions.
Seriously, the Constitution works as well as it does, because it fairly simple and it errs on the side of federal government restriction.
We'd be better off and more free, if we just quit ceding power to the feds.
-
wrote on 29 Jun 2022, 03:13 last edited by Jolly
Satan weighs in...
Link to video -
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 13:26 last edited by
-
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 15:03 last edited by
-
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 16:27 last edited by
-
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 17:49 last edited by
@LuFins-Dad said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
LOLGTFO…
Turley commented that that will be problematic, since SCOTUS just ruled that abortion is a matter for the states to decide.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
LOLGTFO…
Turley commented that that will be problematic, since SCOTUS just ruled that abortion is a matter for the states to decide.
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 18:05 last edited by@George-K said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
@LuFins-Dad said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
LOLGTFO…
Turley commented that that will be problematic, since SCOTUS just ruled that abortion is a matter for the states to decide.
They didn’t rule out federal legislation but Biden’s idea is stupid anyway.
-
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 02:58 last edited by
Intermission:
This was posted on LinkedIn. Incredible.
The comments section actually exceeds what you expect.
-
Intermission:
This was posted on LinkedIn. Incredible.
The comments section actually exceeds what you expect.
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 03:32 last edited by jon-nyc 7 Jan 2022, 03:33Not obviously true.
Perhaps the only reason you’re here is because your mom did decide to abort your older sibling.
Lots of people abort a pregnancy when young and go on to have kids when they’re older. In many cases they wouldn’t have the later kid(s) if they had had the earlier one(s).
-
Not obviously true.
Perhaps the only reason you’re here is because your mom did decide to abort your older sibling.
Lots of people abort a pregnancy when young and go on to have kids when they’re older. In many cases they wouldn’t have the later kid(s) if they had had the earlier one(s).
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 03:39 last edited by Aqua Letifer 7 Jan 2022, 03:40@jon-nyc said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
Not obviously true.
Bro what the hell are you doing even entertaining this.
This is like 5 Duning-Kruger incompetency curves, all in constructive interference with one another, creating the mythical idiocy superwave. Rare, fleeting, almost too powerful to believe.Perhaps the only reason you’re here is because your mom did decide to abort your older sibling.
Nah, very unlikely. Not likely due to age, and anyway, by accounts, it didn't happen.
Lots of people abort a pregnancy when young and go on to have kids when they’re older. In many cases they wouldn’t have the later kid(s) if they had had the earlier one(s).
True.
Also common for adoptees to have younger half-siblings they never learn about.
-
@jon-nyc said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
Not obviously true.
Bro what the hell are you doing even entertaining this.
This is like 5 Duning-Kruger incompetency curves, all in constructive interference with one another, creating the mythical idiocy superwave. Rare, fleeting, almost too powerful to believe.Perhaps the only reason you’re here is because your mom did decide to abort your older sibling.
Nah, very unlikely. Not likely due to age, and anyway, by accounts, it didn't happen.
Lots of people abort a pregnancy when young and go on to have kids when they’re older. In many cases they wouldn’t have the later kid(s) if they had had the earlier one(s).
True.
Also common for adoptees to have younger half-siblings they never learn about.
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 03:46 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
@jon-nyc said in Roe & Casey overturned.:
Not obviously true.
Bro what the hell are you doing even entertaining this.
This is like 5 Duning-Kruger incompetency curves, all in constructive interference with one another, creating the mythical idiocy superwave. Rare, fleeting, almost too powerful to believe.Perhaps the only reason you’re here is because your mom did decide to abort your older sibling.
Nah, very unlikely. Not likely due to age, and anyway, by accounts, it didn't happen.
Lots of people abort a pregnancy when young and go on to have kids when they’re older. In many cases they wouldn’t have the later kid(s) if they had had the earlier one(s).
True.
Also common for adoptees to have younger half-siblings they never learn about.
I didn’t mean literally you. I meant simply to point out that aborting X pregnancies doesn’t result in X fewer people on net.
"You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
-Cormac McCarthy -
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 12:06 last edited by
@jon-nyc I read an article a few days ago that indicates a surprising number of abortions occur after child 1 was born…
