Today's w00t! for Larry!
-
-
Over here, it's one of the two canonical choices for medical personell (the other one being Crocs).
If you have to stand all day and don't mind the optics it's a very good choice.
@Klaus said in Today's w00t! for Larry!:
Over here, it's one of the two canonical choices for medical personell (the other one being Crocs).
If you have to stand all day and don't mind the optics it's a very good choice.
When looking at shoes for medical personnel, one has to consider the possibility that your footwear will get, um, wet. Even wearing shoe covers in the OR, having a pair of shoes that are washable, or even better gas-sterilizable (not autoclave, they'll melt).
I wore crock for about 2 years. I found them uncomfortable.
This is what I wore all those other years:
I was at a conference in my early days and this company selling them had a booth displaying their products.
I told the attractive young sales lady that one of my favorite features was the "tits" on the insole of the shoes.
She smiled at me, "Doctor, they're not 'tits.' They're 'pleasure ridges.'"
-
@Klaus said in Today's w00t! for Larry!:
Over here, it's one of the two canonical choices for medical personell (the other one being Crocs).
If you have to stand all day and don't mind the optics it's a very good choice.
When looking at shoes for medical personnel, one has to consider the possibility that your footwear will get, um, wet. Even wearing shoe covers in the OR, having a pair of shoes that are washable, or even better gas-sterilizable (not autoclave, they'll melt).
I wore crock for about 2 years. I found them uncomfortable.
This is what I wore all those other years:
I was at a conference in my early days and this company selling them had a booth displaying their products.
I told the attractive young sales lady that one of my favorite features was the "tits" on the insole of the shoes.
She smiled at me, "Doctor, they're not 'tits.' They're 'pleasure ridges.'"
@George-K said in Today's w00t! for Larry!:
When looking at shoes for medical personnel, one has to consider the possibility that your footwear will get, um, wet.
Wouldn't that only apply to a rather small subset of medical personell? For instance, consider dental assistants, or radiological technologists, or ... . A lot of standing and running all day, but "wet stuff" doesn't really apply.
-
@George-K said in Today's w00t! for Larry!:
When looking at shoes for medical personnel, one has to consider the possibility that your footwear will get, um, wet.
Wouldn't that only apply to a rather small subset of medical personell? For instance, consider dental assistants, or radiological technologists, or ... . A lot of standing and running all day, but "wet stuff" doesn't really apply.
@Klaus said in Today's w00t! for Larry!:
@George-K said in Today's w00t! for Larry!:
When looking at shoes for medical personnel, one has to consider the possibility that your footwear will get, um, wet.
Wouldn't that only apply to a rather small subset of medical personell? For instance, consider dental assistants, or radiological technologists, or ... . A lot of standing and running all day, but "wet stuff" doesn't really apply.
Of course. I was in that small subset.
