This is CNET
-
Indeed. I noticed that.
So, why should anyone believe ANYTHING CNET says?
"It's dangerous!"
"It's wonderful!"
PFFT...
-
Indeed. I noticed that.
So, why should anyone believe ANYTHING CNET says?
"It's dangerous!"
"It's wonderful!"
PFFT...
@George-K said in This is CNET:
Indeed. I noticed that.
So, why should anyone believe ANYTHING CNET says?
"It's dangerous!"
"It's wonderful!"
PFFT...
This is what happens when you lay your editors and proofreaders off.
-
@George-K said in This is CNET:
Indeed. I noticed that.
So, why should anyone believe ANYTHING CNET says?
"It's dangerous!"
"It's wonderful!"
PFFT...
This is what happens when you lay your editors and proofreaders off.
I’d never go to CNET for anything. It’s one of those general purpose sites that is always going to be inferior to the specialist places
-
I’d never go to CNET for anything. It’s one of those general purpose sites that is always going to be inferior to the specialist places
@Doctor-Phibes said in This is CNET:
I’d never go to CNET for anything. It’s one of those general purpose sites that is always going to be inferior to the specialist places
Yup. I used to rely on them for reviews of things like printers. Now, it's a wasteland of crap.
-
@George-K said in This is CNET:
Indeed. I noticed that.
So, why should anyone believe ANYTHING CNET says?
"It's dangerous!"
"It's wonderful!"
PFFT...
Like a publication printing two op-ed pieces that emphasize different aspects of some general topic, I don’t see why a product review site cannot publish two different pieces that emphasize different aspects of the style of product. Heck, Siskel and Ebert disagreed with each other from to time on the same movies in the same show, yet you don’t question why anyone should believe anything Siskel and Ebert had to say on their show.
Product review pieces are basically opinion pieces. Just get over it.
Besides, “isn’t retro,” “safety risk,” “weird,” “kinda wonderful” aren’t mutually exclusive or diametrically opposed.
-
@George-K said in This is CNET:
Indeed. I noticed that.
So, why should anyone believe ANYTHING CNET says?
"It's dangerous!"
"It's wonderful!"
PFFT...
Like a publication printing two op-ed pieces that emphasize different aspects of some general topic, I don’t see why a product review site cannot publish two different pieces that emphasize different aspects of the style of product. Heck, Siskel and Ebert disagreed with each other from to time on the same movies in the same show, yet you don’t question why anyone should believe anything Siskel and Ebert had to say on their show.
Product review pieces are basically opinion pieces. Just get over it.
Besides, “isn’t retro,” “safety risk,” “weird,” “kinda wonderful” aren’t mutually exclusive or diametrically opposed.
@Axtremus said in This is CNET:
Product review pieces are basically opinion pieces.
How many have you written, Ax?
-
@Axtremus said in This is CNET:
Product review pieces are basically opinion pieces.
How many have you written, Ax?
@Aqua-Letifer said in This is CNET:
@Axtremus said in This is CNET:
Product review pieces are basically opinion pieces.
How many have you written, Ax?
Haven’t keep count, but there is a bunch of them here: https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/10479/original-movies-not-sequel-not-reboot-not-spin-off
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in This is CNET:
@Axtremus said in This is CNET:
Product review pieces are basically opinion pieces.
How many have you written, Ax?
Haven’t keep count, but there is a bunch of them here: https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/10479/original-movies-not-sequel-not-reboot-not-spin-off
@Axtremus said in This is CNET:
@Aqua-Letifer said in This is CNET:
@Axtremus said in This is CNET:
Product review pieces are basically opinion pieces.
How many have you written, Ax?
Haven’t keep count, but there is a bunch of them here: https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/10479/original-movies-not-sequel-not-reboot-not-spin-off
I was looking for evidence that you have no idea what you're talking about and you more than delivered! Great job, Ax, thank you!
-
@Axtremus said in This is CNET:
@Aqua-Letifer said in This is CNET:
@Axtremus said in This is CNET:
Product review pieces are basically opinion pieces.
How many have you written, Ax?
Haven’t keep count, but there is a bunch of them here: https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/10479/original-movies-not-sequel-not-reboot-not-spin-off
I was looking for evidence that you have no idea what you're talking about and you more than delivered! Great job, Ax, thank you!
-
I wrote a scathing review of an air fryer which is skyrocketing up the "helpful" charts on the product's page on Amazon. Instant is all but going bankrupt over it. No big deal.
