Inexcusable
-
wrote on 9 Jun 2022, 01:03 last edited by
-
wrote on 9 Jun 2022, 01:41 last edited by
So, this is the mob justice of the left, going forward. Make republican appointed supreme court justices' lives as unhappy as possible, within the law. That's probably pretty unhappy. Thanks, righteous douche bags. We'll wait for your outrage and law changes if/when it ever happens to liberal judges.
-
wrote on 9 Jun 2022, 13:35 last edited by
Bill that would increase security for families of Supreme Court justices is stalled in House.
A bipartisan Senate-passed bill that would expand security protection to the immediate family members of Supreme Court justices has stalled in the House, raising questions from senators on why it hasn't passed in the wake of an arrest outside the home of a Supreme Court justice.
The questions come hours after an armed man was arrested near Brett Kavanaugh's Maryland home after making threats against the Supreme Court justice, according to a court spokesperson.
The House hasn't taken up the bill, which passed the Senate by unanimous consent in May.
The legislation must be passed by the House before going to President Joe Biden's desk for his signature.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell reacted angrily to the report about Kavanaugh's home on the Senate floor Wednesday.
"If these reports are correct, an assassination attempt against a sitting justice, or something close to it," McConnell said on the floor. "This is exactly the kind of event that many feared that terrible breach of the Court's rules and norms could fuel."
The top Senate Republican also complained the House had not quickly approved the Senate-passed bill.
Coons told CNN on Wednesday he is still working with the House on a compromise to enhance security, which could include extending protection to clerks and other staff.
"I've actually been engaging with several House members about how we come to a negotiated compromise on that bill and move it forward promptly," said Coons, noting that the main sticking point is "a relatively simple issue of whether or not the scope of it also includes clerks and other staff." -
wrote on 9 Jun 2022, 13:38 last edited by
Garland is a partisan hack. Thank God he was not put on SCOTUS.
-
wrote on 10 Jun 2022, 11:56 last edited by
When is AG Garland going to do his job and enforce the law?
Protesters Descend on Amy Coney Barrett’s Home
Protesters gathered on Thursday evening outside Supreme Court justice Amy Coney Barrett’s home, where she lives with her husband and seven children, according to reports.
The protests, as reported by George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, come one day after a California man allegedly attempted to assassinate Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh.
Early Wednesday morning, police detained 26-year-old Nicholas John Roske after he exited a taxi in front of Kavanaugh’s home in Maryland wearing black clothes, according to a criminal complaint. The man told authorities he called 911 because he was having suicidal thoughts. He told a dispatcher he had come “from California to kill a specific” Supreme Court justice, the affidavit said.
Authorities found a Glock 17 handgun with two magazines and ammunition, a tactical knife, pepper spray, zip ties, a hammer, a screwdriver, and other gear in Roske’s backpack.
-
wrote on 10 Jun 2022, 20:57 last edited by
-
wrote on 10 Jun 2022, 21:05 last edited by
@George-K said in Inexcusable:
This is how the WaPo betrays itself as center-right. They should not be reporting that story at all.
-
@George-K said in Inexcusable:
This is how the WaPo betrays itself as center-right. They should not be reporting that story at all.
wrote on 10 Jun 2022, 21:12 last edited by@Horace said in Inexcusable:
This is how the WaPo betrays itself as center-right.
That was about the New York Times. Get yer right-wing nuts straight, buddy.
-
@Horace said in Inexcusable:
This is how the WaPo betrays itself as center-right.
That was about the New York Times. Get yer right-wing nuts straight, buddy.
wrote on 10 Jun 2022, 21:14 last edited by@George-K said in Inexcusable:
@Horace said in Inexcusable:
This is how the WaPo betrays itself as center-right.
That was about the New York Times. Get yer right-wing nuts straight, buddy.
I know, I was making a clever cross-thread reference. Also note that the professor who thinks the NYT was center-right, claimed that there is no mainstream center-left paper. meaning, he doesn't believe WaPo is that.
-
@George-K said in Inexcusable:
@Horace said in Inexcusable:
This is how the WaPo betrays itself as center-right.
That was about the New York Times. Get yer right-wing nuts straight, buddy.
I know, I was making a clever cross-thread reference. Also note that the professor who thinks the NYT was center-right, claimed that there is no mainstream center-left paper. meaning, he doesn't believe WaPo is that.
-
wrote on 10 Jun 2022, 21:18 last edited by
@George-K said in Inexcusable:
Kinda depends. If the "plot" was writing "list of people I wanna kill" in crayon on the back of the CVS receipt, and the list included Ned Flanders and the Inventor of Raisins, would you be outraged if the story didn't make national news?
-
@George-K said in Inexcusable:
Kinda depends. If the "plot" was writing "list of people I wanna kill" in crayon on the back of the CVS receipt, and the list included Ned Flanders and the Inventor of Raisins, would you be outraged if the story didn't make national news?
wrote on 10 Jun 2022, 21:20 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in Inexcusable:
@George-K said in Inexcusable:
Kinda depends. If the "plot" was writing "list of people I wanna kill" in crayon on the back of the CVS receipt, and the list included Ned Flanders and the Inventor of Raisins, would you be outraged if the story didn't make national news?
I think it's safe to say that enough evidence exists to propagate a desirable narrative at the top of a publication's lungs, if such a narrative existed.
-
@George-K said in Inexcusable:
Kinda depends. If the "plot" was writing "list of people I wanna kill" in crayon on the back of the CVS receipt, and the list included Ned Flanders and the Inventor of Raisins, would you be outraged if the story didn't make national news?
wrote on 10 Jun 2022, 21:25 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in Inexcusable:
Kinda depends. If the "plot" was writing "list of people I wanna kill" in crayon on the back of the CVS receipt, and the list included Ned Flanders and the Inventor of Raisins, would you be outraged if the story didn't make national news?
He was arrested for attempted murder. That's a fact.
The intended victim was a Justice of the Supreme Court. That's another fact and it makes it national.And this is a "local story" along the lines of a home invasion or burglary?
"Darkness" indeed.
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in Inexcusable:
Kinda depends. If the "plot" was writing "list of people I wanna kill" in crayon on the back of the CVS receipt, and the list included Ned Flanders and the Inventor of Raisins, would you be outraged if the story didn't make national news?
He was arrested for attempted murder. That's a fact.
The intended victim was a Justice of the Supreme Court. That's another fact and it makes it national.And this is a "local story" along the lines of a home invasion or burglary?
"Darkness" indeed.
wrote on 10 Jun 2022, 21:31 last edited by@George-K said in Inexcusable:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Inexcusable:
Kinda depends. If the "plot" was writing "list of people I wanna kill" in crayon on the back of the CVS receipt, and the list included Ned Flanders and the Inventor of Raisins, would you be outraged if the story didn't make national news?
He was arrested for attempted murder. That's a fact.
The intended victim was a Justice of the Supreme Court. That's another fact and it makes it national.And this is a "local story" along the lines of a home invasion or burglary?
"Darkness" indeed.
Fair enough. Passes the threshold. Just saying that not all such stories actually do.
WaPo's a total joke anyway and the word's getting out.
-
wrote on 11 Jun 2022, 01:29 last edited by
Hallelujah!
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in Inexcusable:
Kinda depends. If the "plot" was writing "list of people I wanna kill" in crayon on the back of the CVS receipt, and the list included Ned Flanders and the Inventor of Raisins, would you be outraged if the story didn't make national news?
He was arrested for attempted murder. That's a fact.
The intended victim was a Justice of the Supreme Court. That's another fact and it makes it national.And this is a "local story" along the lines of a home invasion or burglary?
"Darkness" indeed.
wrote on 11 Jun 2022, 12:44 last edited by@George-K said in Inexcusable:
And this is a "local story" along the lines of a home invasion or burglary?
"Darkness" indeed.Even Nate Silver took notice:
And James Hodgkinson smiled.
-
wrote on 11 Jun 2022, 13:16 last edited by Horace 6 Nov 2022, 13:25
It’s slightly frustrating that there are those who continue to believe that concepts such as “the mainstream media” and the power it exerts over public opinion, are wingnut territory. Frustrating, because everybody who scoffs at those concepts is a perfect example of someone who has been indoctrinated by mainstream media bias. The term should more accurately be popular culture though, rather than mainstream media. Same concept, but popular culture is more descriptive of what is actually being referred to.
-
wrote on 15 Jun 2022, 12:06 last edited by
The House bill passed yesterday.
I see Mad Maxine voted "No" as well. Not a surprise there.
Link to video -
wrote on 15 Jun 2022, 12:18 last edited by
I have a buddy who's been a SCOTUS police officer for about 13 years. Gave us a really cool tour of the court (including the basketball court at the top... the highest court in the land... one time). He said things have been, umm, busy lately.
