Fertility clinics in some red states
-
They make many more embryos than they need and there are usually some left over that are eventually disposed of.
Maybe they could get by on a technicality by keeping them frozen forever.
@jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
They make many more embryos than they need and there are usually some left over that are eventually disposed of.
Maybe they could get by on a technicality by keeping them frozen forever.
There are always technicalities to appeal to if one wants to avoid moral obligations.
-
@jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
A few states have trigger laws that come into effect when Roe is overturned.
In some states, MO is an example, life will be defined as beginning at conception.
Does this effectively criminalize IVF clinics? I think it would, at least as currently practiced.
What about frozen fertilized eggs in storage? I suppose they should be trying to get them out of state fast.
Why would it criminalize IVF clinics? Don't kill the conceptus, and there is no problem.
I think it does certainly show the problem of IVF, that human beings can be frozen in an early stage of development and later reanimated, and that there are moral implications to this practice. But there is nothing obviously criminal (except morally criminal) about the practice.
@Ivorythumper said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
I think it does certainly show the problem of IVF, that human beings can be frozen in an early stage of development and later reanimated, and that there are moral implications to this practice.
How so? Does the Church have a problem with children who are conceived via IVF?
-
@Ivorythumper said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
I think it does certainly show the problem of IVF, that human beings can be frozen in an early stage of development and later reanimated, and that there are moral implications to this practice.
How so? Does the Church have a problem with children who are conceived via IVF?
@Aqua-Letifer said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
@Ivorythumper said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
I think it does certainly show the problem of IVF, that human beings can be frozen in an early stage of development and later reanimated, and that there are moral implications to this practice.
How so? Does the Church have a problem with children who are conceived via IVF?
The Church reprobates IVF as a practice, but does not have any problem with the children who are conceived by IVF.
The moral problem is the indignity to the human person who is held in suspension for the preference of the parents.
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
@Ivorythumper said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
I think it does certainly show the problem of IVF, that human beings can be frozen in an early stage of development and later reanimated, and that there are moral implications to this practice.
How so? Does the Church have a problem with children who are conceived via IVF?
The Church reprobates IVF as a practice, but does not have any problem with the children who are conceived by IVF.
The moral problem is the indignity to the human person who is held in suspension for the preference of the parents.
@Ivorythumper said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
@Ivorythumper said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
I think it does certainly show the problem of IVF, that human beings can be frozen in an early stage of development and later reanimated, and that there are moral implications to this practice.
How so? Does the Church have a problem with children who are conceived via IVF?
The Church reprobates IVF as a practice, but does not have any problem with the children who are conceived by IVF.
The moral problem is the indignity to the human person who is held in suspension for the preference of the parents.
What does "preference" mean in this context?
-
@jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
They make many more embryos than they need and there are usually some left over that are eventually disposed of.
Maybe they could get by on a technicality by keeping them frozen forever.
We started with like 14 embryos of which 7 were viable candidates for IVF... we had 5 failed IVFs, 1 successful, so we have 1 remaining right now. We pay like $600 a year to keep it on ice. TBD if we will attempt an IVF transfer, I'd imagine we will since it's the last one, but it would be a harder question if we had a few left.
-
It will be interesting to see how MO and other states handle the frozen ones.
Do they have a right to a womb? In the case of a donated egg, whose womb do they hold the claim on?
Will the state seek volunteers, essentially put them up for adoption?
-
@Ivorythumper said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
@Ivorythumper said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
I think it does certainly show the problem of IVF, that human beings can be frozen in an early stage of development and later reanimated, and that there are moral implications to this practice.
How so? Does the Church have a problem with children who are conceived via IVF?
The Church reprobates IVF as a practice, but does not have any problem with the children who are conceived by IVF.
The moral problem is the indignity to the human person who is held in suspension for the preference of the parents.
What does "preference" mean in this context?
@Aqua-Letifer said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
@Ivorythumper said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
@Ivorythumper said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
I think it does certainly show the problem of IVF, that human beings can be frozen in an early stage of development and later reanimated, and that there are moral implications to this practice.
How so? Does the Church have a problem with children who are conceived via IVF?
The Church reprobates IVF as a practice, but does not have any problem with the children who are conceived by IVF.
The moral problem is the indignity to the human person who is held in suspension for the preference of the parents.
What does "preference" mean in this context?
Well, preference is my term.
First, I want to tread carefully here, respectful of those who are or have been involved in IVF or have experienced the frustration, disappointment, heartbreak, and suffering of not being able to conceive naturally. I speak from personal experience, and have grappled morally with the Church's teaching.
Preference is deciding when and if that conceived offspring is to be allowed to join the family and enter into the mutual love relationship of family with his or her parents.
-
It will be interesting to see how MO and other states handle the frozen ones.
Do they have a right to a womb? In the case of a donated egg, whose womb do they hold the claim on?
Will the state seek volunteers, essentially put them up for adoption?
@jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
It will be interesting to see how MO and other states handle the frozen ones.
Do they have a right to a womb? In the case of a donated egg, whose womb do they hold the claim on?
Will the state seek volunteers, essentially put them up for adoption?
You're asking all the right questions.
-
I’ve seen estimates that the number of abortions will decrease only by about 10-15% since abortion is more common in states that are abortion friendly.
Also read that they are disproportionately obtained by black women.
So I’m guessing more black babies in red states is what we should expect.
-
I’ve seen estimates that the number of abortions will decrease only by about 10-15% since abortion is more common in states that are abortion friendly.
Also read that they are disproportionately obtained by black women.
So I’m guessing more black babies in red states is what we should expect.
@jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
So I’m guessing more black babies in red states is what we should expect.
Which could conceivably (pun intended) come back to bite Republicans in the ass
-
@jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
So I’m guessing more black babies in red states is what we should expect.
Which could conceivably (pun intended) come back to bite Republicans in the ass
@Doctor-Phibes said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
@jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
So I’m guessing more black babies in red states is what we should expect.
Which could conceivably (pun intended) come back to bite Republicans in the ass
Not with the generous amount of social assistance that is so prevalent in those states.
-
@jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
So I’m guessing more black babies in red states is what we should expect.
Which could conceivably (pun intended) come back to bite Republicans in the ass
@Doctor-Phibes said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
@jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
So I’m guessing more black babies in red states is what we should expect.
Which could conceivably (pun intended) come back to bite Republicans in the ass
that sort of pun should be condomed.
-
I’ve seen estimates that the number of abortions will decrease only by about 10-15% since abortion is more common in states that are abortion friendly.
Also read that they are disproportionately obtained by black women.
So I’m guessing more black babies in red states is what we should expect.
@jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
Also read that they are disproportionately obtained by black women.
So I’m guessing more black babies in red states is what we should expect.
I'm guessing more black women will simply keep their pants on
No more single moms struggling to get by
No more broken families
No more deadbeat dads
More dignity and self sufficiency
This will usher in the golden age of not-aborted black people
-
@jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
Also read that they are disproportionately obtained by black women.
So I’m guessing more black babies in red states is what we should expect.
I'm guessing more black women will simply keep their pants on
No more single moms struggling to get by
No more broken families
No more deadbeat dads
More dignity and self sufficiency
This will usher in the golden age of not-aborted black people
@Copper said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
I'm guessing more black women will simply keep their pants on
No more single moms struggling to get by
No more broken families
No more deadbeat dads
More dignity and self sufficiency
This will usher in the golden age of not-aborted black people
Half-full today. Good on ya, @copper!
-
@Copper said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
I'm guessing more black women will simply keep their pants on
No more single moms struggling to get by
No more broken families
No more deadbeat dads
More dignity and self sufficiency
This will usher in the golden age of not-aborted black people
Half-full today. Good on ya, @copper!
@George-K said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
@Copper said in Fertility clinics in some red states:
I'm guessing more black women will simply keep their pants on
No more single moms struggling to get by
No more broken families
No more deadbeat dads
More dignity and self sufficiency
This will usher in the golden age of not-aborted black people
Half-full today. Good on ya, @copper!
Half full of what, though?
-
Someone once wrote that, at first approximation, middle+ class use birth control, working class use abortion, and the poor use the crib.