What are you listening to - Podcast Edition?
-
It’s also traceable and illegal, as pointed out in the other thread.
I have noted that every time I bring up the actual well documented precedent of Biden’s DoJ really wanting to release incriminating evidence about Trump but not doing so when it can’t be done legally, it goes uncommented upon by you. You probably have a way of justifying how that is totally completely different. Or at least you’ll think of one now that I’ve made it particularly uncomfortable to ignore for a forth time.
-
It would require research on my part to investigate your analogy, which I am not familiar with. I give a very light weighting to the fact that you find it meaningful and compelling. I’ve considered asking you to flesh it out, but I’ve been told to do my own homework enough times not to have any interest in attempting good faith questions with you. I’m comfortable just assuming it’s a flimsy analogy, but you are always welcome to expand on it beyond your claims by assertion that it proves something about how we should never expect any anonymous whistle blower to contact the NYT with a story of what they saw in the files implicating Trump as a sex offender.
-
@jon-nyc said in What are you listening to - Podcast Edition?:
Ignoring it loudly. Forth time is a charm.
Yeah I didn’t think so. Without doing any research, I suspect the analogy crumbles when comparing the political value of leaking whatever it is you’re talking about, and leaking something damning regarding sex crimes. But I do not expect good faith efforts on your part to explain yourself. You’d rather posture as if you’re right, while being wrong quietly.
-
@jon-nyc said in What are you listening to - Podcast Edition?:
QED you found your difference.
Some leaks are worth decades in prison, others aren’t.
Your coyness would be more compelling if you established there was a there there beyond the posturing every once in a while. Exactly one of us is afraid to have actual good faith conversations, and it’s not me.
-
You’ve been constitutionally unable to have to have a good faith conversation with me since about 2017. The change did not go unnoticed nor unremarked upon by members here. If you didn’t notice the change, or have since buried it, you are the only one.
-
Great now is your chance, explain your analogy and how it proves what you think it proves. You won’t. Because you can’t.
A lot of people have left this place because you have a sadistic streak a mile wide. Duly noted that you like to posture that so many people have told you in private their thoughts about me. I know you love to play that card, as mean girls do. Yes my opinion of you has drastically changed since I’ve understood you as fundamentally a con man, though a relatively pro social one.
Education is extremely important.
-
Great now is your chance, explain your analogy and how it proves what you think it proves. You won’t. Because you can’t.
A lot of people have left this place because you have a sadistic streak a mile wide. Duly noted that you like to posture that so many people have told you in private their thoughts about me. I know you love to play that card, as mean girls do. Yes my opinion of you has drastically changed since I’ve understood you as fundamentally a con man, though a relatively pro social one.
@Horace said in What are you listening to - Podcast Edition?:
A lot of people have left this place because you have a sadistic streak a mile wide.
Not to brag, but I I like to think they left because of how stupid I am.
-
@jon-nyc said in What are you listening to - Podcast Edition?:
Not at all. That’s why they started posting here. You made them feel smart.
Sorry, I don't understand.
-
(And for those of you keeping score at home, a Trump voter just called me a con man. I think I might just survive this.)
@jon-nyc said in What are you listening to - Podcast Edition?:
(And for those of you keeping score at home, a Trump voter just called me a con man. I think I might just survive this.)
You’ve definitely survived worse. I don’t expect your psychological armor to be dented.
-
Odd that you came to the realization after a dozen years here and it coincided with the day your ego was damaged.
@jon-nyc said in What are you listening to - Podcast Edition?:
Odd that you came to the realization after a dozen years here and it coincided with the day your ego was damaged.
Yes please posture that you have an insight into something, while not being able to substantiate the insight. Yes do that for the 1000th time and fifth time today.
-
Great now is your chance, explain your analogy and how it proves what you think it proves. You won’t. Because you can’t.
A lot of people have left this place because you have a sadistic streak a mile wide. Duly noted that you like to posture that so many people have told you in private their thoughts about me. I know you love to play that card, as mean girls do. Yes my opinion of you has drastically changed since I’ve understood you as fundamentally a con man, though a relatively pro social one.
@Horace said in What are you listening to - Podcast Edition?:
Duly noted that you like to posture that so many people have told you in private their thoughts about me.
That doesn’t really capture it. What struck so many of them was how suddenly and fiercely you turned on me. It seemed to them out of the blue. So when they reached out it was typically asking me WTF happened.
So I had to explain that you finally realized I was a con man and that made you really really angry. Then they understood.
-
@Horace said in What are you listening to - Podcast Edition?:
Duly noted that you like to posture that so many people have told you in private their thoughts about me.
That doesn’t really capture it. What struck so many of them was how suddenly and fiercely you turned on me. It seemed to them out of the blue. So when they reached out it was typically asking me WTF happened.
So I had to explain that you finally realized I was a con man and that made you really really angry. Then they understood.
@jon-nyc said in What are you listening to - Podcast Edition?:
@Horace said in What are you listening to - Podcast Edition?:
Duly noted that you like to posture that so many people have told you in private their thoughts about me.
That doesn’t really capture it. What struck so many of them was how suddenly and fiercely you turned on me. It seemed to them out of the blue. So when they reached out it was typically asking me WTF happened.
So I had to explain that you finally realized I was a con man and that made you really really angry. Then they understood.
Wow what a great opportunity for you to frame the narrative. I’m sure what you told them, to whatever extent they actually exist, tracks with objective reality and steel manned my perspective. Good thing each one of our interactions are right here for anybody with a triple digit IQ to attempt to follow. For my part I’m comfy with that.
-
Why does nobody ever PM me about other posters?
Well OK, I've had a running PM dialogue with Aqua's Sister for years, but that doesn't really count.
