Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter
-
@Axtremus said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
- Jeff Bezos brought up the possibility of the CCP leveraging Tesla to influence Musk on Twitter’s policies regarding China — the theory being that because Tesla relies on much of its production in China, the CCP can hold Tesla hostage to force Musk to make Twitter give China-related content special treatments.
OK, Jeff. Now do Disney, NBO, Apple, and China.
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 15:48 last edited by@George-K said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
Now do Disney, NBO, Apple, and China.
Apple and Disney’s reactions to various CCP demand are well documented (e.g., removing certain apps for iOS users in Hong Kong to manage the protests there back in 2020, avoiding the likeness of the Dalai Lama in the Marvel Cinematic Universe), a change in control is not on the horizon for either Disney or Apple, in the context of the interview Bezos was asked only about Twitter, not about Apple or Disney or any other company. So I see no ground to chastise Bezos for not commenting on Disney or Apple.
No idea what NBO is or why you think NBO needs to be thus examined, kindly elaborate if you wish.
-
@George-K said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
Now do Disney, NBO, Apple, and China.
Apple and Disney’s reactions to various CCP demand are well documented (e.g., removing certain apps for iOS users in Hong Kong to manage the protests there back in 2020, avoiding the likeness of the Dalai Lama in the Marvel Cinematic Universe), a change in control is not on the horizon for either Disney or Apple, in the context of the interview Bezos was asked only about Twitter, not about Apple or Disney or any other company. So I see no ground to chastise Bezos for not commenting on Disney or Apple.
No idea what NBO is or why you think NBO needs to be thus examined, kindly elaborate if you wish.
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 16:08 last edited by@Axtremus said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
No idea what NBO is or why you think NBO needs to be thus examined, kindly elaborate if you wish.
Typo NBA.
-
Read a couple of interesting reactions:
-
Jack Dorsey, former CEO and founder of Twitter, now openly says he thinks Musk buying Twitter is a very good thing. (Dorsey stands to cash close to $1 Billion from this buyout, but no, I don’t think Dorsey says this because of the money; the guy is rich enough that he doesn’t need to lie for cash.)
-
Jeff Bezos brought up the possibility of the CCP leveraging Tesla to influence Musk on Twitter’s policies regarding China — the theory being that because Tesla relies on much of its production in China, the CCP can hold Tesla hostage to force Musk to make Twitter give China-related content special treatments.
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 16:11 last edited by@Axtremus said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
because Tesla relies on much of its production in China, the CCP can hold Tesla hostage to force Musk to make Twitter give China-related content special treatments.
China probably told Musk to buy Twitter.
I just made that up.
A good way to test the theory might be to tweet it.
-
-
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 16:21 last edited by
And just like that, conspiracy theories became ok.
-
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 16:22 last edited by
@Horace said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
And just like that, conspiracy theories became ok.
That is one of the prices we pay for free speech.
-
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 16:42 last edited by
-
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 17:07 last edited by
I’ve heard a lot of people, seemingly intelligent and knowledgeable ones, claim that if you scratch the surface of Musk, he has at best mediocre technical chops. I wonder about the truth of that.
-
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 17:11 last edited by jon-nyc
Well I assume that’s true and that Isaacson being a journalist doesn’t really know the difference between him asking questions/running the meeting and trying to solve it himself.
-
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 17:16 last edited by
@Jolly said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
$64 question: In 12 months, how much effect will Musk have on the Twitter profit/loss line?
He says it’s not about money for him but I think he will tire of subsidizing it at some point and try to improve the cash flow.
-
@Jolly said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
$64 question: In 12 months, how much effect will Musk have on the Twitter profit/loss line?
He says it’s not about money for him but I think he will tire of subsidizing it at some point and try to improve the cash flow.
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 17:27 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
@Jolly said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
$64 question: In 12 months, how much effect will Musk have on the Twitter profit/loss line?
He says it’s not about money for him but I think he will tire of subsidizing it at some point and try to improve the cash flow.
he could bleed that for a century and not notice... (unless of course his stock tanked)...
-
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 17:34 last edited by
Yes an no, he has a lot of assets but selling them results in a big tax liability which would probably grate over time.
-
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 17:59 last edited by
"If I had enough money, instead of buying Twitter, I'd buy a 3 bedroom, 1 bath house in San Francisco."
-
"If I had enough money, instead of buying Twitter, I'd buy a 3 bedroom, 1 bath house in San Francisco."
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 18:29 last edited by@George-K said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
"If I had enough money, instead of buying Twitter, I'd buy a 3 bedroom, 1 bath house in San Francisco."
All good comedy has an element of truth.
-
@George-K said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
"If I had enough money, instead of buying Twitter, I'd buy a 3 bedroom, 1 bath house in San Francisco."
All good comedy has an element of truth.
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 18:47 last edited by@Jolly said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
All good comedy has an element of truth.
...and pathos.
-
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 19:09 last edited by
-
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 20:25 last edited by
One of the talking heads on CNN just lamented that Elon Musk could now influence elections by deplatforming candidates or by manipulating the algorithms to suppress news stories damaging to other candidates…
-
One of the talking heads on CNN just lamented that Elon Musk could now influence elections by deplatforming candidates or by manipulating the algorithms to suppress news stories damaging to other candidates…
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 20:34 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
One of the talking heads on CNN just lamented that Elon Musk could now influence elections by deplatforming candidates or by manipulating the algorithms to suppress news stories damaging to other candidates…
The fact that they unapologetically and righteously did exactly that, must make the fear all the more real in their minds. Terrified of their own shadow.
-
Read a couple of interesting reactions:
-
Jack Dorsey, former CEO and founder of Twitter, now openly says he thinks Musk buying Twitter is a very good thing. (Dorsey stands to cash close to $1 Billion from this buyout, but no, I don’t think Dorsey says this because of the money; the guy is rich enough that he doesn’t need to lie for cash.)
-
Jeff Bezos brought up the possibility of the CCP leveraging Tesla to influence Musk on Twitter’s policies regarding China — the theory being that because Tesla relies on much of its production in China, the CCP can hold Tesla hostage to force Musk to make Twitter give China-related content special treatments.
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 20:42 last edited by George K@Axtremus said in Elon Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter:
- Jeff Bezos brought up the possibility of the CCP leveraging Tesla to influence Musk on Twitter’s policies regarding China — the theory being that because Tesla relies on much of its production in China, the CCP can hold Tesla hostage to force Musk to make Twitter give China-related content special treatments.
Bezos launches China conspiracy theory
Bezos’ commentary on Tesla’s relationship with China is peculiar given a Reuters investigation in December that found Amazon had capitulated to demands from China to continue doing business and grow the company there.
In addition, some 38% of Amazon's top-selling brands are based in China, a report from the firm Daxue Consulting found late last year.
And, in 2019, the Washington Post – which Bezos bought in 2013 – included an eight-page "advertising supplement" touting the achievements and talking points of the Chinese government in a section that was off-limits to the paper’s editors.
Special Report: Amazon partnered with China propaganda arm
Amazon.com Inc was marketing a collection of President Xi Jinping's speeches and writings on its Chinese website about two years ago, when Beijing delivered an edict, according to two people familiar with the incident. The American e-commerce giant must stop allowing any customer ratings and reviews in China.
A negative review of Xi's book prompted the demand, one of the people said. "I think the issue was anything under five stars," the highest rating in Amazon's five-point system, said the other person.
Ratings and reviews are a crucial part of Amazon's e-commerce business, a major way of engaging shoppers. But Amazon complied, the two people said. Currently, on its Chinese site Amazon.cn, the government-published book has no customer reviews or any ratings. And the comments section is disabled.
"And the comments section is disabled."
At least Amazon doesn't die in darkness, right?
-
-
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 20:51 last edited by
George - how is that a conspiracy theory?
-
wrote on 26 Apr 2022, 20:57 last edited by
TSLA was down 12% today. That means Musk lost almost as much today as Twitter is costing him.