National Geographic Picture of The Year
-
Of course they would pick a white animal (it's true...zebras are white, with black stripes). Cool image though, drones have changed photography for sure.
@89th said in National Geographic Picture of The Year:
Of course they would pick a white animal (it's true...zebras are white, with black stripes). Cool image though, drones have changed photography for sure.
Temporarily, just like 35 mm. Then the trick will wear off and we'll be back to being impressed by only good drone work that doesn't rely on the novelty of shooting straight down.
-
That is a great picture!!!
-
It verges on the clever a little too much. I mean there's no real meaning to the picture, it doesn't tell a story or evoke your mind to create a story, it's just clever.
@Horace said in National Geographic Picture of The Year:
It verges on the clever a little too much. I mean there's no real meaning to the picture, it doesn't tell a story or evoke your mind to create a story, it's just clever.
Not even that clever. Street photographers have been doing this trick with film cameras for years. But the average viewer doesn't see 'em, so the trick is still novel.
-
Oh except the above photo was taken 10 years ago... by a photographer who used a paraglider. Boom.
https://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/13/floating-in-the-desert-air/
-
You don't need a drone or a paraglider.
It's an old trick.
-
It surprises me that people at NG who should be connoisseurs of photography would consider such pulp a photo of the year winner.
@Horace said in National Geographic Picture of The Year:
It surprises me that people at NG who should be connoisseurs of photography would consider such pulp a photo of the year winner.
Eh, I think it's because they're legacy media now and people who might've made incredible documentary photographers moved on to video. Look what happened to the Pulitzers.
Also, sadly, what's the minority status of the photographer?
-
I still think it is a cool photo.
LOL
