Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Kozyrev on Putin

Kozyrev on Putin

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
14 Posts 8 Posters 161 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    He was a post-Soviet Foreign Minister and in the Duma under Putin.

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Away
      MikM Away
      Mik
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I would have to agree. With him. Putin sees something to gain and annihalation is not it.

      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

      Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Mik

        I would have to agree. With him. Putin sees something to gain and annihalation is not it.

        Aqua LetiferA Offline
        Aqua LetiferA Offline
        Aqua Letifer
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @Mik said in Kozyrev on Putin:

        I would have to agree. With him. Putin sees something to gain and annihalation is not it.

        Sure, but what does a losing Russia look like in this context? What's he willing to live with?

        Please love yourself.

        kluursK 1 Reply Last reply
        • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

          @Mik said in Kozyrev on Putin:

          I would have to agree. With him. Putin sees something to gain and annihalation is not it.

          Sure, but what does a losing Russia look like in this context? What's he willing to live with?

          kluursK Offline
          kluursK Offline
          kluurs
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

          @Mik said in Kozyrev on Putin:

          I would have to agree. With him. Putin sees something to gain and annihalation is not it.

          Sure, but what does a losing Russia look like in this context? What's he willing to live with?

          During the Cuban missile crisis, it was alleged that Kennedy sought a way for Khrushchev to be able to back down without losing face. I don't see a way that Putin can back down. And appeasement isn't nearly as popular as it once was. In an ideal world, Ukraine should keep sovereignty and retake lost territory including Crimea. But then I'd like to believe in unicorns and the tooth fairy.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            One conceivable face saving exit would be a promise not to extend NATO into Ukraine. Maybe for a period of time.

            But I kind of think he either will need to win or be deposed. Though the 'win' will be pyrrhic.

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            89th8 1 Reply Last reply
            • Aqua LetiferA Offline
              Aqua LetiferA Offline
              Aqua Letifer
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

              Please love yourself.

              HoraceH kluursK 2 Replies Last reply
              • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

                @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

                HoraceH Offline
                HoraceH Offline
                Horace
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

                Anybody who wants a nice comfy high status life wouldn't deploy nukes. We can hope that includes Putin and his circle.

                Education is extremely important.

                Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  One conceivable face saving exit would be a promise not to extend NATO into Ukraine. Maybe for a period of time.

                  But I kind of think he either will need to win or be deposed. Though the 'win' will be pyrrhic.

                  89th8 Offline
                  89th8 Offline
                  89th
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @jon-nyc said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                  But I kind of think he either will need to win or be deposed. Though the 'win' will be pyrrhic.

                  That is my hope as well. However, the more russian troops that die makes that a harder and harder exit.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • HoraceH Horace

                    @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                    @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

                    Anybody who wants a nice comfy high status life wouldn't deploy nukes. We can hope that includes Putin and his circle.

                    Aqua LetiferA Offline
                    Aqua LetiferA Offline
                    Aqua Letifer
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @Horace said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                    @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                    @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

                    Anybody who wants a nice comfy high status life wouldn't deploy nukes.

                    How do you figure?

                    Please love yourself.

                    HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                    • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

                      @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

                      kluursK Offline
                      kluursK Offline
                      kluurs
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                      @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

                      I don't see any way where Ukraine goes back to pre-2014 borders while Putin lives. I don't think Russia will use nukes. I believe Russia will by the end of the summer control Ukraine after a fierce cost to both sides.

                      I am guessing a higher probability that Russia will launch some limited but significant cyber attacks against the West to discourage greater support of Ukraine - probably hitting Europe harder than the US. Hit infrastructure and economic targets in Europe - and attack a few key financial enterprises in the US. What Biden is threatening Putin with if this happens is anyone's guess as we've already hit Russia with nearly everything we have in the cupboard.

                      In the past, it was always felt that tactical nukes would be used if Russia planned a blitz across eastern Europe - but looking at the ineptness of the current campaign, "blitz" seems off the table. I don't see nukes coming into play - even if the tide turns in Ukraine and miraculously, Russian troops are repelled out of the country - unless Crimea was attacked. He then might feel he needs to save face.

                      JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

                        @Horace said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                        @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                        @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

                        Anybody who wants a nice comfy high status life wouldn't deploy nukes.

                        How do you figure?

                        HoraceH Offline
                        HoraceH Offline
                        Horace
                        wrote on last edited by Horace
                        #11

                        @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                        @Horace said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                        @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                        @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

                        Anybody who wants a nice comfy high status life wouldn't deploy nukes.

                        How do you figure?

                        I figure a post-nuclear war world will no longer be comfy for anybody, even those at the top of hierarchies, as long as they remember what it used to be.

                        Education is extremely important.

                        Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                        • kluursK kluurs

                          @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                          @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

                          I don't see any way where Ukraine goes back to pre-2014 borders while Putin lives. I don't think Russia will use nukes. I believe Russia will by the end of the summer control Ukraine after a fierce cost to both sides.

                          I am guessing a higher probability that Russia will launch some limited but significant cyber attacks against the West to discourage greater support of Ukraine - probably hitting Europe harder than the US. Hit infrastructure and economic targets in Europe - and attack a few key financial enterprises in the US. What Biden is threatening Putin with if this happens is anyone's guess as we've already hit Russia with nearly everything we have in the cupboard.

                          In the past, it was always felt that tactical nukes would be used if Russia planned a blitz across eastern Europe - but looking at the ineptness of the current campaign, "blitz" seems off the table. I don't see nukes coming into play - even if the tide turns in Ukraine and miraculously, Russian troops are repelled out of the country - unless Crimea was attacked. He then might feel he needs to save face.

                          JollyJ Offline
                          JollyJ Offline
                          Jolly
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          @kluurs said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                          @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                          @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

                          I don't see any way where Ukraine goes back to pre-2014 borders while Putin lives. I don't think Russia will use nukes. I believe Russia will by the end of the summer control Ukraine after a fierce cost to both sides.

                          I am guessing a higher probability that Russia will launch some limited but significant cyber attacks against the West to discourage greater support of Ukraine - probably hitting Europe harder than the US. Hit infrastructure and economic targets in Europe - and attack a few key financial enterprises in the US. What Biden is threatening Putin with if this happens is anyone's guess as we've already hit Russia with nearly everything we have in the cupboard.

                          In the past, it was always felt that tactical nukes would be used if Russia planned a blitz across eastern Europe - but looking at the ineptness of the current campaign, "blitz" seems off the table. I don't see nukes coming into play - even if the tide turns in Ukraine and miraculously, Russian troops are repelled out of the country - unless Crimea was attacked. He then might feel he needs to save face.

                          What about a No-Fly Zone in Ukraine?

                          Or maybe a modern day version of the AVG, featuring an international group of pilots?

                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                          kluursK 1 Reply Last reply
                          • HoraceH Horace

                            @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                            @Horace said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                            @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                            @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

                            Anybody who wants a nice comfy high status life wouldn't deploy nukes.

                            How do you figure?

                            I figure a post-nuclear war world will no longer be comfy for anybody, even those at the top of hierarchies, as long as they remember what it used to be.

                            Doctor PhibesD Online
                            Doctor PhibesD Online
                            Doctor Phibes
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @Horace said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                            @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                            @Horace said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                            @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                            @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

                            Anybody who wants a nice comfy high status life wouldn't deploy nukes.

                            How do you figure?

                            I figure a post-nuclear war world will no longer be comfy for anybody, even those at the top of hierarchies, as long as they remember what it used to be.

                            Anybody who thinks that a nuclear war would improve the world in any way whatsoever needs to be given a set of crayons and one of those lab-coats that fastens at the back.

                            I was only joking

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • JollyJ Jolly

                              @kluurs said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                              @Aqua-Letifer said in Kozyrev on Putin:

                              @kluurs @jon-nyc What odds do you give nukes? I don't see how we don't get there from here.

                              I don't see any way where Ukraine goes back to pre-2014 borders while Putin lives. I don't think Russia will use nukes. I believe Russia will by the end of the summer control Ukraine after a fierce cost to both sides.

                              I am guessing a higher probability that Russia will launch some limited but significant cyber attacks against the West to discourage greater support of Ukraine - probably hitting Europe harder than the US. Hit infrastructure and economic targets in Europe - and attack a few key financial enterprises in the US. What Biden is threatening Putin with if this happens is anyone's guess as we've already hit Russia with nearly everything we have in the cupboard.

                              In the past, it was always felt that tactical nukes would be used if Russia planned a blitz across eastern Europe - but looking at the ineptness of the current campaign, "blitz" seems off the table. I don't see nukes coming into play - even if the tide turns in Ukraine and miraculously, Russian troops are repelled out of the country - unless Crimea was attacked. He then might feel he needs to save face.

                              What about a No-Fly Zone in Ukraine?

                              Or maybe a modern day version of the AVG, featuring an international group of pilots?

                              kluursK Offline
                              kluursK Offline
                              kluurs
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              What about a No-Fly Zone in Ukraine?

                              Or maybe a modern day version of the AVG, featuring an international group of pilots?

                              I could imagine pilots being contracted to provide air support and other Soldier of Fortune types showing up to "beat those commies" into submission. The US and allies could covertly support them.

                              Of course, Putin would see that as license for indiscretions to sabotage NATO capabilities. Again, I think Putin feels he has a great advantage over his adversaries once this moves further into asymmetric warfare as he's already been hit pretty hard and may feel he has less to lose moving forward.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups