Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence
-
wrote on 30 May 2020, 17:10 last edited by
I don't quite think that's how it works. With basically anything.
-
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
wrote on 30 May 2020, 17:11 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
Mainstream media = liberal media. Conservative media can't be considered mainstream because "mainstream" means to have power over.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
Mainstream media = liberal media. Conservative media can't be considered mainstream because "mainstream" means to have power over.
wrote on 30 May 2020, 17:14 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
Mainstream media = liberal media. Conservative media can't be considered mainstream because "mainstream" means to have power over.
Speaking as a middle aged, middle class white male, I know oppression when I see it.
-
wrote on 30 May 2020, 17:16 last edited by
-
It seems tautological to say mainstream media is ideological when you have an ideological litmus test for your definition of mainstream.
There's no way NewsCorp's US properties would be excluded from any non-ideological definition of mainstream.
wrote on 30 May 2020, 21:46 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
It seems tautological to say mainstream media is ideological when you have an ideological litmus test for your definition of mainstream.
There's no way NewsCorp's US properties would be excluded from any non-ideological definition of mainstream.
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
In both examples, the overwhelming majority of journalists are Democrats and their money went mostly (over 80%) to Ms. Clinton.
That in itself, does not prove bias in their reporting. But I also don't have to know a fish has been dead for awhile when I smell it...
-
wrote on 30 May 2020, 21:52 last edited by
You'd think the lefties would admit that pop culture is on their side, by and large.
-
@jon-nyc said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
It seems tautological to say mainstream media is ideological when you have an ideological litmus test for your definition of mainstream.
There's no way NewsCorp's US properties would be excluded from any non-ideological definition of mainstream.
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
In both examples, the overwhelming majority of journalists are Democrats and their money went mostly (over 80%) to Ms. Clinton.
That in itself, does not prove bias in their reporting. But I also don't have to know a fish has been dead for awhile when I smell it...
wrote on 30 May 2020, 21:55 last edited by@Jolly said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
âMembers of the military giving three times as much to Clinton as to Trumpâ
-
wrote on 30 May 2020, 22:23 last edited by
@Horace said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
You'd think the lefties would admit that pop culture is on their side, by and large.
All of it? Absolutely all of it. Globally, you're saying.
-
@Jolly said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
âMembers of the military giving three times as much to Clinton as to Trumpâ
wrote on 30 May 2020, 22:29 last edited by Loki@Axtremus said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
@Jolly said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
âMembers of the military giving three times as much to Clinton as to Trumpâ
2016, before the election when it was quite sure that Hillary would win. Having a data point now would be quite interesting, except for the fact they are mostly enlisted folk so I donât think they represent anything but the population at large.
-
@Horace said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
You'd think the lefties would admit that pop culture is on their side, by and large.
All of it? Absolutely all of it. Globally, you're saying.
wrote on 30 May 2020, 22:32 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
@Horace said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
You'd think the lefties would admit that pop culture is on their side, by and large.
All of it? Absolutely all of it. Globally, you're saying.
"by and large" doesn't mean an absolute.