Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence
-
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
I was only joking
-
I don't quite think that's how it works. With basically anything.
-
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
Mainstream media = liberal media. Conservative media can't be considered mainstream because "mainstream" means to have power over.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
Mainstream media = liberal media. Conservative media can't be considered mainstream because "mainstream" means to have power over.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
Mainstream media = liberal media. Conservative media can't be considered mainstream because "mainstream" means to have power over.
Speaking as a middle aged, middle class white male, I know oppression when I see it.
-
-
It seems tautological to say mainstream media is ideological when you have an ideological litmus test for your definition of mainstream.
There's no way NewsCorp's US properties would be excluded from any non-ideological definition of mainstream.
@jon-nyc said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
It seems tautological to say mainstream media is ideological when you have an ideological litmus test for your definition of mainstream.
There's no way NewsCorp's US properties would be excluded from any non-ideological definition of mainstream.
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
In both examples, the overwhelming majority of journalists are Democrats and their money went mostly (over 80%) to Ms. Clinton.
That in itself, does not prove bias in their reporting. But I also don't have to know a fish has been dead for awhile when I smell it...
âCry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!â
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terroristsâ "due process". â Buck Sexton
-
@jon-nyc said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
It seems tautological to say mainstream media is ideological when you have an ideological litmus test for your definition of mainstream.
There's no way NewsCorp's US properties would be excluded from any non-ideological definition of mainstream.
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
In both examples, the overwhelming majority of journalists are Democrats and their money went mostly (over 80%) to Ms. Clinton.
That in itself, does not prove bias in their reporting. But I also don't have to know a fish has been dead for awhile when I smell it...
@Jolly said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
âMembers of the military giving three times as much to Clinton as to Trumpâ
-
@Horace said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
You'd think the lefties would admit that pop culture is on their side, by and large.
All of it? Absolutely all of it. Globally, you're saying.
Please love yourself.
-
@Jolly said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
âMembers of the military giving three times as much to Clinton as to Trumpâ
@Axtremus said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
@Jolly said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
âMembers of the military giving three times as much to Clinton as to Trumpâ
2016, before the election when it was quite sure that Hillary would win. Having a data point now would be quite interesting, except for the fact they are mostly enlisted folk so I donât think they represent anything but the population at large.
-
@Horace said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
You'd think the lefties would admit that pop culture is on their side, by and large.
All of it? Absolutely all of it. Globally, you're saying.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
@Horace said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
You'd think the lefties would admit that pop culture is on their side, by and large.
All of it? Absolutely all of it. Globally, you're saying.
"by and large" doesn't mean an absolute.
