Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence
-
Microsoft 'to replace journalists with robots'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-52860247“The curating of stories from news organisations and selection of headlines and pictures for the MSN site is currently done by journalists.
Artificial intelligence will perform these news production tasks, ...”
Microsoft is cutting dozens of MSN news production workers and replacing them with artificial intelligence
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/local-business/microsoft-is-cutting-dozens-of-msn-news-production-workers-and-replacing-them-with-artificial-intelligence/ -
Journalism is already a mono culture already so the threat of loss of diversity is non existent.
@Loki said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
Journalism is already a mono culture already so the threat of loss of diversity is non existent.
Yes because liberal and conservative journalists constitute a mono culture.
-
@Loki said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
Journalism is already a mono culture already so the threat of loss of diversity is non existent.
Yes because liberal and conservative journalists constitute a mono culture.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
@Loki said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
Journalism is already a mono culture already so the threat of loss of diversity is non existent.
Yes because liberal and conservative journalists constitute a mono culture.
Um main stream media is a mono culture. In fact you can’t survive in main stream media if you veer from the party line. Even Dorsey shit himself and succumbed to his friends.
I’m sure fox will be just fine.
-
So journalism is a mono culture because mainstream media is a monoculture. That's like a guy saying "all women are gold diggers" because that describes his ex-wife.
-
It seems tautological to say mainstream media is ideological when you have an ideological litmus test for your definition of mainstream.
There's no way NewsCorp's US properties would be excluded from any non-ideological definition of mainstream.
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
I was only joking
-
I don't quite think that's how it works. With basically anything.
-
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
Mainstream media = liberal media. Conservative media can't be considered mainstream because "mainstream" means to have power over.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
Mainstream media = liberal media. Conservative media can't be considered mainstream because "mainstream" means to have power over.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
How is Murdoch not mainstream media? Never mind just looking at the US - look at his organization globally.
It doesn't get more mainstream.
Mainstream media = liberal media. Conservative media can't be considered mainstream because "mainstream" means to have power over.
Speaking as a middle aged, middle class white male, I know oppression when I see it.
-
-
It seems tautological to say mainstream media is ideological when you have an ideological litmus test for your definition of mainstream.
There's no way NewsCorp's US properties would be excluded from any non-ideological definition of mainstream.
@jon-nyc said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
It seems tautological to say mainstream media is ideological when you have an ideological litmus test for your definition of mainstream.
There's no way NewsCorp's US properties would be excluded from any non-ideological definition of mainstream.
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
In both examples, the overwhelming majority of journalists are Democrats and their money went mostly (over 80%) to Ms. Clinton.
That in itself, does not prove bias in their reporting. But I also don't have to know a fish has been dead for awhile when I smell it...
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
@jon-nyc said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
It seems tautological to say mainstream media is ideological when you have an ideological litmus test for your definition of mainstream.
There's no way NewsCorp's US properties would be excluded from any non-ideological definition of mainstream.
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
In both examples, the overwhelming majority of journalists are Democrats and their money went mostly (over 80%) to Ms. Clinton.
That in itself, does not prove bias in their reporting. But I also don't have to know a fish has been dead for awhile when I smell it...
@Jolly said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
”Members of the military giving three times as much to Clinton as to Trump”
-
@Horace said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
You'd think the lefties would admit that pop culture is on their side, by and large.
All of it? Absolutely all of it. Globally, you're saying.
Please love yourself.
-
@Jolly said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
”Members of the military giving three times as much to Clinton as to Trump”
@Axtremus said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
@Jolly said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
One of the few definitive state we have, is percent of registered Democrats in journalism and what percentage of journalists contributed to Trump's campaign and what percentage contributed to Hillary's.
”Members of the military giving three times as much to Clinton as to Trump”
2016, before the election when it was quite sure that Hillary would win. Having a data point now would be quite interesting, except for the fact they are mostly enlisted folk so I don’t think they represent anything but the population at large.
-
@Horace said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
You'd think the lefties would admit that pop culture is on their side, by and large.
All of it? Absolutely all of it. Globally, you're saying.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
@Horace said in Replacing Journalists with Artificial Intelligence:
You'd think the lefties would admit that pop culture is on their side, by and large.
All of it? Absolutely all of it. Globally, you're saying.
"by and large" doesn't mean an absolute.
