What is a woman?
-
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 13:47 last edited by Jolly
What is a woman?
As Walsh is quoted in the article, An adult human female. He then bases his claim on DNA.
I don't think we have to get any more complicated than that. Anything else is nothing more than the old Indian myth of the skinwalker.
-
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 13:58 last edited by
Not in our current transgender discussion.
-
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 14:02 last edited by
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
Not in our current transgender discussion.
Do you feel the same about Walsh’s answer for “what is woman”?
-
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 14:07 last edited by
What do you think about what Walsh said?
-
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 14:18 last edited by
And this is why I prefer Walsh's definition vs. the current nonsense...
-
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 14:20 last edited by
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
What do you think about what Walsh said?
So far very little, though to be fair I haven’t really look into the totality of what Walsh has said on the subject, just skimmed through snippets of PJ Media/Megan Fox’s creation to what Walsh supposedly have said.
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
Not in our current transgender discussion.
Do you feel the same about Walsh’s answer for “what is woman”?
-
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 14:28 last edited by
Pretty much.
It's a simple, irrefutable answer to an uncomplicated biological question. Anything else is a bizarre social construct superimposed by people desperately seeking acceptance and validation.
Not to mention, being fucked up in the head.
-
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 14:31 last edited by
-
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
Good for Matt Walsh, but what the hell was that "writing" supposed to be? "Getta loada mah boi! Yah das RIGHT, das RIGHT!"
That's literally the emotional equivalent of what her words amounted to. She has nothing to add other than "get a load of Matt Walsh throwing straight fire!", which, what the fuck. This is journalism now?
Your missing part of the point. Consider the platform, the audience and current national zeitgeist.
No amount of context is going to inject any kind of value into what she wrote.
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 14:33 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
Good for Matt Walsh, but what the hell was that "writing" supposed to be? "Getta loada mah boi! Yah das RIGHT, das RIGHT!"
That's literally the emotional equivalent of what her words amounted to. She has nothing to add other than "get a load of Matt Walsh throwing straight fire!", which, what the fuck. This is journalism now?
Your missing part of the point. Consider the platform, the audience and current national zeitgeist.
No amount of context is going to inject any kind of value into what she wrote.
And now, this has morphed into a discussion of substance over style, which is what I thought when I posted it.
Care to comment now?
-
Pretty much.
It's a simple, irrefutable answer to an uncomplicated biological question. Anything else is a bizarre social construct superimposed by people desperately seeking acceptance and validation.
Not to mention, being fucked up in the head.
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 14:43 last edited by@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
It's a simple, irrefutable answer to an uncomplicated biological question. Anything else is a bizarre social construct superimposed by people desperately seeking acceptance and validation.
What is a bitch? A female dog, wolf, fox, or otter.
Next time you use “bitch” for anything else, know that its probably just you desperately seeking acceptance and validation using a bizarre social construct.
-
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
It's a simple, irrefutable answer to an uncomplicated biological question. Anything else is a bizarre social construct superimposed by people desperately seeking acceptance and validation.
What is a bitch? A female dog, wolf, fox, or otter.
Next time you use “bitch” for anything else, know that its probably just you desperately seeking acceptance and validation using a bizarre social construct.
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 14:45 last edited by@Axtremus said in What is a woman?:
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
It's a simple, irrefutable answer to an uncomplicated biological question. Anything else is a bizarre social construct superimposed by people desperately seeking acceptance and validation.
What is a bitch? A female dog, wolf, fox, or otter.
Next time you use “bitch” for anything else, know that its probably just you desperately seeking acceptance and validation using a bizarre social construct.
What's scary is that you actually believe you just made a point.
-
@Axtremus said in What is a woman?:
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
It's a simple, irrefutable answer to an uncomplicated biological question. Anything else is a bizarre social construct superimposed by people desperately seeking acceptance and validation.
What is a bitch? A female dog, wolf, fox, or otter.
Next time you use “bitch” for anything else, know that its probably just you desperately seeking acceptance and validation using a bizarre social construct.
What's scary is that you actually believe you just made a point.
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 14:45 last edited by@Larry said in What is a woman?:
@Axtremus said in What is a woman?:
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
It's a simple, irrefutable answer to an uncomplicated biological question. Anything else is a bizarre social construct superimposed by people desperately seeking acceptance and validation.
What is a bitch? A female dog, wolf, fox, or otter.
Next time you use “bitch” for anything else, know that its probably just you desperately seeking acceptance and validation using a bizarre social construct.
What's scary is that you actually believe you just made a point.
You, sir, are right.
-
Hey @Larry,
What is a man?
Do you need anything more than “a man is an adult male” to answer that question?wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 14:51 last edited by@Axtremus said in What is a woman?:
Hey @Larry,
What is a man?
Do you need anything more than “a man is an adult male” to answer that question?No. Because I'm not convinced you're a male.
-
@Axtremus said in What is a woman?:
Hey @Larry,
What is a man?
Do you need anything more than “a man is an adult male” to answer that question?No. Because I'm not convinced you're a male.
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 15:31 last edited by Axtremus@Larry said in What is a woman?:
@Axtremus said in What is a woman?:
Hey @Larry,
What is a man?
Do you need anything more than “a man is an adult male” to answer that question?No.
”No“ as in you do not need anything more than “a man is an adult male” to answer the question “what is a man,” is that right?
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
Good for Matt Walsh, but what the hell was that "writing" supposed to be? "Getta loada mah boi! Yah das RIGHT, das RIGHT!"
That's literally the emotional equivalent of what her words amounted to. She has nothing to add other than "get a load of Matt Walsh throwing straight fire!", which, what the fuck. This is journalism now?
Your missing part of the point. Consider the platform, the audience and current national zeitgeist.
No amount of context is going to inject any kind of value into what she wrote.
And now, this has morphed into a discussion of substance over style, which is what I thought when I posted it.
Care to comment now?
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 18:14 last edited by Aqua Letifer@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
Good for Matt Walsh, but what the hell was that "writing" supposed to be? "Getta loada mah boi! Yah das RIGHT, das RIGHT!"
That's literally the emotional equivalent of what her words amounted to. She has nothing to add other than "get a load of Matt Walsh throwing straight fire!", which, what the fuck. This is journalism now?
Your missing part of the point. Consider the platform, the audience and current national zeitgeist.
No amount of context is going to inject any kind of value into what she wrote.
And now, this has morphed into a discussion of substance over style, which is what I thought when I posted it.
Care to comment now?
That's what I'm saying: she has no substance. The guy in the actual interview does.
Moreover this kind of messaging is bad for the rest of us. It creates the impression that "see, lots of people are talking about this issue" when really it's one person promoting someone else's interview. It's masquerading as substance, which is the problem.
-
wrote on 20 Feb 2022, 19:10 last edited by
Disagree.
Millions watch 'ol Phil wax psychological. When he discusses a subject, many times it becomes dinner conversation.
-
wrote on 21 Feb 2022, 00:24 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in What is a woman?:
People have been successfully seduced by the so-called “scientific” justifications of “sex as a spectrum”. Combine this with general ignorance about definitions of sex (biologists base it on gamete size, lay people on chromosomes or gonads or secondary sex characteristics, all of which are more variable - there are XXY and intersex people, but there are no “intermediate” gametes)
No doubt that there is a very real and veeeerrrrysmall number of people genetically transgendered and allowances must and should be made for them.
The problem is that “TG” is not being diagnosed and defined by geneticists, but instead by essentially HS Guidance Counselors who promptly recommend Hormone Blockers and are basing their diagnosis on Gender Dysphoria which is a very different and generally misunderstood problem of it’s own.
I still think the ultimate problem has to do with the number of people with real and serious emotional and psychological issues that have gone into the psychiatric field, gotten their degrees, and then use their degrees and education to justify their own kinks.
-
wrote on 21 Feb 2022, 17:44 last edited by
"Matt Walsh, Daily Wire podcast host and best-selling children’s author, made an appearance on Dr. Phil that will reverberate across the country for quite some time."
For some reason, I am not sure this will reverberate across the country. Granted, I am be an outlier, but I
A. never heard of Matt Walsh
B. barely know who Dr. Phil is
C. never heard of this story except here on this forum board.He did bring up an interesting question however. I think that overall, I am pretty non-judgmental, but I think it is like jon said above, there may be a concrete definition or no definition at all. Depends on which side you fall to.
