What is a woman?
-
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
Good for Matt Walsh, but what the hell was that "writing" supposed to be? "Getta loada mah boi! Yah das RIGHT, das RIGHT!"
That's literally the emotional equivalent of what her words amounted to. She has nothing to add other than "get a load of Matt Walsh throwing straight fire!", which, what the fuck. This is journalism now?
Your missing part of the point. Consider the platform, the audience and current national zeitgeist.
No amount of context is going to inject any kind of value into what she wrote.
@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
Good for Matt Walsh, but what the hell was that "writing" supposed to be? "Getta loada mah boi! Yah das RIGHT, das RIGHT!"
That's literally the emotional equivalent of what her words amounted to. She has nothing to add other than "get a load of Matt Walsh throwing straight fire!", which, what the fuck. This is journalism now?
Your missing part of the point. Consider the platform, the audience and current national zeitgeist.
No amount of context is going to inject any kind of value into what she wrote.
And now, this has morphed into a discussion of substance over style, which is what I thought when I posted it.
Care to comment now?
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
Pretty much.
It's a simple, irrefutable answer to an uncomplicated biological question. Anything else is a bizarre social construct superimposed by people desperately seeking acceptance and validation.
Not to mention, being fucked up in the head.
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
It's a simple, irrefutable answer to an uncomplicated biological question. Anything else is a bizarre social construct superimposed by people desperately seeking acceptance and validation.
What is a bitch? A female dog, wolf, fox, or otter.
Next time you use “bitch” for anything else, know that its probably just you desperately seeking acceptance and validation using a bizarre social construct.
-
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
It's a simple, irrefutable answer to an uncomplicated biological question. Anything else is a bizarre social construct superimposed by people desperately seeking acceptance and validation.
What is a bitch? A female dog, wolf, fox, or otter.
Next time you use “bitch” for anything else, know that its probably just you desperately seeking acceptance and validation using a bizarre social construct.
@Axtremus said in What is a woman?:
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
It's a simple, irrefutable answer to an uncomplicated biological question. Anything else is a bizarre social construct superimposed by people desperately seeking acceptance and validation.
What is a bitch? A female dog, wolf, fox, or otter.
Next time you use “bitch” for anything else, know that its probably just you desperately seeking acceptance and validation using a bizarre social construct.
What's scary is that you actually believe you just made a point.
-
@Axtremus said in What is a woman?:
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
It's a simple, irrefutable answer to an uncomplicated biological question. Anything else is a bizarre social construct superimposed by people desperately seeking acceptance and validation.
What is a bitch? A female dog, wolf, fox, or otter.
Next time you use “bitch” for anything else, know that its probably just you desperately seeking acceptance and validation using a bizarre social construct.
What's scary is that you actually believe you just made a point.
@Larry said in What is a woman?:
@Axtremus said in What is a woman?:
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
It's a simple, irrefutable answer to an uncomplicated biological question. Anything else is a bizarre social construct superimposed by people desperately seeking acceptance and validation.
What is a bitch? A female dog, wolf, fox, or otter.
Next time you use “bitch” for anything else, know that its probably just you desperately seeking acceptance and validation using a bizarre social construct.
What's scary is that you actually believe you just made a point.
You, sir, are right.
-
Hey @Larry,
What is a man?
Do you need anything more than “a man is an adult male” to answer that question? -
@Axtremus said in What is a woman?:
Hey @Larry,
What is a man?
Do you need anything more than “a man is an adult male” to answer that question?No. Because I'm not convinced you're a male.
@Larry said in What is a woman?:
@Axtremus said in What is a woman?:
Hey @Larry,
What is a man?
Do you need anything more than “a man is an adult male” to answer that question?No.
”No“ as in you do not need anything more than “a man is an adult male” to answer the question “what is a man,” is that right?
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
Good for Matt Walsh, but what the hell was that "writing" supposed to be? "Getta loada mah boi! Yah das RIGHT, das RIGHT!"
That's literally the emotional equivalent of what her words amounted to. She has nothing to add other than "get a load of Matt Walsh throwing straight fire!", which, what the fuck. This is journalism now?
Your missing part of the point. Consider the platform, the audience and current national zeitgeist.
No amount of context is going to inject any kind of value into what she wrote.
And now, this has morphed into a discussion of substance over style, which is what I thought when I posted it.
Care to comment now?
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
@Aqua-Letifer said in What is a woman?:
Good for Matt Walsh, but what the hell was that "writing" supposed to be? "Getta loada mah boi! Yah das RIGHT, das RIGHT!"
That's literally the emotional equivalent of what her words amounted to. She has nothing to add other than "get a load of Matt Walsh throwing straight fire!", which, what the fuck. This is journalism now?
Your missing part of the point. Consider the platform, the audience and current national zeitgeist.
No amount of context is going to inject any kind of value into what she wrote.
And now, this has morphed into a discussion of substance over style, which is what I thought when I posted it.
Care to comment now?
That's what I'm saying: she has no substance. The guy in the actual interview does.
Moreover this kind of messaging is bad for the rest of us. It creates the impression that "see, lots of people are talking about this issue" when really it's one person promoting someone else's interview. It's masquerading as substance, which is the problem.
-
Disagree.
Millions watch 'ol Phil wax psychological. When he discusses a subject, many times it becomes dinner conversation.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
@jon-nyc said in What is a woman?:
People have been successfully seduced by the so-called “scientific” justifications of “sex as a spectrum”. Combine this with general ignorance about definitions of sex (biologists base it on gamete size, lay people on chromosomes or gonads or secondary sex characteristics, all of which are more variable - there are XXY and intersex people, but there are no “intermediate” gametes)
No doubt that there is a very real and veeeerrrrysmall number of people genetically transgendered and allowances must and should be made for them.
The problem is that “TG” is not being diagnosed and defined by geneticists, but instead by essentially HS Guidance Counselors who promptly recommend Hormone Blockers and are basing their diagnosis on Gender Dysphoria which is a very different and generally misunderstood problem of it’s own.
I still think the ultimate problem has to do with the number of people with real and serious emotional and psychological issues that have gone into the psychiatric field, gotten their degrees, and then use their degrees and education to justify their own kinks.
The Brad
-
"Matt Walsh, Daily Wire podcast host and best-selling children’s author, made an appearance on Dr. Phil that will reverberate across the country for quite some time."
For some reason, I am not sure this will reverberate across the country. Granted, I am be an outlier, but I
A. never heard of Matt Walsh
B. barely know who Dr. Phil is
C. never heard of this story except here on this forum board.He did bring up an interesting question however. I think that overall, I am pretty non-judgmental, but I think it is like jon said above, there may be a concrete definition or no definition at all. Depends on which side you fall to.
-
"Matt Walsh, Daily Wire podcast host and best-selling children’s author, made an appearance on Dr. Phil that will reverberate across the country for quite some time."
For some reason, I am not sure this will reverberate across the country. Granted, I am be an outlier, but I
A. never heard of Matt Walsh
B. barely know who Dr. Phil is
C. never heard of this story except here on this forum board.He did bring up an interesting question however. I think that overall, I am pretty non-judgmental, but I think it is like jon said above, there may be a concrete definition or no definition at all. Depends on which side you fall to.
@taiwan_girl said in What is a woman?:
"Matt Walsh, Daily Wire podcast host and best-selling children’s author, made an appearance on Dr. Phil that will reverberate across the country for quite some time."
For some reason, I am not sure this will reverberate across the country. Granted, I am be an outlier, but I
A. never heard of Matt Walsh
B. barely know who Dr. Phil is
C. never heard of this story except here on this forum board.He did bring up an interesting question however. I think that overall, I am pretty non-judgmental, but I think it is like jon said above, there may be a concrete definition or no definition at all. Depends on which side you fall to.
You may have never heard of Matt Walsh, but I guarantee 8/10 people on the street know who Dr. Phil is.
-
@jon-nyc said in What is a woman?:
People have been successfully seduced by the so-called “scientific” justifications of “sex as a spectrum”. Combine this with general ignorance about definitions of sex (biologists base it on gamete size, lay people on chromosomes or gonads or secondary sex characteristics, all of which are more variable - there are XXY and intersex people, but there are no “intermediate” gametes)
No doubt that there is a very real and veeeerrrrysmall number of people genetically transgendered and allowances must and should be made for them.
The problem is that “TG” is not being diagnosed and defined by geneticists, but instead by essentially HS Guidance Counselors who promptly recommend Hormone Blockers and are basing their diagnosis on Gender Dysphoria which is a very different and generally misunderstood problem of it’s own.
I still think the ultimate problem has to do with the number of people with real and serious emotional and psychological issues that have gone into the psychiatric field, gotten their degrees, and then use their degrees and education to justify their own kinks.
@LuFins-Dad said in What is a woman?:
@jon-nyc said in What is a woman?:
People have been successfully seduced by the so-called “scientific” justifications of “sex as a spectrum”. Combine this with general ignorance about definitions of sex (biologists base it on gamete size, lay people on chromosomes or gonads or secondary sex characteristics, all of which are more variable - there are XXY and intersex people, but there are no “intermediate” gametes)
No doubt that there is a very real and veeeerrrrysmall number of people genetically transgendered and allowances must and should be made for them.
The problem is that “TG” is not being diagnosed and defined by geneticists, but instead by essentially HS Guidance Counselors who promptly recommend Hormone Blockers and are basing their diagnosis on Gender Dysphoria which is a very different and generally misunderstood problem of it’s own.
I still think the ultimate problem has to do with the number of people with real and serious emotional and psychological issues that have gone into the psychiatric field, gotten their degrees, and then use their degrees and education to justify their own kinks.
Bingo!!!!
-
Disagree.
Millions watch 'ol Phil wax psychological. When he discusses a subject, many times it becomes dinner conversation.
@Jolly said in What is a woman?:
Disagree.
Millions watch 'ol Phil wax psychological. When he discusses a subject, many times it becomes dinner conversation.
That's different. Phil actually discusses a subject. The example above is just literally parroting the interview. There's nothing new. All you get from the writeup is exactly what you'd get from the video.
-
Combination of:
-
People don’t really buy it but don’t want to appear “transphobic”
-
People haven’t thought about it enough to spot the glaring contradictions
-
People have been successfully seduced by the so-called “scientific” justifications of “sex as a spectrum”. Combine this with general ignorance about definitions of sex (biologists base it on gamete size, lay people on chromosomes or gonads or secondary sex characteristics, all of which are more variable - there are XXY and intersex people, but there are no “intermediate” gametes)
@jon-nyc Combination of:
People don’t really buy it but don’t want to appear “transphobic”
People haven’t thought about it enough to spot the glaring contradictions . . . and etc.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^That's one answer. Another answer to Lufin's question is that it is what Stephen King once characterized as boolsheet.
-
