Let It Die?

[xenon]

Yeah - it's steadily inching up. But way down from its heyday. Good biz mgmt on their part.

But just "delivering the facts" is more of a commodity now than it was in the past.

[Aqua Letifer]

Wonder what's in "other."

[taiwan_girl]

@Aqua-Letifer Do New York Times license anything? I know some newspapers sell old copies to people that may want to remember a special date in history for example.

[Doctor Phibes]

@Aqua-Letifer said in Let It Die?:

Wonder what's in "other."

George Soros.

[Axtremus]

@Aqua-Letifer said in Let It Die?:

Wonder what's in "other."

Online, they charge subscription to crossword puzzles and games separately. Maybe that's part of "other."

[Jolly]

Could the NYT draw as many eyeballs without the fluff?

[Axtremus]

@Jolly said in Let It Die?:

Could the NYT draw as many eyeballs without the fluff?

Can FoxNews draw as many eyeballs without the crazies?
Can the GOP win as many seats without gerrymandering?
Can Trump get as much attention without the stupid?
Mysteries!

[Mik]

There is still a lot to like in the NYT that you won't get in other papers. You just have to get past the front page.

[Jolly]

@Axtremus said in Let It Die?:

@Jolly said in Let It Die?:

Could the NYT draw as many eyeballs without the fluff?

Can FoxNews draw as many eyeballs without the crazies?
Can the GOP win as many seats without gerrymandering?
Can Trump get as much attention without the stupid?
Mysteries!

In other words, you don't have a clue.

[Aqua Letifer]

@Jolly said in Let It Die?:

Could the NYT draw as many eyeballs without the fluff?

No. The fluff brings in the money you need to do actual journalism, at a ratio of about 1:10: for every ten stories of crap, you can do something decent. A big problem is social media. Folks sharing links on Facebook, Twitter, and hell, even here, is a huge driving factor in the increase in subscriptions.

A very certain kind of story does well on social media. And it's not journalism.