Gain of Function
-
wrote on 11 Jan 2022, 15:09 last edited by
We're only in year 2 of 5 to unravel this shit.
At which point, Biden will simply say, "at this point, what difference does it make?"
-
We're only in year 2 of 5 to unravel this shit.
At which point, Biden will simply say, "at this point, what difference does it make?"
wrote on 11 Jan 2022, 15:12 last edited by@improviso said in Gain of Function:
At which point, Biden will simply say, "at this point, what difference does it make?"
Maybe he'll say they were very good people, too.
-
@improviso said in Gain of Function:
At which point, Biden will simply say, "at this point, what difference does it make?"
Maybe he'll say they were very good people, too.
wrote on 11 Jan 2022, 15:36 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in Gain of Function:
Maybe he'll say they were very good people, too.
He probably would. He lied about it in the past, after all.
-
@doctor-phibes said in Gain of Function:
Maybe he'll say they were very good people, too.
He probably would. He lied about it in the past, after all.
wrote on 11 Jan 2022, 15:41 last edited by Doctor Phibes 1 Nov 2022, 15:49@george-k said in Gain of Function:
@doctor-phibes said in Gain of Function:
Maybe he'll say they were very good people, too.
He probably would. He lied about it in the past, after all.
My point was that the 'At this point, what difference does it make' is something that is taken out of context, just as Trump's statement was.
For some inexplicable reason, many folks only seem to get upset about one of those pieces of dishonesty.
-
wrote on 12 Jan 2022, 00:01 last edited by
Fauci responds:
Link to video -
wrote on 12 Jan 2022, 02:47 last edited by
Well, PJ has been blacklisted on Twitter, or so I was told. Don't know fer shur.
-
wrote on 12 Jan 2022, 12:20 last edited by
It also mentions ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
I give it 85% chance of being bull shit.
-
It also mentions ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
I give it 85% chance of being bull shit.
wrote on 12 Jan 2022, 12:39 last edited by Doctor Phibes 1 Dec 2022, 12:40@jon-nyc said in Gain of Function:
It also mentions ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
I give it 85% chance of being bull shit.
The use of English is what makes me suspicious. There's a lot of techno-babble in there, but then it says "The reasons why nonpharmaceutical interventions like masks and medical countermeasures like the mRNA vaccines do not work..." - it struck me that the use of 'like' was a bit informal. At least, it wouldn't make it through my tech review (I can get pretty pedantic). Also, the fact that they raise the two political hot potatoes of masks and vaccines as being ineffective was a bit weird.
-
It also mentions ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
I give it 85% chance of being bull shit.
wrote on 12 Jan 2022, 13:41 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Gain of Function:
It also mentions ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
I give it 85% chance of being bull shit.
Could be. But the stuff about the gain of function, written by a DARPA guy, is that BS as well? And this is written to the DoDIG.
Here's what EcoHealth proposed in 2018:
IOW - they were going to cripple the virus to prevent an outbreak...and then whoopsie.
-
wrote on 13 Jan 2022, 13:04 last edited by
-
wrote on 13 Jan 2022, 13:08 last edited by
Are we down to 50% bullshit now? Or less?
-
wrote on 13 Jan 2022, 14:20 last edited by
@jolly said in Gain of Function:
Are we down to 50% bullshit now? Or less?
https://theintercept.com/2022/01/12/covid-origins-fauci-redacted-emails/
-
wrote on 13 Jan 2022, 17:47 last edited by
Time for Fauxi to go.
Or ramrod the SOB for malfeasance and threaten to take that huge pension away.
-
wrote on 21 Sept 2022, 01:25 last edited by
-
wrote on 21 Sept 2022, 01:31 last edited by
Now we know.
-
wrote on 21 Sept 2022, 02:02 last edited by
Color me shocked.
Not.
We had a pretty good guess within 30 days.
