Pandemic of the vaccinated?

[Mik]

Yep. What I have always heard is it won't necessarily prevent infection but reduces the chance of severe disease.

[Copper]

@renauda said in Pandemic of the vaccinated?:

It stressed there were no guarantees the vaccine(s) would prevent infections although it would probably help prevent spread in the community.

That there were no guarantees was stressed

And simultaneously the guarantees were stressed

Either fact could be confirmed by saying "Mr. Trump".

[Renauda]

@copper

All that can be confirmed is that Mr. Copper makes no sense in his post.

[Copper]

@renauda said in Pandemic of the vaccinated?:

@copper

All that can be confirmed is that Mr. Copper makes no sense in his post.

Yes, it is crazy, isn't it?

Some people say one thing, and other people say something completely different.

[Renauda]

@copper

I do not know what Trump has to do with the messaging around C19 vaccines in Canada or outside the USA. If you care to make that connection for me, there may be a chance I will be able to make sense of your post.

In the meantime however, I will not hold my breath for a coherent explanation. I doubt such exists.

[LuFins Dad]

@jon-nyc said in Pandemic of the vaccinated?:

If everyone is vaccinated then 100% of the cases will be breakthrough cases. This is not a measure of vaccine efficacy like the anti-vaxxers want you to believe.

That would be an effective argument if there weren’t 1) a significantly large cohort of unvaxxed (there is) and 2) the overall number of cases were reducing (they aren’t).

Initially there was a push on the vaccines preventing spread in official pressers then they shifted to effectiveness against severe COVID. However, the entire push for vaccine mandates has been about preventing spread and that unvaxxed individuals are a danger to their Aunt Agnes and everyone around them.

[Aqua Letifer]

@lufins-dad said in Pandemic of the vaccinated?:

@jon-nyc said in Pandemic of the vaccinated?:

If everyone is vaccinated then 100% of the cases will be breakthrough cases. This is not a measure of vaccine efficacy like the anti-vaxxers want you to believe.

That would be an effective argument if there weren’t 1) a significantly large cohort of unvaxxed (there is) and 2) the overall number of cases were reducing (they aren’t).

Initially there was a push on the vaccines preventing spread in official pressers then they shifted to effectiveness against severe COVID.

They "changed their minds" about this because variants initially were not very effective in causing breakthrough cases. Then they were, and very much so.

The pandemic keeps changing. That's why the recommended practices do.

And then there are the policy assholes who now have to develop rules for not only the biggest change in our day-to-day in living history, but one that didn't exist two years ago.

There are going to be many policy screw-ups. Very few of these people are rubbing their hands together, laughing to themselves in their basements. Most of them are just incompetent.

[LuFins Dad]

@aqua-letifer said in Pandemic of the vaccinated?:

Very few of these people are rubbing their hands together, laughing to themselves in their basements. Most of them are just incompetent.

Yes? I've never said that these people are maniacal geniuses with evil plots. I think most of them are well-intentioned incompetents. That doesn't make their decisions any less damaging.

[taiwan_girl]

@mik said in Pandemic of the vaccinated?:

Yep. What I have always heard is it won't necessarily prevent infection but reduces the chance of severe disease.

This was always the message I have been hearing, even from the beginning before vaccines.

It was always "flatten the curve", keep hospitals from overwhelming, etc.

[Jolly]

Mr. Biden told me otherwise.