Simple question about Potter

[kluurs]

Potter's immediate reaction post shooting....

This does not appear to be the reaction of someone who intended to shoot someone.

[Doctor Phibes]

I'd be very, very surprised if this was intentional.

[Horace]

@doctor-phibes said in Simple question about Potter:

I'd be very, very surprised if this was intentional.

The only intentional part is the leftist framing as systemic white supremacy. Unity! They're all about unity, just ask them.

[Doctor Phibes]

@horace said in Simple question about Potter:

@doctor-phibes said in Simple question about Potter:

I'd be very, very surprised if this was intentional.

The only intentional part is the leftist framing as systemic white supremacy. Unity! They're all about unity, just ask them.

I'm a bit of a leftie. I believe very little of the shit that I'm frequently told that I should believe as a leftie.

So maybe I'm not leftie. But I am. I'm just not a freaking nutjob.

[89th]

@doctor-phibes said in Simple question about Potter:

So maybe I'm not leftie. But I am. I'm just not a freaking nutjob.

You’re a leftie. Just as I’m a rightie. Except we both fall within one standard deviation of the good old bell curve. The media covers 3+ sigma.

[Mik]

I would never vote to convict on this one. This kid made his own bed. When you fight with police the outcome is never good.

[George K]

COUNT I – Charge: First-Degree Manslaughter Predicated on Reckless Use/Handling of a Firearm - Guilty

COUNT II – Charge: Second-Degree Manslaughter - Guilty

[Mik]

That’s a shame. It’s going to be increasingly difficult to recruit police officers of any quality.

[LuFins Dad]

@george-k said in Simple question about Potter:

COUNT I – Charge: First-Degree Manslaughter Predicated on Reckless Use/Handling of a Firearm - Guilty

COUNT II – Charge: Second-Degree Manslaughter - Guilty

The bad part? If she had intentionally discharged her pistol and just stated that he was a threat and the car was a deadly weapon then she walks. She's not going to jail because the dude's dead. She's going to jail because she was not well enough equipped to make that call in that position.

[George K]

According to NY Times:

The standard sentence range for the more serious charge, first-degree manslaughter, is between about six to eight and a half years in prison, and the maximum penalty is 15 years.

[Mik]

But what was the proximate cause of his death? His own actions.

[George K]

From the RWEC:

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Earlier today, to my disappointment, a Hennepin County jury convicted former police officer Kim Potter of both first degree and second degree manslaughter in the shooting death of hard-core criminal Daunte Wright. The facts of the case were never in dispute: police officers tried to arrest Wright on an outstanding warrant for a weapons charge, and he attempted to flee in his vehicle. As Wright was starting to get away, Potter meant to tase him, but under the pressure of the moment she drew her gun instead of her taser and fired once, killing Wright. Videos at the scene show that she was horrified and distraught at her mistake. The evidence at trial added little or nothing to what has always been clear.

In my opinion, the verdicts are wrong and should be reversed on appeal. The first degree manslaughter count requires that Potter caused another’s death “in committing or attempting to commit a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor offense with such force and violence that death of or great bodily harm to any person was reasonably foreseeable…” But Potter was not committing or attempting to commit a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor, she was executing a lawful arrest of a criminal. There was a similar issue in the Derek Chauvin case.

Further, she did not act with “such force or violence” that death or great bodily harm was foreseeable. On the contrary, what was foreseeable to her when she tried to pull her taser was minor injury at worst.

The second degree manslaughter charge requires that death be caused “by the person’s culpable negligence whereby the person creates an unreasonable risk, and consciously takes chances of causing death or great bodily harm to another.” There was no evidence that Potter “consciously” took the chance of “causing death” to Daunte Wright. Consciously, she was trying to use her taser, which would not have killed or seriously injured Wright.

In my opinion, Attorney General Keith Ellison should not have brought these charges against Potter, and Judge Regina Chu should not have submitted them to the jury. Will Potter’s conviction be reversed on appeal? It should be, but I don’t think anyone holds out much hope that Minnesota’s appellate courts have that kind of courage. The lynch mob atmosphere that prevailed in the Chauvin trial was more muted here, but I assume there would be riots if an appellate court did the right thing.

In recent times, two criminal defendants have had the book thrown at them in Minnesota: Derek Chauvin and Kim Potter. In general, Minnesota is a lenient state–one could almost say, a pro-criminal state. But Chauvin and Potter not only were overcharged (in Chauvin’s case, I don’t think his actions had anything to do with George Floyd’s death from a fentanyl overdose), the prosecution also was taken over by the Attorney General’s office, and the full resources of the state were brought to bear to ensure that convictions would be obtained in an atmosphere of threatened mob violence.

Here in Minnesota, we will be living with the consequences of these actions for a long time. At a minimum, it is hard to see who will want to be a police officer here. Not surprisingly, recruitment has dropped off precipitously. And the perceived alliance between Minnesota’s Attorney General’s office and the world of criminal gangs and drug addicts does not engender faith in law enforcement, to put it mildly.

[Jolly]

Would any of us now strap on a badge and gun in Wisconsin? Or encourage one of our children to do so?

[George K]

@jolly said in Simple question about Potter:

Would any of us now strap on a badge and gun in Wisconsin? Or encourage one of our children to do so?

This was Minnesooota, but your point stands.

[Jolly]

Sorry. It's early, I'm still working on my first cup, Christmas music is blaring in the kitchen and all damnyankees look alike to me...

[89th]

@jolly said in Simple question about Potter:

Would any of us now strap on a badge and gun in Wisconsin? Or encourage one of our children to do so?

I believe I've mentioned before, someone very close to me is in law enforcement in WI. Has been for 20 years. They are getting out of it as we speak, tired of what they see and hear all the time on the job.

[89th]

@mik said in Simple question about Potter:

That’s a shame. It’s going to be increasingly difficult to recruit police officers of any quality.

Totally.

Also, the way the jury asked about hung jury rules... then a day or two later have a guilty verdict implies they just wanted to get home for Christmas (since they were sequestered).

[LuFins Dad]

I’m sorry, but if there were ever a textbook definition of criminal incompetence, then this is it. She might have been a stellar officer in other respects, but this was really frigging bad. I think the charges were too high, but if we all agree that the truck driver in Colorado deserves to do a little time, how can she not? I’m not saying the charges are appropriate, but go to jail? Yes.

[89th]

@lufins-dad I said earlier I thought this was textbook involuntary manslaughter (at the worst) or at best a reason she should lose her job. But 1st/2nd degree manslaughter was an over-prosecution, IMO.

[Jolly]

Elephant in the room: Don't shape the Tazer like a firearm and vice versa.