Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars

Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
38 Posts 12 Posters 490 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CopperC Copper

    I think there is a big difference between drunk driving and doing harm while drunk driving.

    This will be another debate about slippery slopes.

    What other impairment will be allowed or not allowed?

    How about driving while stupid?

    bachophileB Offline
    bachophileB Offline
    bachophile
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @copper would you clarify that please? I see no difference at all.

    It’s like an eyesight requirement. Is there a difference between driving blind and driving blind and causing harm?

    Yes stupidity is also an impairment but can’t be quantified easily.

    Again personal freedoms? I can drive drunk if I promise not to hit anyone?

    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Away
      MikM Away
      Mik
      wrote on last edited by Mik
      #4

      There are situations that need to be addressed...how about the guy taking his wife to the hospital with a baby on the way? Hs driving could be a bit erratic, and stopping their car could be catastrophic.

      With BAC detection, what if a passenger is quite drunk? How will it distinguish between driver and passenger?

      A potentially good idea but with potential for harm. That it is proportionally less harm will be no comfort to those who are affected.

      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

      1 Reply Last reply
      • CopperC Offline
        CopperC Offline
        Copper
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Minority Report is a 2002 American science fiction action film[5] directed by Steven Spielberg, starring Tom Cruise, and loosely based on the 1956 short story "The Minority Report" by Philip K. Dick. The picture is set in Washington, D.C. and Northern Virginia in the year 2054, where Precrime, a specialized police department, apprehends criminals based on foreknowledge provided by three psychics called "precogs". The cast includes Cruise as John Anderton, Colin Farrell as agent Danny Witwer, Samantha Morton as Agatha, and Max von Sydow as Lamar Burgess.

        Link to video

        1 Reply Last reply
        • LuFins DadL Offline
          LuFins DadL Offline
          LuFins Dad
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          It comes down to one simple premise. The more involved the US Government is in your daily life, the worse off you are. This is government overreach.

          The Brad

          Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
          • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

            It comes down to one simple premise. The more involved the US Government is in your daily life, the worse off you are. This is government overreach.

            Aqua LetiferA Offline
            Aqua LetiferA Offline
            Aqua Letifer
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

            It comes down to one simple premise. The more involved the US Government is in your daily life, the worse off you are.

            Until you need something.

            Please love yourself.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor Phibes
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              You chaps do realise it's already illegal to drive over the limit, right?

              If they catch you now, you're fucked, and what's more you deserve to be. I know people who've suffered life changing injuries due to a drunk driver, and the driver thought he was absolutely fine.

              I was only joking

              LuFins DadL RenaudaR 2 Replies Last reply
              • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                You chaps do realise it's already illegal to drive over the limit, right?

                If they catch you now, you're fucked, and what's more you deserve to be. I know people who've suffered life changing injuries due to a drunk driver, and the driver thought he was absolutely fine.

                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                @doctor-phibes said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                You chaps do realise it's already illegal to drive over the limit, right?

                If they catch you now, you're fucked, and what's more you deserve to be. I know people who've suffered life changing injuries due to a drunk driver, and the driver thought he was absolutely fine.

                That’s not debatable. Personally, I would approve of stiffer penalties.

                The Brad

                1 Reply Last reply
                • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                  You chaps do realise it's already illegal to drive over the limit, right?

                  If they catch you now, you're fucked, and what's more you deserve to be. I know people who've suffered life changing injuries due to a drunk driver, and the driver thought he was absolutely fine.

                  RenaudaR Offline
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  @doctor-phibes said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                  You chaps do realise it's already illegal to drive over the limit, right?

                  A minor detail. Probably not to be taken seriously when personal civil liberties are involved.

                  Elbows up!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    It's a simple choice, really.

                    Freedom vs. safety.

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    Doctor PhibesD taiwan_girlT RenaudaR 3 Replies Last reply
                    • JollyJ Jolly

                      It's a simple choice, really.

                      Freedom vs. safety.

                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @jolly said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                      It's a simple choice, really.

                      Freedom vs. safety.

                      The thing about impaired driving is that you're affecting other people's safety as well as your own. Your claim to freedom ends when you adversely affect my children's safety.

                      I was only joking

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • MikM Away
                        MikM Away
                        Mik
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        It’s really not freedom vs safety. It’s rights vs responsibilities.

                        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor Phibes
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          I remember a few years back a drunk driver sued the bar that served him after he got injured after falling off his stupid motorbike. What a cock.

                          I was only joking

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins Dad
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

                            Do any of your cars have lane departure mitigation? Our new Honda does. It’s a feature that I had to turn off because I naturally end to hug the center line. Not cross the line, but run within 2-3 feet. Where I grew up we had very narrow road lanes due to the terrain. With the lane departure mitigation on, it is always trying to correct me. According to the technology they are citing in the article, I would be pulled over and shut down. Screw that.

                            Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

                            The Brad

                            CopperC Doctor PhibesD RenaudaR 3 Replies Last reply
                            • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                              Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

                              Do any of your cars have lane departure mitigation? Our new Honda does. It’s a feature that I had to turn off because I naturally end to hug the center line. Not cross the line, but run within 2-3 feet. Where I grew up we had very narrow road lanes due to the terrain. With the lane departure mitigation on, it is always trying to correct me. According to the technology they are citing in the article, I would be pulled over and shut down. Screw that.

                              Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

                              CopperC Offline
                              CopperC Offline
                              Copper
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                              Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

                              Great ideas, thanks

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

                                Do any of your cars have lane departure mitigation? Our new Honda does. It’s a feature that I had to turn off because I naturally end to hug the center line. Not cross the line, but run within 2-3 feet. Where I grew up we had very narrow road lanes due to the terrain. With the lane departure mitigation on, it is always trying to correct me. According to the technology they are citing in the article, I would be pulled over and shut down. Screw that.

                                Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

                                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                Doctor Phibes
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

                                Do any of your cars have lane departure mitigation? Our new Honda does. It’s a feature that I had to turn off because I naturally end to hug the center line. Not cross the line, but run within 2-3 feet. Where I grew up we had very narrow road lanes due to the terrain. With the lane departure mitigation on, it is always trying to correct me. According to the technology they are citing in the article, I would be pulled over and shut down. Screw that.

                                Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

                                There's been an ever increasing level of safety legislation in cars over the last few decades, and if you look at the death rates, it's worked. I'd be willing to bet that there was resistance to almost every improvement from some quarters.

                                325547b9-eb13-4125-b930-2656ea9b68d4-image.png

                                I was only joking

                                LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                                • MikM Mik

                                  It’s really not freedom vs safety. It’s rights vs responsibilities.

                                  JollyJ Offline
                                  JollyJ Offline
                                  Jolly
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @mik said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                  It’s really not freedom vs safety. It’s rights vs responsibilities.

                                  Isn't that part of the equation?

                                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                                    @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                    Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

                                    Do any of your cars have lane departure mitigation? Our new Honda does. It’s a feature that I had to turn off because I naturally end to hug the center line. Not cross the line, but run within 2-3 feet. Where I grew up we had very narrow road lanes due to the terrain. With the lane departure mitigation on, it is always trying to correct me. According to the technology they are citing in the article, I would be pulled over and shut down. Screw that.

                                    Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

                                    There's been an ever increasing level of safety legislation in cars over the last few decades, and if you look at the death rates, it's worked. I'd be willing to bet that there was resistance to almost every improvement from some quarters.

                                    325547b9-eb13-4125-b930-2656ea9b68d4-image.png

                                    LuFins DadL Offline
                                    LuFins DadL Offline
                                    LuFins Dad
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @doctor-phibes said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                    @lufins-dad said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                    Read a little more about this. It’s absurd.

                                    Do any of your cars have lane departure mitigation? Our new Honda does. It’s a feature that I had to turn off because I naturally end to hug the center line. Not cross the line, but run within 2-3 feet. Where I grew up we had very narrow road lanes due to the terrain. With the lane departure mitigation on, it is always trying to correct me. According to the technology they are citing in the article, I would be pulled over and shut down. Screw that.

                                    Beyond that, why not set it up for other offenses? Driving 10 MPH over the speed limit? Pull it over and shut it down… Go through a stop sign? Shut it down… Run a yellow a little too late? Here’s your ticket… Would likely save more lives than the drunk driving mitigation….

                                    There's been an ever increasing level of safety legislation in cars over the last few decades, and if you look at the death rates, it's worked. I'd be willing to bet that there was resistance to almost every improvement from some quarters.

                                    325547b9-eb13-4125-b930-2656ea9b68d4-image.png

                                    I would say there is a massive difference between crumple zones, airbag standards, and child restraints vs. the car not liking how you are driving and pulling over…

                                    The Brad

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • JollyJ Jolly

                                      It's a simple choice, really.

                                      Freedom vs. safety.

                                      taiwan_girlT Offline
                                      taiwan_girlT Offline
                                      taiwan_girl
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      @jolly said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                      It's a simple choice, really.

                                      Freedom vs. safety.

                                      I agree. Again, you have to compromise to live in a civilized society.

                                      You want 100% personal freedom to do what you want? Check out Eritrea, or a country like that.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • JollyJ Jolly

                                        It's a simple choice, really.

                                        Freedom vs. safety.

                                        RenaudaR Offline
                                        RenaudaR Offline
                                        Renauda
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        @jolly said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                        It's a simple choice, really.

                                        Freedom vs. safety.

                                        Not exactly. Driving a motor vehicle on public roads is an earned privilege that comes with accountability. If you drink, don’t drive.

                                        Elbows up!

                                        LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • RenaudaR Renauda

                                          @jolly said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                          It's a simple choice, really.

                                          Freedom vs. safety.

                                          Not exactly. Driving a motor vehicle on public roads is an earned privilege that comes with accountability. If you drink, don’t drive.

                                          LuFins DadL Offline
                                          LuFins DadL Offline
                                          LuFins Dad
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          @renauda said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                          @jolly said in Drunk Drive Sensors To Be Required in US Cars:

                                          It's a simple choice, really.

                                          Freedom vs. safety.

                                          Not exactly. Driving a motor vehicle on public roads is an earned privilege that comes with accountability. If you drink, don’t drive.

                                          I agree. What I don’t agree with is the assumption of guilt that must be disproven to be allowed to drive.

                                          The Brad

                                          RenaudaR KlausK 2 Replies Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups