Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Dersh Speaks

Dersh Speaks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
6 Posts 3 Posters 64 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by Jolly
    #1

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/dershowitz-spread-the-justice-in-flynn-case-but-restrain-the-judge/ar-bb1489xcocid=spartanntp

    Interesting. This was a straight copy/paste. Went back, did it again and it still didn't work. I'll hunt up the original.

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Bad link...

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by Jolly
        #3

        https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/497927-dershowitz-spread-the-justice-in-flynn-case-but-restrain-the-judge

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girl
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          President Trump Faces Uphill Legal Battle - Dershowitz on Newsmax

          Legal expert Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax TV on Thursday that President Donald Trump’s campaign is relying on legal challenges that “rarely succeed in court,” in several states that are key to his winning reelection.

          Dershowitz told “John Bachman Now” that although the Trump campaign has a “plausible” legal argument in Pennsylvania over whether the courts have the authority to extend the deadline for counting ballots that arrive after Election Day, their arguments in Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia “seem [like] more routine challenges to voter fraud that rarely succeed in court.”

          1 Reply Last reply
          • George KG Offline
            George KG Offline
            George K
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Andy McCarthy had a related analysis.

            To get the courts to recognize this it's a really high hurdle. To succeed you have to prove

            1. Fraud occurred (presumably a relatively easy thing to do)
            2. Prove that the outcome would be altered by the elimination of those fradulent votes. That's a LOT more difficult.

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG George K

              Andy McCarthy had a related analysis.

              To get the courts to recognize this it's a really high hurdle. To succeed you have to prove

              1. Fraud occurred (presumably a relatively easy thing to do)
              2. Prove that the outcome would be altered by the elimination of those fradulent votes. That's a LOT more difficult.
              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @George-K said in Dersh Speaks:

              Andy McCarthy had a related analysis.

              To get the courts to recognize this it's a really high hurdle. To succeed you have to prove

              1. Fraud occurred (presumably a relatively easy thing to do)
              2. Prove that the outcome would be altered by the elimination of those fradulent votes. That's a LOT more difficult.

              Ted Cruz said much the same thing.

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Groups