Dersh Speaks
-
wrote on 15 May 2020, 23:57 last edited by Jolly
Interesting. This was a straight copy/paste. Went back, did it again and it still didn't work. I'll hunt up the original.
-
wrote on 16 May 2020, 01:25 last edited by
Bad link...
-
wrote on 13 Nov 2020, 01:44 last edited by
President Trump Faces Uphill Legal Battle - Dershowitz on Newsmax
Legal expert Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax TV on Thursday that President Donald Trump’s campaign is relying on legal challenges that “rarely succeed in court,” in several states that are key to his winning reelection.
Dershowitz told “John Bachman Now” that although the Trump campaign has a “plausible” legal argument in Pennsylvania over whether the courts have the authority to extend the deadline for counting ballots that arrive after Election Day, their arguments in Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia “seem [like] more routine challenges to voter fraud that rarely succeed in court.”
-
wrote on 13 Nov 2020, 01:59 last edited by
Andy McCarthy had a related analysis.
To get the courts to recognize this it's a really high hurdle. To succeed you have to prove
- Fraud occurred (presumably a relatively easy thing to do)
- Prove that the outcome would be altered by the elimination of those fradulent votes. That's a LOT more difficult.
-
Andy McCarthy had a related analysis.
To get the courts to recognize this it's a really high hurdle. To succeed you have to prove
- Fraud occurred (presumably a relatively easy thing to do)
- Prove that the outcome would be altered by the elimination of those fradulent votes. That's a LOT more difficult.
wrote on 13 Nov 2020, 01:59 last edited by@George-K said in Dersh Speaks:
Andy McCarthy had a related analysis.
To get the courts to recognize this it's a really high hurdle. To succeed you have to prove
- Fraud occurred (presumably a relatively easy thing to do)
- Prove that the outcome would be altered by the elimination of those fradulent votes. That's a LOT more difficult.
Ted Cruz said much the same thing.