Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. A disturbing trend? Or not?

A disturbing trend? Or not?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
9 Posts 7 Posters 105 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    https://usafacts.org/articles/the-us-child-population-shrank-by-1-million-between-2010-and-2020/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=Oct-11-hispanic-heritage-month&utm_id=MailChimp

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • CopperC Offline
      CopperC Offline
      Copper
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Fewer Californians is probably good.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Well, they are one of the leading states for abortions...

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • AxtremusA Offline
          AxtremusA Offline
          Axtremus
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Why do we want the size of the (younger) population to grow or at least remain stable? Just take in more immigrants until robotics and artificial intelligence catch up, and your Social Security and Medicare will be fine.

          JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • AxtremusA Axtremus

            Why do we want the size of the (younger) population to grow or at least remain stable? Just take in more immigrants until robotics and artificial intelligence catch up, and your Social Security and Medicare will be fine.

            JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @axtremus said in A disturbing trend? Or not?:

            Why do we want the size of the (younger) population to grow or at least remain stable? Just take in more immigrants until robotics and artificial intelligence catch up, and your Social Security and Medicare will be fine.

            Go back to your sex doll...

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • X Offline
              X Offline
              xenon
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I'm curious where the decrease is coming from.

              Affluent families tend to still be 2-parent. The single-parent rate is coming from working class families.

              Do people from those 2-parent families still have kids at a similar rate as the generation before? Who is having fewer kids and why?

              It's really tough to answer if this is disturbing. If you're part of a family and generally happy (like me), feels a bit disturbing. But, if you're a childless, happy dude you may see nothing wrong with this at all.

              taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
              • HoraceH Offline
                HoraceH Offline
                Horace
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                More financial freedom appears to be correlated with fewer children. That would check out for those of us who understand that children, historically, were free and necessary labor as well as an existential risk to the mother.

                Education is extremely important.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • X xenon

                  I'm curious where the decrease is coming from.

                  Affluent families tend to still be 2-parent. The single-parent rate is coming from working class families.

                  Do people from those 2-parent families still have kids at a similar rate as the generation before? Who is having fewer kids and why?

                  It's really tough to answer if this is disturbing. If you're part of a family and generally happy (like me), feels a bit disturbing. But, if you're a childless, happy dude you may see nothing wrong with this at all.

                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girl
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @xenon said in A disturbing trend? Or not?:

                  I'm curious where the decrease is coming from.

                  Affluent families tend to still be 2-parent. The single-parent rate is coming from working class families.

                  Do people from those 2-parent families still have kids at a similar rate as the generation before? Who is having fewer kids and why?

                  It's really tough to answer if this is disturbing. If you're part of a family and generally happy (like me), feels a bit disturbing. But, if you're a childless, happy dude you may see nothing wrong with this at all.

                  I think worldwide, education and more economy = less kids

                  It seems somewhat opposite that richer people would have less kids than poor people, but that is the way it goes, not only in the US.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • LarryL Offline
                    LarryL Offline
                    Larry
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    I guess if you can't afford a trip to Didneyland, just stay home and screw the old lady.....

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups