Losing loser loses again
-
wrote on 24 Sept 2021, 20:14 last edited by xenon
It's rigged all the way down. Any "evidence" that shows it wasn't rigged is just evidence of how deep the swamp is.
-
wrote on 24 Sept 2021, 23:48 last edited by
-
wrote on 25 Sept 2021, 15:02 last edited by
That's just Maricopa County.
There are two issues...
- If you threw out all the dupes, improper votes counted, etc., would DJT have a shot at winning the state. Don't take Pravda's word for it, glance over the numbers.
- Even if Biden would have won handily, this many fuck-ups brings the ballot integrity question to the forefront. Want elections not to contested or people to not think the system is rigged? Then make the system clear, transparent and uncheatable. If not, bad things happen in countries where the populance has no faith in the election process.
-
That's just Maricopa County.
There are two issues...
- If you threw out all the dupes, improper votes counted, etc., would DJT have a shot at winning the state. Don't take Pravda's word for it, glance over the numbers.
- Even if Biden would have won handily, this many fuck-ups brings the ballot integrity question to the forefront. Want elections not to contested or people to not think the system is rigged? Then make the system clear, transparent and uncheatable. If not, bad things happen in countries where the populance has no faith in the election process.
wrote on 25 Sept 2021, 17:42 last edited by@jolly said in Losing loser loses again:
That's just Maricopa County.
There are two issues...
- If you threw out all the dupes, improper votes counted, etc., would DJT have a shot at winning the state. Don't take Pravda's word for it, glance over the numbers.
That appears to assume that all the mistakes were made in Biden's favour. I haven't seen anything to support that.
-
@jolly said in Losing loser loses again:
That's just Maricopa County.
There are two issues...
- If you threw out all the dupes, improper votes counted, etc., would DJT have a shot at winning the state. Don't take Pravda's word for it, glance over the numbers.
That appears to assume that all the mistakes were made in Biden's favour. I haven't seen anything to support that.
wrote on 25 Sept 2021, 17:45 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in Losing loser loses again:
That appears to assume that all the mistakes were made in Biden's favour. I haven't seen anything to support that.
No. Biden won Arizona by 10,457 votes.
You have 42,727 questionable votes.
-
@jolly said in Losing loser loses again:
That's just Maricopa County.
There are two issues...
- If you threw out all the dupes, improper votes counted, etc., would DJT have a shot at winning the state. Don't take Pravda's word for it, glance over the numbers.
That appears to assume that all the mistakes were made in Biden's favour. I haven't seen anything to support that.
wrote on 25 Sept 2021, 17:49 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in Losing loser loses again:
@jolly said in Losing loser loses again:
That's just Maricopa County.
There are two issues...
- If you threw out all the dupes, improper votes counted, etc., would DJT have a shot at winning the state. Don't take Pravda's word for it, glance over the numbers.
That appears to assume that all the mistakes were made in Biden's favour. I haven't seen anything to support that.
Let's assume they were all made in Trump's favor. I'm more concerned that they had this many problems.
And I wonder how many other states have similar problems?
-
@doctor-phibes said in Losing loser loses again:
That appears to assume that all the mistakes were made in Biden's favour. I haven't seen anything to support that.
No. Biden won Arizona by 10,457 votes.
You have 42,727 questionable votes.
wrote on 25 Sept 2021, 20:41 last edited by@george-k said in Losing loser loses again:
@doctor-phibes said in Losing loser loses again:
That appears to assume that all the mistakes were made in Biden's favour. I haven't seen anything to support that.
No. Biden won Arizona by 10,457 votes.
You have 42,727 questionable votes.
But if they're mistakes rather than fraud, you'd expect them to be roughly 50/50, and with a sample size of 42,727, it's very unlikely that the result would be changed.
I agree with Jolly that the system could clearly be improved.
-
@george-k said in Losing loser loses again:
@doctor-phibes said in Losing loser loses again:
That appears to assume that all the mistakes were made in Biden's favour. I haven't seen anything to support that.
No. Biden won Arizona by 10,457 votes.
You have 42,727 questionable votes.
But if they're mistakes rather than fraud, you'd expect them to be roughly 50/50, and with a sample size of 42,727, it's very unlikely that the result would be changed.
I agree with Jolly that the system could clearly be improved.
wrote on 25 Sept 2021, 20:44 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in Losing loser loses again:
But if they're mistakes rather than fraud
Biden voters make more mistakes
-
@george-k said in Losing loser loses again:
@doctor-phibes said in Losing loser loses again:
That appears to assume that all the mistakes were made in Biden's favour. I haven't seen anything to support that.
No. Biden won Arizona by 10,457 votes.
You have 42,727 questionable votes.
But if they're mistakes rather than fraud, you'd expect them to be roughly 50/50, and with a sample size of 42,727, it's very unlikely that the result would be changed.
I agree with Jolly that the system could clearly be improved.
wrote on 25 Sept 2021, 23:32 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in Losing loser loses again:
But if they're mistakes rather than fraud, you'd expect them to be roughly 50/50
True.
Voters who vote in multiple counties and more ballots returned than existing voters are not mistakes.
-
It's rigged all the way down. Any "evidence" that shows it wasn't rigged is just evidence of how deep the swamp is.
wrote on 29 Sept 2021, 14:23 last edited by@xenon said in Losing loser loses again:
It's rigged all the way down. Any "evidence" that shows it wasn't rigged is just evidence of how deep the swamp is.
LOL, even if Trump won Arizona, it would go from a landslide loss to a rock fall loss. But looks like Trump lost Arizona by even more than he thought, so what's one level above landslide?
-
@xenon said in Losing loser loses again:
It's rigged all the way down. Any "evidence" that shows it wasn't rigged is just evidence of how deep the swamp is.
LOL, even if Trump won Arizona, it would go from a landslide loss to a rock fall loss. But looks like Trump lost Arizona by even more than he thought, so what's one level above landslide?
wrote on 29 Sept 2021, 14:26 last edited by Doctor Phibes@89th said in Losing loser loses again:
But looks like Trump lost Arizona by even more than he thought, so what's one level above landslide?
That's such a massive loss it goes around the circle and becomes a cult-win, like those really awful movies some people enjoy.
Oh, sorry, did I say cult? Anyway, you know what I meant....
-
wrote on 29 Sept 2021, 15:25 last edited by
Just wait 'till next time!
-
wrote on 29 Sept 2021, 15:28 last edited by
@jolly said in Losing loser loses again:
Just wait 'till next time!
I don't think I'm ready to listen to four years of him going on about how unfair the 2-term limit is and/or how the Presidency really ought to be hereditary.
-
wrote on 29 Sept 2021, 15:31 last edited by
Better hurry up and get those citizenship papers, so you can vote!
-
wrote on 29 Sept 2021, 16:08 last edited by
@jolly said in Losing loser loses again:
Better hurry up and get those citizenship papers, so you can vote!
To keep Trump out in Massachusetts?
-
@jolly said in Losing loser loses again:
Better hurry up and get those citizenship papers, so you can vote!
To keep Trump out in Massachusetts?
wrote on 29 Sept 2021, 17:31 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in Losing loser loses again:
@jolly said in Losing loser loses again:
Better hurry up and get those citizenship papers, so you can vote!
To keep Trump out in Massachusetts?
I thought you might be voting for The Donald. Gotta love those lower taxes!
-
wrote on 29 Sept 2021, 18:13 last edited by
One more loss for Trump:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21071194-grant-v-trump-order-on-dismissal-motionTrump used a copyrighted song in campaign ad and refused to pay the rights holder for said use. The rights holder sued. Trump’s legal team moved to dismiss the case, but the judge denied the motion to dismiss. The case will go to discovery.
-
@doctor-phibes said in Losing loser loses again:
@jolly said in Losing loser loses again:
Better hurry up and get those citizenship papers, so you can vote!
To keep Trump out in Massachusetts?
I thought you might be voting for The Donald. Gotta love those lower taxes!
wrote on 29 Sept 2021, 18:16 last edited by Doctor Phibes@jolly said in Losing loser loses again:
Gotta love those lower taxes!
Not really bothered, TBH. What I've seen since I got here was debt, debt, and more debt. It doesn't seem to make much difference who's in charge, they have no concept of living within their means. Not being an American citizen means that I can choose to walk away from the debt at an appropriate point in my life if I wish, and inherit a slightly lower one somewhere else.
