Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!
-
And once again, America's Paper of Record has foretold the future.
By the way, the shoes she wore were $600.
wrote on 16 Sept 2021, 15:13 last edited by@george-k said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:
By the way, the shoes she wore were $600.
Congress women must make good tips.
-
wrote on 18 Sept 2021, 23:09 last edited by
-
wrote on 19 Sept 2021, 12:26 last edited by
-
wrote on 19 Sept 2021, 13:40 last edited by
Those poor girls must be embarrassed.
-
wrote on 19 Sept 2021, 14:01 last edited by
Not that I have any use for Aurora James, I totally don't, but hey, Frank, y'all need some support for those numbers. I don't know you. This is doubly true for anything published in the NY Post.
-
Not that I have any use for Aurora James, I totally don't, but hey, Frank, y'all need some support for those numbers. I don't know you. This is doubly true for anything published in the NY Post.
wrote on 19 Sept 2021, 14:37 last edited by@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:
Not that I have any use for Aurora James, I totally don't, but hey, Frank, y'all need some support for those numbers. I don't know you. This is doubly true for anything published in the NY Post.
https://portal.assessor.lacounty.gov/parceldetail/5564017012
https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-businessmen/business-executives/ben-bronfman-net-worth/
-
Not that I have any use for Aurora James, I totally don't, but hey, Frank, y'all need some support for those numbers. I don't know you. This is doubly true for anything published in the NY Post.
wrote on 19 Sept 2021, 21:27 last edited by@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:
Not that I have any use for Aurora James, I totally don't, but hey, Frank, y'all need some support for those numbers. I don't know you. This is doubly true for anything published in the NY Post.
@Catseye3 all of the supporting documents are linked in the article. May I ask for examples of why you think the MY Post is untrustworthy?
-
@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:
Not that I have any use for Aurora James, I totally don't, but hey, Frank, y'all need some support for those numbers. I don't know you. This is doubly true for anything published in the NY Post.
@Catseye3 all of the supporting documents are linked in the article. May I ask for examples of why you think the MY Post is untrustworthy?
wrote on 19 Sept 2021, 21:38 last edited by@lufins-dad It's a rag, IMO.
-
@lufins-dad It's a rag, IMO.
wrote on 19 Sept 2021, 21:54 last edited by@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:
It's a rag, IMO.
Which, of course, makes it dishonest.
iirc, Nat Enquirer, a rag by almost anyone's standard, derailed Gary Hart's presidential campaign.
You can be a despicable, but right...just look at me.
-
@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:
It's a rag, IMO.
Which, of course, makes it dishonest.
iirc, Nat Enquirer, a rag by almost anyone's standard, derailed Gary Hart's presidential campaign.
You can be a despicable, but right...just look at me.
wrote on 19 Sept 2021, 22:05 last edited by@george-k said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:
Which, of course, makes it dishonest.
No, but it makes it suspect.
I've held it in low esteem ever since they printed -- on the front page, no less -- a photo of the First Lady in the nude.
Despicable. If they'd do that for their circulation, they'd do anything.
-
@george-k said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:
Which, of course, makes it dishonest.
No, but it makes it suspect.
I've held it in low esteem ever since they printed -- on the front page, no less -- a photo of the First Lady in the nude.
Despicable. If they'd do that for their circulation, they'd do anything.
wrote on 19 Sept 2021, 22:27 last edited by George K@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:
No, but it makes it suspect.
Fair 'nuff.
The things they commented on are linked in the article - as I said.
DOn't let your distaste for the publication get in the way of facts.
-
wrote on 5 Nov 2021, 14:09 last edited by
