Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!

[George K]

And once again, America's Paper of Record has foretold the future.

By the way, the shoes she wore were $600.

[Copper]

@george-k said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

By the way, the shoes she wore were $600.

Congress women must make good tips.

[Copper]

[George K]

Full story here: https://nypost.com/2021/09/18/aocs-tax-the-rich-dress-designer-aurora-james-is-a-tax-deadbeat/

[Copper]

Those poor girls must be embarrassed.

[Catseye3]

Not that I have any use for Aurora James, I totally don't, but hey, Frank, y'all need some support for those numbers. I don't know you. This is doubly true for anything published in the NY Post.

[George K]

@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

Not that I have any use for Aurora James, I totally don't, but hey, Frank, y'all need some support for those numbers. I don't know you. This is doubly true for anything published in the NY Post.

https://appext20.dos.ny.gov/stwarrants_public/stw_warrants?p_name=CULTURAL+BROKERAGE+AGENCY+LLC&p_lapsed=0

https://portal.assessor.lacounty.gov/parceldetail/5564017012

https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-businessmen/business-executives/ben-bronfman-net-worth/

[LuFins Dad]

@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

Not that I have any use for Aurora James, I totally don't, but hey, Frank, y'all need some support for those numbers. I don't know you. This is doubly true for anything published in the NY Post.

@Catseye3 all of the supporting documents are linked in the article. May I ask for examples of why you think the MY Post is untrustworthy?

[Catseye3]

@lufins-dad It's a rag, IMO.

[George K]

@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

It's a rag, IMO.

Which, of course, makes it dishonest.

iirc, Nat Enquirer, a rag by almost anyone's standard, derailed Gary Hart's presidential campaign.

You can be a despicable, but right...just look at me.

[Catseye3]

@george-k said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

Which, of course, makes it dishonest.

No, but it makes it suspect.

I've held it in low esteem ever since they printed -- on the front page, no less -- a photo of the First Lady in the nude.

Despicable. If they'd do that for their circulation, they'd do anything.

[George K]

@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

No, but it makes it suspect.

Fair 'nuff.

The things they commented on are linked in the article - as I said.

DOn't let your distaste for the publication get in the way of facts.

[George K]