Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!

[Catseye3]

Thought some more about this. On behalf of the rightful attendees of the Met Gala, I am annoyed as hell by AOC's thrusting herself into their midst. Rich people have the right to play just like everyone else. They have the right to dress up and drift around in beautiful surroundings and enjoy themselves and each other. Why shouldn't they? They've earned it. AOC invading the party was an arrogant and abrasive act of contempt toward the other guests that they, for that evening, were entitled to not be subjected to. She had no right to be there. She belonged there like a cockroach in the cake icing.

She acted the saboteur. She showed no honor to her party or to her so-called principles. The one bright spot is that she demonstrated her ignorance in a powerful and conspicuous way.

But she had no right.

[Doctor Phibes]

@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

Thought some more about this. On behalf of the rightful attendees of the Met Gala, I am annoyed as hell by AOC's thrusting herself into their midst. Rich people have the right to play just like everyone else. They have the right to dress up and drift around in beautiful surroundings and enjoy themselves and each other. Why shouldn't they? They've earned it. AOC invading the party was an arrogant and abrasive act of contempt toward the other guests that they, for that evening, were entitled to not be subjected to. She had no right to be there. She belonged there like a cockroach in the cake icing.

You're honestly worried that she might have ruined Kim Kardashian's evening?

Personally, I think they deserve AOC.

[Catseye3]

@doctor-phibes said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

You're honestly worried that she might have ruined Kim Kardashian's evening?
Personally, I think they deserve AOC.

Nobody deserves either AOC or the Kardashian. But I wasn't thinking of the Kardashian contingent. More like the mover and producer types; the tycoons.

[George K]

And once again, America's Paper of Record has foretold the future.

By the way, the shoes she wore were $600.

[Copper]

@george-k said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

By the way, the shoes she wore were $600.

Congress women must make good tips.

[Copper]

@george-k said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:


[George K]

Full story here: https://nypost.com/2021/09/18/aocs-tax-the-rich-dress-designer-aurora-james-is-a-tax-deadbeat/

[Copper]

Those poor girls must be embarrassed.

[Catseye3]

Not that I have any use for Aurora James, I totally don't, but hey, Frank, y'all need some support for those numbers. I don't know you. This is doubly true for anything published in the NY Post.

[George K]

@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

Not that I have any use for Aurora James, I totally don't, but hey, Frank, y'all need some support for those numbers. I don't know you. This is doubly true for anything published in the NY Post.

https://appext20.dos.ny.gov/stwarrants_public/stw_warrants?p_name=CULTURAL+BROKERAGE+AGENCY+LLC&p_lapsed=0

https://portal.assessor.lacounty.gov/parceldetail/5564017012

https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-businessmen/business-executives/ben-bronfman-net-worth/

[LuFins Dad]

@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

Not that I have any use for Aurora James, I totally don't, but hey, Frank, y'all need some support for those numbers. I don't know you. This is doubly true for anything published in the NY Post.

@Catseye3 all of the supporting documents are linked in the article. May I ask for examples of why you think the MY Post is untrustworthy?

[Catseye3]

@lufins-dad It's a rag, IMO.

[George K]

@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

It's a rag, IMO.

Which, of course, makes it dishonest.

iirc, Nat Enquirer, a rag by almost anyone's standard, derailed Gary Hart's presidential campaign.

You can be a despicable, but right...just look at me.

[Catseye3]

@george-k said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

Which, of course, makes it dishonest.

No, but it makes it suspect.

I've held it in low esteem ever since they printed -- on the front page, no less -- a photo of the First Lady in the nude.

Despicable. If they'd do that for their circulation, they'd do anything.

[George K]

@catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!:

No, but it makes it suspect.

Fair 'nuff.

The things they commented on are linked in the article - as I said.

DOn't let your distaste for the publication get in the way of facts.

[George K]