Left Behind
-
@catseye3 said in Left Behind:
Item: Don't know about you, but I never heard of any organization named 'American Humane'.
One Google search that would've taken four seconds would've gotten you to American Humane (AH) is an organization founded in 1877, committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals.
They're the ones responsible for the "no animals were harmed" messages in movie credits.
Looking things up is helpful.
@aqua-letifer said in Left Behind:
Looking things up is helpful.
I figured it would be obvious that I meant I'd never heard of it before this story broke. But apparently not.
-
@aqua-letifer said in Left Behind:
Looking things up is helpful.
I figured it would be obvious that I meant I'd never heard of it before this story broke. But apparently not.
@catseye3 said in Left Behind:
@aqua-letifer said in Left Behind:
Looking things up is helpful.
I figured it would be obvious that I meant I'd never heard of it before this story broke. But apparently not.
Also, as to "who tortures dogs": feel free to conduct another Google search. Better yet, visit your local shelter and ask the volunteers why the animals are there and count the abuse cases. People do these things and no it's not weird to suggest such.
-
@catseye3 said in Left Behind:
@aqua-letifer said in Left Behind:
Looking things up is helpful.
I figured it would be obvious that I meant I'd never heard of it before this story broke. But apparently not.
Also, as to "who tortures dogs": feel free to conduct another Google search. Better yet, visit your local shelter and ask the volunteers why the animals are there and count the abuse cases. People do these things and no it's not weird to suggest such.
@aqua-letifer said in Left Behind:
Also, as to "who tortures dogs": feel free to conduct another Google search.
Yes. However, the incidence of various rando weirdos doing dog torture is probably a lot less than the incidence of dogs being killed because of some people's interpretation that Islam declares that dogs are unclean.
https://www.learnreligions.com/dogs-in-islam-2004392
Most Muslim scholars agree that in Islam the saliva of a dog is ritually impure and that objects (or perhaps persons) that come into contact with a dog's saliva require them to be washed seven times. This ruling comes from the hadith:
When the dog licks the utensil, wash it seven times, and rub it with earth the eighth time.
It is to be noted, however, that one of the major Islamic schools of thought (Maliki) indicates that this is not a matter of ritual cleanliness, but simply a common-sense method way to prevent the spread of disease.There are several other hadith, however, that warns of consequences for dog-owners:
"The Prophet, peace be upon him, said: 'Whoever keeps a dog, his good deeds will decrease every day by one qeeraat [a unit of measurement], unless it is a dog for farming or herding.' In another report, it is said: ' …unless it is a dog for herding sheep, farming or hunting.'"—Bukhari Sharif
"The Prophet, peace be upon him, said: 'Angels do not enter a house wherein there is a dog or an animate picture.'"—Bukhari Sharif
Many Muslims base the prohibition against keeping a dog in one's home, except for the case of working or service dogs, on these traditions."Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
Okay, point taken. I should have clarified that I couldn't see the point of Taliban going out of their way to torture dogs, in a war situation.
Now that you've gotten your shots off, I'll point out that neither of them addressed the main point. Which is: Somebody is either mistaken or lying. Either the AH prez or the Pentagon. She describes the dogs left behind as -- I forget the wording -- military contract working dogs, which if you believe the Pentagon they weren't, or the Pentagon is lying about having left the dogs. There's a discrepancy.
-
@aqua-letifer said in Left Behind:
Also, as to "who tortures dogs": feel free to conduct another Google search.
Yes. However, the incidence of various rando weirdos doing dog torture is probably a lot less than the incidence of dogs being killed because of some people's interpretation that Islam declares that dogs are unclean.
https://www.learnreligions.com/dogs-in-islam-2004392
Most Muslim scholars agree that in Islam the saliva of a dog is ritually impure and that objects (or perhaps persons) that come into contact with a dog's saliva require them to be washed seven times. This ruling comes from the hadith:
When the dog licks the utensil, wash it seven times, and rub it with earth the eighth time.
It is to be noted, however, that one of the major Islamic schools of thought (Maliki) indicates that this is not a matter of ritual cleanliness, but simply a common-sense method way to prevent the spread of disease.There are several other hadith, however, that warns of consequences for dog-owners:
"The Prophet, peace be upon him, said: 'Whoever keeps a dog, his good deeds will decrease every day by one qeeraat [a unit of measurement], unless it is a dog for farming or herding.' In another report, it is said: ' …unless it is a dog for herding sheep, farming or hunting.'"—Bukhari Sharif
"The Prophet, peace be upon him, said: 'Angels do not enter a house wherein there is a dog or an animate picture.'"—Bukhari Sharif
Many Muslims base the prohibition against keeping a dog in one's home, except for the case of working or service dogs, on these traditions.@george-k said in Left Behind:
Most Muslim scholars agree that in Islam the saliva of a dog is ritually impure and that objects (or perhaps persons) that come into contact with a dog's saliva require them to be washed seven times. This ruling comes from the hadith:
How many Muslim events have you been to?
I've been to none. But I have been to quite a few Christian church services, so I know the following is not a modern Christian practice, nor is it condoned at face value by anyone sane:
Whosoever ... hath any blemish, let him not approach to offer the bread of his God. For whatsoever man he be that hath a blemish, he shall not approach: a blind man, or a lame, or he that hath a flat nose, or any thing superfluous, Or a man that is brokenfooted, or brokenhanded, Or crookback, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or be scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken ... He shall not go in unto the vail, nor come nigh unto the altar, because he hath a blemish; that he profane not my sanctuaries.
I'm not willing to judge at face value these kinds of "Muslim teachings" without knowing more about the religion in practice, because I give Christianity the same latitude.
-
@george-k said in Left Behind:
Most Muslim scholars agree that in Islam the saliva of a dog is ritually impure and that objects (or perhaps persons) that come into contact with a dog's saliva require them to be washed seven times. This ruling comes from the hadith:
How many Muslim events have you been to?
I've been to none. But I have been to quite a few Christian church services, so I know the following is not a modern Christian practice, nor is it condoned at face value by anyone sane:
Whosoever ... hath any blemish, let him not approach to offer the bread of his God. For whatsoever man he be that hath a blemish, he shall not approach: a blind man, or a lame, or he that hath a flat nose, or any thing superfluous, Or a man that is brokenfooted, or brokenhanded, Or crookback, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or be scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken ... He shall not go in unto the vail, nor come nigh unto the altar, because he hath a blemish; that he profane not my sanctuaries.
I'm not willing to judge at face value these kinds of "Muslim teachings" without knowing more about the religion in practice, because I give Christianity the same latitude.
@aqua-letifer said in Left Behind:
How many Muslim events have you been to?
Wait...lemme think.
That would be zero.
But that's not the point. The correct question is this: "How many Muslims have you spoken to that consider dogs unclean?"
The answer to that is more than zero. In fact, it's more than 6.
I've been to none. But I have been to quite a few Christian church services, so I know the following is not a modern Christian practice, nor is it condoned at face value by anyone sane:
Well, yeah. "Sane" is an important word there. In this context it might even be equivalent to "more recent than the 8th century."
-
@aqua-letifer said in Left Behind:
How many Muslim events have you been to?
Wait...lemme think.
That would be zero.
But that's not the point. The correct question is this: "How many Muslims have you spoken to that consider dogs unclean?"
The answer to that is more than zero. In fact, it's more than 6.
I've been to none. But I have been to quite a few Christian church services, so I know the following is not a modern Christian practice, nor is it condoned at face value by anyone sane:
Well, yeah. "Sane" is an important word there. In this context it might even be equivalent to "more recent than the 8th century."
@george-k said in Left Behind:
But that's not the point. The correct question is this: "How many Muslims have you spoken to that consider dogs unclean?"
The answer to that is more than zero. In fact, it's more than 6.Mine's zero.
-
Out of the 6 that have visited me, 4 were cool with our dogs and 2 were aghast…
-
Be they service dogs or maybe just dogs that belonged to American citizens trying to get out of Afghanistan, what do you think the Taliban did with them? Took them home for their children to snuggle with?
Probably shot the legs off of them and left them to whimper and die in the street.
-
Years ago, I had a family of next door neighbors who were Muslims and kept dogs as pets. From what I could see, they treated their dogs pretty well too. :man-shrugging:
@axtremus said in Left Behind:
Years ago, I had a family of next door neighbors who were Muslims and kept dogs as pets. From what I could see, they treated their dogs pretty well too. :man-shrugging:
Good for them.
I doubt the Talibs would be as accommodating.
-
"Muslims" isn't the point. "Extremist Islamist fundamentalists" is the point.
Over and over people say this, as though all Muslims are the same, and the world is divided into Muslims and non-Muslims. Honestly, it's ridiculous. It leads to no end of bullshit and bigotry.
-
"Muslims" isn't the point. "Extremist Islamist fundamentalists" is the point.
Over and over people say this, as though all Muslims are the same, and the world is divided into Muslims and non-Muslims. Honestly, it's ridiculous. It leads to no end of bullshit and bigotry.
@doctor-phibes said in Left Behind:
"Muslims" isn't the point. "Extremist Islamist fundamentalists" is the point.
I know of at least two "non-extremist" Muslims who will not abide dogs.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@doctor-phibes said in Left Behind:
"Muslims" isn't the point. "Extremist Islamist fundamentalists" is the point.
I know of at least two "non-extremist" Muslims who will not abide dogs.
@george-k said in Left Behind:
@doctor-phibes said in Left Behind:
"Muslims" isn't the point. "Extremist Islamist fundamentalists" is the point.
I know of at least two "non-extremist" Muslims who will not abide dogs.
So therefore they kill them, too, or what?
Please love yourself.
-
@doctor-phibes said in Left Behind:
"Muslims" isn't the point. "Extremist Islamist fundamentalists" is the point.
I know of at least two "non-extremist" Muslims who will not abide dogs.
@george-k said in Left Behind:
@doctor-phibes said in Left Behind:
"Muslims" isn't the point. "Extremist Islamist fundamentalists" is the point.
I know of at least two "non-extremist" Muslims who will not abide dogs.
I know more than two white Americans who feel much the same way about cats.
My dad wasn't mad keen on the Japanese.
-
@george-k said in Left Behind:
@doctor-phibes said in Left Behind:
"Muslims" isn't the point. "Extremist Islamist fundamentalists" is the point.
I know of at least two "non-extremist" Muslims who will not abide dogs.
So therefore they kill them, too, or what?
@aqua-letifer said in Left Behind:
I know of at least two "non-extremist" Muslims who will not abide dogs.
So therefore they kill them, too, or what?
No, of course not.
But, they won't allow them in their homes.
How do you think that'll play out in Kabul?
@Doctor-Phibes said:
I know more than two white Americans who feel much the same way about cats.
My dad wasn't mad keen on the Japanese.
Yeah, I know several who don't like cats either.
Both you and @Aqua-Letifer are trying to equate reasonable, sane people who have a dislike with 7th century fundamentalists.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@george-k said in Left Behind:
@doctor-phibes said in Left Behind:
"Muslims" isn't the point. "Extremist Islamist fundamentalists" is the point.
I know of at least two "non-extremist" Muslims who will not abide dogs.
So therefore they kill them, too, or what?
@aqua-letifer said in Left Behind:
@george-k said in Left Behind:
@doctor-phibes said in Left Behind:
"Muslims" isn't the point. "Extremist Islamist fundamentalists" is the point.
I know of at least two "non-extremist" Muslims who will not abide dogs.
So therefore they kill them, too, or what?
Nah, the Mexican family down the street kills them for them.
Tacos, anyone?
-
@aqua-letifer said in Left Behind:
I know of at least two "non-extremist" Muslims who will not abide dogs.
So therefore they kill them, too, or what?
No, of course not.
But, they won't allow them in their homes.
How do you think that'll play out in Kabul?
@Doctor-Phibes said:
I know more than two white Americans who feel much the same way about cats.
My dad wasn't mad keen on the Japanese.
Yeah, I know several who don't like cats either.
Both you and @Aqua-Letifer are trying to equate reasonable, sane people who have a dislike with 7th century fundamentalists.
@george-k said in Left Behind:
oth you and @Aqua-Letifer are trying to equate reasonable, sane people who have a dislike with 7th century fundamentalists.
No, I'm absolutely not. That was the whole point of what I complained about. It was other people that were saying 'Muslims', I was the one who pointed out that 'Muslim' and 'Extremist Islamist Fundamentalist' are not one and the same thing. The people who are in charge in Afghanistan are the latter.
-
@george-k said in Left Behind:
oth you and @Aqua-Letifer are trying to equate reasonable, sane people who have a dislike with 7th century fundamentalists.
No, I'm absolutely not. That was the whole point of what I complained about. It was other people that were saying 'Muslims', I was the one who pointed out that 'Muslim' and 'Extremist Islamist Fundamentalist' are not one and the same thing. The people who are in charge in Afghanistan are the latter.
@doctor-phibes said in Left Behind:
I was the one who pointed out that 'Muslim' and 'Extremist Islamist Fundamentalist' are not one and the same thing.
I got that.
Now, which of those two do you think are going to deal with the dogs in Kabul?
The people who are in charge in Afghanistan are the latter.
Precisely.
-
@doctor-phibes said in Left Behind:
I was the one who pointed out that 'Muslim' and 'Extremist Islamist Fundamentalist' are not one and the same thing.
I got that.
Now, which of those two do you think are going to deal with the dogs in Kabul?
The people who are in charge in Afghanistan are the latter.
Precisely.
@george-k said in Left Behind:
@doctor-phibes said in Left Behind:
I was the one who pointed out that 'Muslim' and 'Extremist Islamist Fundamentalist' are not one and the same thing.
I got that.
Now, which of those two do you think are going to deal with the dogs in Kabul?
Yes, I know the dogs are fucked. So are all the people. I don't know why we're focusing on the dogs, to be honest.
Speaking of which, there's a British guy who's been running amok trying to save animals, as well. He threatened a member of the British government and went on a big rant, but he left his own people behind when he extricated a load of animals. The guy's a freaking maniac as far as I'm concerned - his attempts to get animals out was getting in the way of the humanitarian effort.
