Biden "Forcefully" defends Afghan withdrawal
-
@improviso said in Biden "Forcefully" defends Afghan withdrawal:
First and foremost, I would not have telegraphed our intention to leave in 3 months as Biden did.
This sounds so sensible as to be self evident!
I've been wondering: Where were the White House military advisors in all this? Where were the experienced Pentagon voices that would have been able to plan this better? The people whose job it is to provide advice and guidance? Could the decision have been so impulsive and sudden that the smart heads were caught off guard?
I would have placed the 5000 troops at the airport to secure it first, rather than deploy them as the Taliban were entering the city.
I would have had all the visa's ready for all the Afghan's that helped us.
Tough to do all this secretly, though . . .
-
One of the leaders of the Taliban spent 7 years in Guantanamo and was released by Obama.
-
@lufins-dad said in Biden "Forcefully" defends Afghan withdrawal:
One of the leaders of the Taliban spent 7 years in Guantanamo and was released by Obama.
Good thing you posted that here.
If you posted it on Twitter, you'd be banned for life.
-
@catseye3 said in Biden "Forcefully" defends Afghan withdrawal:
Where were the White House military advisors in all this?
Go to 36:00
Link to video -
I suspect he wanted to get it done as far from November 22 as possible.
I heard yesterday something that made sense to me from one of the ,military advisors over there. We built an army for a nation that doesn’t really exist, at least not as we know if. Afghanistan is fractious, tribal and the levers and centers of power are not that of a modern nation.
-
The tragedy of the good Afghan folks who supported us - and for the young women allowed education and career opportunities - what a rug to be pulled out from under them. The Taliban don't feel a need for compromise as they have both religious fervor and the power to implement the rules they want - a theocracy. Respect for individual liberty or a diversity of ideas - not so much a priority.
For all of our intelligence capabilities, it seems clear that we missed the mark by a long stretch in predicting the speed of the fall. Trump was criticized for his negotiations directly with the Taliban. I've not heard anything about this administration having direct contact with them. It would have been advantageous to negotiate a more orderly withdrawal - though it is certainly possible that we just gave them the middle finger.
-
@kluurs said in Biden "Forcefully" defends Afghan withdrawal:
For all of our intelligence capabilities, it seems clear that we missed the mark by a long stretch
Again. Our "intelligence" community (and I say that with a huge dose of irony) looks like the Keystone Kops - but not as funny.
-
@george-k said in Biden "Forcefully" defends Afghan withdrawal:
@george-k said in Biden "Forcefully" defends Afghan withdrawal:
Not like Saigon at all.
Jesus...
All flights out of Kabul have been suspended because more people were on the outside of the plane than inside.
-
@george-k said in Biden "Forcefully" defends Afghan withdrawal:
@kluurs said in Biden "Forcefully" defends Afghan withdrawal:
The left has fun too...
We can play that game all day. How many Talibs were released in exchange for Bowe Bergdahl, five?
To be honest, I don't think this aspect should be a partisan issue. Trump broke with GOP philosophy in wanting to get out of foreign conflicts, and Biden's withdrawal is in-line with this. Letting people out of prison probably isn't the most important question - for every raging fanatic imprisoned, there's five more waiting in the wings to take over.
The real question about the current situation is the rather disastrous tactical implementation. Who on earth planned this cluster?
-
@jolly said in Biden "Forcefully" defends Afghan withdrawal:
The buck stops on Buddy's desk.
Yeah, I know that. This is disastrous for Biden, and he should be held accountable.
But who actually planned it?
The cynical part of me wonders whether he jumped so soon in the hope that it would all be forgotten by 2024 - not that he's likely to be running at that point.